Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
> I didnt start this thread, i was just suggesting LSF as good load balancing
> techqnique for samba
Please pardon my confusion.
> But you have raised valid questions for the person who started this.
> thanks'
It seems the gating factor for any type of performance in
23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: load balancing question
Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
> Why dont we chose a mechanism to connect to the host itself
> like static dns rounrobin ,each connection will round robin'ed'
> or some dynamic round robin utilies
Well, you are the on
Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
> Why dont we chose a mechanism to connect to the host itself
> like static dns rounrobin ,each connection will round robin'ed'
> or some dynamic round robin utilies
Well, you are the only one that really knows the requirements of your
application.
You seem to be ask
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: load balancing question
Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 07:29:44AM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>
>>So it all comes down to what the underlying platform supports for shared
>>simultaneous disk access.
>
> Even that will not
To clear up some confustion in this thread.
A DFS will only help distribute the load if the clients are accessing
files in different directories.
\\host\share\dir1\ would be served by host_1
\\host\share\dir2\ would be served by host_2
\\host\share\dir3\ would be served by host_3
If all
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:17:30PM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> Right, a distributed file system should support distributed locking, and
> the rate of logons should not be that high that it stretches the ability
> of the DFS to lock and unlock the file.
The point is not to make that work, thi
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 07:29:44AM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> >
> >>So it all comes down to what the underlying platform supports for shared
> >>simultaneous disk access.
> >
> > Even that will not help. Load Balanc
Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 07:29:44AM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>
>>So it all comes down to what the underlying platform supports for shared
>>simultaneous disk access.
>
> Even that will not help. Load Balancing SMB will not work due to the locking
> stuff across con
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 07:29:44AM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> So it all comes down to what the underlying platform supports for shared
> simultaneous disk access.
Even that will not help. Load Balancing SMB will not work due to the locking
stuff across connections. If you could get tdb's w
Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, René Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
>>Richard Sharpe wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>>>
Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
>MSDFS is filey system right, how will it help to load balance samba
>connections
>
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, René Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Richard Sharpe wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>MSDFS is filey system right, how will it help to load balance samba
> >>>connections
> >>>what criteria does it r
Richard Sharpe wrote:
>On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>
>
>
>>Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
>>
>>
>>>MSDFS is filey system right, how will it help to load balance samba
>>>connections
>>>what criteria does it rely to load balance ( like memory, or no of
>>>connetions etc.. )
>>>
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
> > MSDFS is filey system right, how will it help to load balance samba
> > connections
> > what criteria does it rely to load balance ( like memory, or no of
> > connetions etc.. )
>
> MSDFS does not really load balance.
Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
> MSDFS is filey system right, how will it help to load balance samba
> connections
> what criteria does it rely to load balance ( like memory, or no of
> connetions etc.. )
MSDFS does not really load balance. MSDFS distributes the
subdirectories of a directory betwee
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
> MSDFS is filey system right, how will it help to load balance samba
> connections
> what criteria does it rely to load balance ( like memory, or no of
> connetions etc.. )
Well, that is up to you. It is simple enough to roundrobin the entries.
Do
M
> Subject: Re: load balancing question
>
> Stephan Stapel wrote:
> > Dear people on the list!
> >
> > I hope it's ok to ask a feature question on this core-feature list.
> > What I would like to know is whether there are some efforts on
> > im
Good load balancing utility would be lsf , which is dynamic but not free i
suppose, others would BIND static round robin
any more suggestions :-)))
-Original Message-
From: John E. Malmberg
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10/5/02 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: load balancing question
Stephan Stapel
Stephan Stapel wrote:
> Dear people on the list!
>
> I hope it's ok to ask a feature question on this core-feature list.
> What I would like to know is whether there are some efforts on
> implementing load balancing features into samba or some experiences/
> experiments in this area. As stan
Dear people on the list!
I hope it's ok to ask a feature question on this core-feature list.
What I would like to know is whether there are some efforts on implementing load
balancing features into samba or some experiences/ experiments in this area. As
standard-Windows doesn't offer these feat
19 matches
Mail list logo
