An accident. We also skipped 1.1.0, so I just did the same thing.
allan
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:24 AM Ulf Zibis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> why you start with version 1.2.1 instead 1.2.0 ?
>
> -Ulf
> Am 08.02.23 um 02:43 schrieb m. allan noah:
>
> Sounds reasonable, though at the moment I am pretty
Hi,
why you start with version 1.2.1 instead 1.2.0 ?
-Ulf
Am 08.02.23 um 02:43 schrieb m. allan noah:
Sounds reasonable, though at the moment I am pretty frustrated with how this
backends release went. I know folks worked pretty hard on what we have now
(particularly Olaf), but I think I am
