Re: Packet analysis: WinXP vs. Linux-VMS shows dramatic differences

2004-09-22 Thread John E. Malmberg
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], COLLOT Jean-Yves [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Excuse me, but I don't agree. I just ran Ben's ruby bench, which is creating that 1 Kb file, and I can see the very, very slow = behaviour: it takes more than 36 seconds to run the bench (compared to 2.35 seconds =

Re: Packet analysis: WinXP vs. Linux-VMS shows dramatic differences

2004-09-22 Thread John E. Malmberg
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], COLLOT Jean-Yves [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Once again, I am sorry, but it looks like I don't understand. As far as I know, Ben pointed out a problem of performances when writing files on a Samba/VMS 2.2.8 server from an XP client. I could reproduce that problem

Packet analysis: WinXP vs. Linux-VMS shows dramatic differences

2004-09-20 Thread BG - Ben Armstrong
Hi, I'm trying to figure out why the bench.rb test program I included in my previous note takes several times longer to run using a WinXP client than a Linux client, both talking to our OpenVMS samba server. The big picture question is, How do we tune our clients and/or server to improve overall