Re: winbindd uid and gid range assumptions

2002-05-14 Thread abartlet
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:20:03AM -0400, Mike Gerdts wrote: > On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 18:42, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > Moving over the socket is a very expencive operation, particularly > > compared to a simple if statement. Also, where we know that a uid is > > local, we need to check with code

Re: winbindd uid and gid range assumptions

2002-05-14 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 18:42, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Moving over the socket is a very expencive operation, particularly > compared to a simple if statement. Also, where we know that a uid is > local, we need to check with code that winbind isn't linked to - the > passdb backend. So in a situati

Re: winbindd uid and gid range assumptions

2002-05-13 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Mike Gerdts wrote: > > It seems as though there was an assumption that users of winbindd would > have switched entirely to NT domain authentication or that they would > have distinct range of UIDs/GIDs for /etc/passwd (or NIS) and NT domain. > Is there any good reason to not just let get_id_from

winbindd uid and gid range assumptions

2002-05-13 Thread Mike Gerdts
It seems as though there was an assumption that users of winbindd would have switched entirely to NT domain authentication or that they would have distinct range of UIDs/GIDs for /etc/passwd (or NIS) and NT domain. The most obvious sign of this is the peppering of statements like the following th