Re: [sane-devel] Fast fi-65F slow with SANE

2022-02-09 Thread Felix E. Klee
Ralph Little writes: > Since you have a USB connection, the device name is likely to change > every time you power cycle the scanner as the USB subsystem will > assign a different address. Thanks for pointing that out! > Leaving only the fujitsu backend available in the dll.conf file, the >

Re: [sane-devel] Fast fi-65F slow with SANE

2022-02-08 Thread m. allan noah
'epjitsu' backend, in this case. allan On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 12:52 PM Ralph Little wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 9:02 AM m. allan noah wrote: > >> An easier mechanism might be to comment out all the backends you are not >> using in /etc/sane.d/dll.conf >> >> allan >> >> > On Tue,

Re: [sane-devel] Fast fi-65F slow with SANE

2022-02-08 Thread Ralph Little
Hi, On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 9:02 AM m. allan noah wrote: > An easier mechanism might be to comment out all the backends you are not > using in /etc/sane.d/dll.conf > > allan > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 11:54 AM Felix E. Klee wrote: > >> Ralph Little writes: >> > If you don't specify the scanner

Re: [sane-devel] Fast fi-65F slow with SANE

2022-02-08 Thread m. allan noah
An easier mechanism might be to comment out all the backends you are not using in /etc/sane.d/dll.conf allan On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 11:54 AM Felix E. Klee wrote: > Ralph Little writes: > > If you don't specify the scanner to scanimage with the -d option, then > > it will poll around all the

Re: [sane-devel] Fast fi-65F slow with SANE

2022-02-08 Thread Felix E. Klee
Ralph Little writes: > If you don't specify the scanner to scanimage with the -d option, then > it will poll around all the backends to obtain a list of the available > scanners first. This typically can take quite a good few seconds. This is the explanation, thanks! Glad I asked. Now this is

Re: [sane-devel] Fast fi-65F slow with SANE

2022-02-08 Thread Ralph Little
Hi, On 2022-02-08 07:49, Felix E. Klee wrote: "m. allan noah" writes: What debugging messages are produced right before the delay? Not a single one. It just sits there for close to ten seconds, before the first message appears. Find the first 200 lines of debug messages attached, generated

Re: [sane-devel] Fast fi-65F slow with SANE

2022-02-08 Thread Felix E. Klee
"m. allan noah" writes: > What debugging messages are produced right before the delay? Not a single one. It just sits there for close to ten seconds, before the first message appears. Find the first 200 lines of debug messages attached, generated with: SANE_DEBUG_EPJITSU=255 scanimage -o

Re: [sane-devel] Fast fi-65F slow with SANE

2022-02-08 Thread m. allan noah
What debugging messages are produced right before the delay? On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 9:25 AM Felix E. Klee wrote: > The Fujitsu fi-65F can scan an A6 page in just one second. This works > as advertised with the included “PaperStream Capture”. It even works > when using SANE, except that before

[sane-devel] Fast fi-65F slow with SANE

2022-02-08 Thread Felix E. Klee
The Fujitsu fi-65F can scan an A6 page in just one second. This works as advertised with the included “PaperStream Capture”. It even works when using SANE, except that before each scan there is a delay of almost ten (!) seconds: $ cat /etc/lsb-release LSB_VERSION=1.4 DISTRIB_ID=Arch