I am head of development at Ambir, the manufacturer of this scanner. That
model has been out of production for over a decade. It’s likely the unit is
EOL and that clicking you are hearing is coming from the motor. There are no
belts, only gears in the unit and sure it’s possible the gears
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 11:52 AM Miss Tori wrote:
>
> I'll try wine or run a vm. I will then try to locate a windows machine if
> those two options don't pan out.
>
> The last time I tried to use it, it worked. That was Sept 2016.
> scanimage -V
> scanimage (sane-backends) 1.1.1-debian;
On 2/9/23 14:37, Ralph Little wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 11:34 AM Miss Tori wrote:
On 2/9/23 14:12, Ralph Little wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 11:07 AM Miss Tori
wrote:
Update to my mailing below (I deleted it before it was
approved to the
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 11:34 AM Miss Tori wrote:
>
> On 2/9/23 14:12, Ralph Little wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 11:07 AM Miss Tori wrote:
>
>> Update to my mailing below (I deleted it before it was approved to the
>> list)
>> It definitely has to do with what's going on
On 2/9/23 14:12, Ralph Little wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 11:07 AM Miss Tori wrote:
Update to my mailing below (I deleted it before it was approved to
the list)
It definitely has to do with what's going on during the sane_read
API function.
If I issue
FYI: The last time I tried to use it was Sept of 2016. It functioned on
this debian linux machine at that time using SANE.
On 2/9/23 14:24, Mike Hansen wrote:
I am head of development at Ambir, the manufacturer of this scanner.
That model has been out of production for over a decade. It’s
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 11:24 AM Mike Hansen wrote:
> I am head of development at Ambir, the manufacturer of this scanner. That
> model has been out of production for over a decade. It’s likely the unit
> is EOL and that clicking you are hearing is coming from the motor. There
> are no
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 11:11 AM m. allan noah wrote:
> Frontends or backends? Either way, I am not opposed to abandoning quirks
> for ancient platforms.
>
>
In this case the suggestion is for backends.
I agree that flushing out ancient code is a good thing in general. I only
worry that SANE
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 11:07 AM Miss Tori wrote:
> Update to my mailing below (I deleted it before it was approved to the
> list)
> It definitely has to do with what's going on during the sane_read API
> function.
>
> If I issue scanimage -T, it will start clicking instantly
>
There
Frontends or backends? Either way, I am not opposed to abandoning quirks
for ancient platforms.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 12:29 PM Ralph Little wrote:
> There has been a proposal to remove the library replacement functions from
> the backend repo.
>
Update to my mailing below (I deleted it before it was approved to the
list)
It definitely has to do with what's going on during the sane_read API
function.
If I issue scanimage -T, it will start clicking instantly
# scanimage --output-file=scan.jpg -vv
[13:50:58.250725] [genesys]
There has been a proposal to remove the library replacement functions from
the backend repo.
https://gitlab.com/sane-project/frontends/-/merge_requests/11
On the surface, this seems sensible. I can't see that there are many if any
platforms that the backends repo is built on that wouldn't have
12 matches
Mail list logo
