On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:49:56PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> > > Some files have a little valgrind_strlen function in there, I suppose
> > > to work around
On 11 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:49:56PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> > Some files have a little valgrind_strlen function in there, I suppose
> > to work around a Valgrind bug. Does anyone know what the bug was?
> &g
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:49:56PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> Some files have a little valgrind_strlen function in there, I suppose
> to work around a Valgrind bug. Does anyone know what the bug was?
> There might be a cleaner solution.
I've not used it myself, and with valgind
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:49:56PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> Some files have a little valgrind_strlen function in there, I suppose
> to work around a Valgrind bug. Does anyone know what the bug was?
> There might be a cleaner solution.
Yep, it's a glibc inlining strlen() calls p
Some files have a little valgrind_strlen function in there, I suppose
to work around a Valgrind bug. Does anyone know what the bug was?
There might be a cleaner solution.
--
Martin