Re: smbwrapper/smbsh on Linux/glibc

2002-12-16 Thread David Collier-Brown -- Customer Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So my questions are: > > 1. Are there LFS requirements for SMB/CIFS or can I just drop the high-order >portion of 64-bit file offsets? There was a previous dicussion of the LFS/glibc issues, including some Samba ones, at http://www.scyld.com/products/beowulf/softwa

smbwrapper/smbsh on Linux/glibc

2002-12-13 Thread Derrell . Lipman
I have found that due to the way the macro definitions are used in the glibc header files, it is not possible to know the size of structures that was used in an independently-compiled application. libsmbclient, similarly, futzes with internal macros to force the glibc definitions into mapping 32-b