Olaf,
On Friday, 2020-02-14 17:32:39 +0100, I myself wrote:
> ...
> So I bit the bullet and created just another account in order to submit
> an issue. Again in vain: "File is too big (27.33MiB). Max filesize:
> 10MiB".
Ok. So be it. I meanwhile remembered one of my scripts which
Olaf,
On Saturday, 2020-02-15 11:13:32 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> > What's next? Reduce the value of "SANE_DEBUG_BJNP"? But I can't guar-
> > antee I can reproduce this particular behaviour.
>
> That's probably the best solution even though that would change the
> timing of events leading to
Hi Rainer,
Dr Rainer Woitok writes:
> Olaf,
>
> On Wednesday, 2020-02-12 20:17:17 +0900, you wrote:
>
>> ...
>> You could copy your libsane-$BACKEND.* to wherever libsane.* gets
>> installed, i.e. $libdir in ./configure terms.
>
> Ok, since I'm currently installing into my home directory, I get
Hi Rainer,
Dr Rainer Woitok writes:
> Olaf,
>
> On Friday, 2020-02-14 14:28:16 +0100, I myself wrote:
>
>> ...
>> I've compressed the debug output from tests 1 and 3, but the files are
>> still huge:
>>
>>$ ls -l *.bz2
>>-rw--- 1 rainer rainer 28659462 2020-02-14 13:35
Allan,
On Friday, 2020-02-14 11:36:43 -0500, you wrote:
> Did you compress the file?
Yes, of course. After all the "*.bz2" files were already there :-)
Sincerely,
Rainer
Did you compress the file?
allan
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 11:32 AM Dr Rainer Woitok
wrote:
>
> Olaf,
>
> On Friday, 2020-02-14 14:28:16 +0100, I myself wrote:
>
> > ...
> > I've compressed the debug output from tests 1 and 3, but the files are
> > still huge:
> >
> >$ ls -l *.bz2
> >
Olaf,
On Friday, 2020-02-14 14:28:16 +0100, I myself wrote:
> ...
> I've compressed the debug output from tests 1 and 3, but the files are
> still huge:
>
>$ ls -l *.bz2
>-rw--- 1 rainer rainer 28659462 2020-02-14 13:35 paperjam.log.bz2
>-rw--- 1 rainer rainer 56919612
Hi Rainer
to get an indication where the issue is: can you please repeat the same
tests with USB connection? That ill help decide if the issue is in the
backend proper of the BJNP code
Thanks, Louis
On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 14:28 +0100, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> Olaf,
>
> I promised to run
Olaf,
I promised to run tests using the current version of "sane-backends" as
well as my Canon Pixma scanner. I used a three sheets, six pages color
original and scanned with "--source 'ADF Duplex'":
Test 1: Run with "export SANE_DEBUG_BJNP=127". After scanning the 4-th
page
Olaf,
On Wednesday, 2020-02-12 20:17:17 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> You could copy your libsane-$BACKEND.* to wherever libsane.* gets
> installed, i.e. $libdir in ./configure terms.
Ok, since I'm currently installing into my home directory, I get
$ ls -lp lib/
total 336
-rwxr-xr-x 1
Hi Rainer,
Dr Rainer Woitok writes:
> Olaf,
>
> On Tuesday, 2020-02-11 17:50:54 +0900, you wrote:
>
>> ...
>> > # Since I'm only specifying a single backend anyway, why not include it
>> > # right into the binary rather than load it at start-up?
>>
>> Why not make that backend your libsane
Olaf,
On Tuesday, 2020-02-11 17:50:54 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> > # Since I'm only specifying a single backend anyway, why not include it
> > # right into the binary rather than load it at start-up?
>
> Why not make that backend your libsane instance?
And how to do that? Or is that what
Hi Rainer,
Dr Rainer Woitok writes:
> Olaf,
>
> On Saturday, 2020-02-08 12:12:00 +0900, you wrote:
>
>> ...
>> > I've appended file "config.status" below. However, file "config.log" is
>> > about 300+ kB in size and thus would be quarantained again. Is it ok to
>> > mail it only to you
Hi Rainer,
Dr Rainer Woitok writes:
> Olaf,
>
> On Saturday, 2020-02-08 12:52:49 +0900, you wrote:
>
> [ "> >" refers to Bruce Schultz' mail ]
>
>> ...
>> > That fails now for me with the same error you error you had.
>>
>> For me too (on our CI's debian-10-full setup with 336cbdfd as well as
>>
Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
Olaf,
it's been a while, and I was busy solving more pressing problems. Now
I'm back again to tackle this scanning issue.
On Sunday, 2019-12-15 16:41:01 +0900, you wrote:
...
I know about the existence of environment variable "SANE_DEBUG_BJNP" but
have no idea
Olaf,
On Saturday, 2020-02-08 12:52:49 +0900, you wrote:
[ "> >" refers to Bruce Schultz' mail ]
> ...
> > That fails now for me with the same error you error you had.
>
> For me too (on our CI's debian-10-full setup with 336cbdfd as well as
> 1.0.29) but I also get a pile of multiple
Olaf,
On Saturday, 2020-02-08 12:12:00 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> > I've appended file "config.status" below. However, file "config.log" is
> > about 300+ kB in size and thus would be quarantained again. Is it ok to
> > mail it only to you privately?
>
> You already did ;-)
> By sending mail
Olaf,
this is my second try to answer your mail because the first was held due
to being more than 100 kB in size, and I then cancelled it.
On Wednesday, 2020-02-05 18:47:14 +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> ...
> So, if HAVE_LIBJPEG is not defined (check include/sane/config.h), that
> compiled
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for taking a look at this!
Bruce Schultz writes:
> On 2020-02-08 03:51, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
>> Bruce,
>>
>> On Thursday, 2020-02-06 06:47:53 +1000, you wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>>> Also, what options are you passing in to ./configure ?
>> Currently the not $PREFIX related options
Hi Rainer,
Dr Rainer Woitok writes:
> Olaf,
>
> this is my second try to answer your mail because the first was held due
> to being more than 100 kB in size, and I then cancelled it.
>
> On Wednesday, 2020-02-05 18:47:14 +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
>> ...
>> So, if HAVE_LIBJPEG is not
On 2020-02-08 03:51, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
Bruce,
On Thursday, 2020-02-06 06:47:53 +1000, you wrote:
...
Also, what options are you passing in to ./configure ?
Currently the not $PREFIX related options I'm using are
$ ./configure --disable-avahi --disable-dynamic --disable-nls \
Bruce,
On Thursday, 2020-02-06 06:47:53 +1000, you wrote:
> ...
> Also, what options are you passing in to ./configure ?
Currently the not $PREFIX related options I'm using are
$ ./configure --disable-avahi --disable-dynamic --disable-nls \
--enable-ipv6
On 2020-02-05 19:47, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
Hi Rainer,
Dr Rainer Woitok writes:
Olaf,
On Friday, 2020-01-31 18:08:28 +0900, you wrote:
...
This shouldn't be anything to worry about but I've submitted an issue
for it. You can find it at:
Hi Rainer,
Dr Rainer Woitok writes:
> Olaf,
>
> On Friday, 2020-01-31 18:08:28 +0900, you wrote:
>
>> ...
>> This shouldn't be anything to worry about but I've submitted an issue
>> for it. You can find it at:
>>
>> https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/issues/235
>>
>> If you could add
Olaf,
On Friday, 2020-01-31 18:08:28 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> This shouldn't be anything to worry about but I've submitted an issue
> for it. You can find it at:
>
> https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/issues/235
>
> If you could add distribution/version info as well as attach your
>
Hi Rainer,
Dr Rainer Woitok writes:
> [...]
> Next I cloned the Git repository in order to be able to freely change
> between various versions to find one which is working for me by compil-
> ing "sane-backends" myself. For a first test I checked out changeset
> 1942c5fd32a7 authored by
Olaf,
it's been a while, and I was busy solving more pressing problems. Now
I'm back again to tackle this scanning issue.
On Sunday, 2019-12-15 16:41:01 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> > I know about the existence of environment variable "SANE_DEBUG_BJNP" but
> > have no idea what value to set it
On 2019-12-20 04:37, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
Bruce and All,
On Tuesday, 2019-12-17 07:07:14 +1000, Bruce Schultz wrote:
...
You could try rebuilding the backends with the following command:
EGIT_OVERRIDE_COMMIT_SANE_PROJECT_BACKENDS=6b7052c4 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="**"
emerge -av1
On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 19:37 +0100, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
>
>
> That's the old story that my router is advertizing several addresses
> to
> "scanimage" which all but the last aren't scanners at all. And
> every-
> time "scanimage" waits five seconds for the request to time
> out. So I
>
Bruce and All,
On Tuesday, 2019-12-17 07:07:14 +1000, Bruce Schultz wrote:
> ...
> You could try rebuilding the backends with the following command:
>
> EGIT_OVERRIDE_COMMIT_SANE_PROJECT_BACKENDS=6b7052c4 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="**"
> emerge -av1 =media-gfx/sane-backends-
>
> That will install
On Tue, 2019-12-17 at 07:07 +1000, Bruce Schultz wrote:
> Hi Rainer
>
> On 2019-12-15 03:43, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> > Bruce and All,
> >
> > On Thursday, 2019-12-12 23:44:38 +1000, Bruce Schultz wrote:
> >
> > > ...
> > > Rainer can you try now with the sane-backends-.ebuild, which
> > >
Hi Rainer,
Dr Rainer Woitok writes:
> Bruce and All,
>
> On Thursday, 2019-12-12 23:44:38 +1000, Bruce Schultz wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Rainer can you try now with the sane-backends-.ebuild, which will
>> install the current git version of the backends. I'm hopeful that having
>> something at
Bruce and All,
On Thursday, 2019-12-12 23:44:38 +1000, Bruce Schultz wrote:
> ...
> Rainer can you try now with the sane-backends-.ebuild, which will
> install the current git version of the backends. I'm hopeful that having
> something at least as recent as the known working version may
On 2019-12-10 03:05, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
Bruce,
On Thursday, 2019-12-05 06:38:52 +1000, you wrote:
...
I followed the installation instructions in your "README.md" file, first
created file "/etc/portage/repos.conf/sane-overlay.conf", and then ran
the command "emaint sync -r
Bruce,
On Thursday, 2019-12-05 06:38:52 +1000, you wrote:
> ...
> I have put together a gentoo overlay for sane-backends with version
> 1.0.28. Can you test this?
>
> https://github.com/brulzki/sane-overlay
I followed the installation instructions in your "README.md" file, first
created file
On 2019-12-05 02:41, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
Olaf,
On Wednesday, 2019-12-04 21:29:05 +0900, you wrote:
...
In that case, I suggest you upgrade to at least 1.0.28 and possibly even
to something later on our master branch.
Gentoo currently does not provide a newer version than 1.0.27-r3.
I
On 2019-12-05 02:41, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
Olaf,
On Wednesday, 2019-12-04 21:29:05 +0900, you wrote:
...
In that case, I suggest you upgrade to at least 1.0.28 and possibly even
to something later on our master branch.
Gentoo currently does not provide a newer version than 1.0.27-r3.
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 8:41 AM Dr Rainer Woitok
wrote:
>
> Gentoo currently does not provide a newer version than 1.0.27-r3. And
> if the information I found at
>
>
I haven't had anything to do with Gentoo for a long time although for a
couple of years it was my primary distro.
Your
Olaf,
On Wednesday, 2019-12-04 21:29:05 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> In that case, I suggest you upgrade to at least 1.0.28 and possibly even
> to something later on our master branch.
Gentoo currently does not provide a newer version than 1.0.27-r3. And
if the information I found at
Hi Rainer,
Dr Rainer Woitok writes:
> Ralph,
>
> On Tuesday, 2019-12-03 07:39:14 -0800, you wrote:
>
>> ...
>> You don't say if you did adf scanning successfully on Ubuntu although I
>> assume that is the case.
>> Could you confirm that?
>
> Yes, I can :-)
>
> The "scanimage" binary I used
Ralph,
On Tuesday, 2019-12-03 07:39:14 -0800, you wrote:
> ...
> You don't say if you did adf scanning successfully on Ubuntu although I
> assume that is the case.
> Could you confirm that?
Yes, I can :-)
The "scanimage" binary I used under Ubuntu worked with all the options
regarding scan
Hi
You don't say if you did adf scanning successfully on Ubuntu although I
assume that is the case.
Could you confirm that?
Cheers
Ralph
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019, 06:58 Dr Rainer Woitok,
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> since quite some time I have been successfully using "scanimage" on my
> laptop
Greetings,
since quite some time I have been successfully using "scanimage" on my
laptop running Ubuntu 16.04 to scan from a Canon Pixma MX 885 scanner
connected via WiFi.
Under Ubuntu 16.04 the "sane" package itself was version 1.0.14-11, but
packages "libsane", "libsane-common", and
43 matches
Mail list logo
