On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 07:46:32PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote about 'Re: net rpc
vampire & migration':
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:18:55AM +1030, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > Hmmm, so what backend do you need to be using to preserve the RIDs?
> A 'rich' one
but not in 2.2, only 3.0 sorry.
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 19:46, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:18:55AM +1030, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > Hmmm, so what backend do you need to be using to preserve the RIDs?
>
> A 'rich' one, ie currently tdb or ldap, probably mysql as well.
>
> Vo
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:18:55AM +1030, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> Hmmm, so what backend do you need to be using to preserve the RIDs?
A 'rich' one, ie currently tdb or ldap, probably mysql as well.
Volker
msg04287/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:36:44AM -0800, Tim Potter wrote:
> > If you can get net rpc vampire to spit out a smbpasswd file then
> > that could be used with a Samba 2.2 environment.
>
> For that pwdump is easier. The problem is 2.2 will kill your RID's
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Richard, do you confirm NTUSER.DAT files works ok after that change?
Seems to work for me. I changed my Server's name, rejoined, ran the
program and changed both the OWNER and GROUP SID, and it seemed to work.
I want to try it again, but you could try it
Richard, do you confirm NTUSER.DAT files works ok after that change?
Simo.
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 18:56, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Guillaume LACHENAL wrote:
>
> > I've just downloaded HEAD from cvs and code is currently under compilation
> > on my personal testing box (no hardwa
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:36:44AM -0800, Tim Potter wrote:
> If you can get net rpc vampire to spit out a smbpasswd file then
> that could be used with a Samba 2.2 environment.
For that pwdump is easier. The problem is 2.2 will kill your RID's.
That's the hole point of vampire in 3.0
Volker
m
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 05:12:23PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 04:58:36PM +0100, Guillaume LACHENAL wrote:
> > as 3.0 is still in alpha state, do you think is there a way
> > to use 'net rpc vampire' from 3.0 on samba 2.2.6 ?
>
> No, not possible. That's really a 3.0 o
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Guillaume LACHENAL wrote:
> I've just downloaded HEAD from cvs and code is currently under compilation
> on my personal testing box (no hardware at work, it s a pity ...)
>
> Just one question while my P200 is under heavy load :
>
> does the vampire code allow a migration of
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 04:58:36PM +0100, Guillaume LACHENAL wrote:
> as 3.0 is still in alpha state, do you think is there a way
> to use 'net rpc vampire' from 3.0 on samba 2.2.6 ?
No, not possible. That's really a 3.0 only feature.
Volker
msg04276/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: net rpc vampire & migration
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:08:42PM +0100, Guillaume LACHENAL wrote:
> does the vampire code allow a migration of computer accounts ?
Yes, that is exactly the idea. To use it, make sure that all your scripts
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:08:42PM +0100, Guillaume LACHENAL wrote:
> does the vampire code allow a migration of computer accounts ?
Yes, that is exactly the idea. To use it, make sure that all your scripts like
add machine script
add user script
add group script
etc are all set correct and work
I've just downloaded HEAD from cvs and code is currently under compilation
on my personal testing box (no hardware at work, it s a pity ...)
Just one question while my P200 is under heavy load :
does the vampire code allow a migration of computer accounts ?
this is the last missing feature for a
13 matches
Mail list logo
