Re: valgrind_strlen?

2003-03-10 Thread John H Terpstra
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Martin Pool wrote: > On 11 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:49:56PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote: > > > Some files have a little valgrind_strlen function in there, I suppose > > > to work around

Re: valgrind_strlen?

2003-03-10 Thread Martin Pool
On 11 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:49:56PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote: > > Some files have a little valgrind_strlen function in there, I suppose > > to work around a Valgrind bug. Does anyone know what the bug was? > &g

Re: valgrind_strlen?

2003-03-10 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:49:56PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote: > Some files have a little valgrind_strlen function in there, I suppose > to work around a Valgrind bug. Does anyone know what the bug was? > There might be a cleaner solution. I've not used it myself, and with valgind

Re: valgrind_strlen?

2003-03-10 Thread jra
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:49:56PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote: > Some files have a little valgrind_strlen function in there, I suppose > to work around a Valgrind bug. Does anyone know what the bug was? > There might be a cleaner solution. Yep, it's a glibc inlining strlen() calls p

valgrind_strlen?

2003-03-10 Thread Martin Pool
Some files have a little valgrind_strlen function in there, I suppose to work around a Valgrind bug. Does anyone know what the bug was? There might be a cleaner solution. -- Martin