RE : Samba 2.2.8 (JYC 31-Mar-05 version) problem with records longer than 1022 bytes

2005-08-17 Thread David J Dachtera
a-vms@lists.samba.org >>Objet : RE: RE : Samba 2.2.8 (JYC 31-Mar-05 version) problem with records >>longer than 1022 bytes >> >>Thanks for your prompt response. Unfortunately I don't have the facility to >>compile. :-(I will have to wait for your next release

RE : Samba 2.2.8 (JYC 31-Mar-05 version) problem with records longer than 1022 bytes

2005-08-17 Thread John Santos
a-vms@lists.samba.org Objet : RE: RE : Samba 2.2.8 (JYC 31-Mar-05 version) problem with records longer than 1022 bytes Thanks for your prompt response. Unfortunately I don't have the facility to compile. :-(I will have to wait for your next release. Keep up the great work. Regards. I'm tr

Re: RE : Samba 2.2.8 (JYC 31-Mar-05 version) problem with records longer than 1022 bytes

2005-08-17 Thread BG - Ben Armstrong
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 20:29 -0500, David J Dachtera wrote: > Just wondering if there is a "Known Issues List" for the current JYC > release(s). > > ...and/or if anyone knows of anymore such "holes in the road" that may jump > out and bite us. We have three outstanding issues with the current rele

RE : Samba 2.2.8 (JYC 31-Mar-05 version) problem with records longer than 1022 bytes

2005-08-16 Thread David J Dachtera
Just wondering if there is a "Known Issues List" for the current JYC release(s). ...and/or if anyone knows of anymore such "holes in the road" that may jump out and bite us. D.J.D. At 04:02 PM 08/16/2005 +0200, COLLOT Jean-Yves wrote: >You are completely right. This is due from a limitation in t

RE: RE : Samba 2.2.8 (JYC 31-Mar-05 version) problem with records longer than 1022 bytes

2005-08-16 Thread Rodney Kimber
AM To: Rodney Kimber; 'samba-vms@lists.samba.org' Subject: RE : Samba 2.2.8 (JYC 31-Mar-05 version) problem with records longer than 1022 bytes You are completely right. This is due from a limitation in the size of the buffer used for temporarily reading the records from a variable-size fil