-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ahh... and does this happen when using the pnm backend?
regards
- -- jochen
- --
~ [This is a signature virus, please copy me into your signature file!]
~ GnuGP public key for jochen.eisin...@gmx.de:
~ http://home.nexgo.de/jochen.eisinger/p
Hi,
The Mustek USB backend (mustek_usb) version 1.0-4 was just released.
No new features but some internal fixes changes for a cleaner code.
http://www.meier-geinitz.de/sane/
If nobody objects I will include the backend into SANE CVS. I'm
interested in test results. I tested compiling on differe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Does this crash also occur with scanimage? and test?
regards
- -- jochen
- --
~ [This is a signature virus, please copy me into your signature file!]
~ GnuGP public key for jochen.eisin...@gmx.de:
~ http://home.nexgo.de/jochen.eisinger
Henning Meier-Geinitz, Don, 06 Sep 2001:
> Can you provide some more lines of backtrace so we can see what
> sane-net is trying to achieve here? What's in line 345? Is this a
> modified sanei_wire.c? I'm asking because flush() starts in line 390
> in the code I have. Also I don't understand #2 ->
Hello all,
Is there any new hint on the *feasibility* of the Epson Perfection 1250
support? I have to bring my scanner back to the shop tomorrow (Friday)
if the support is very unlikely.
Thanks for any piece of information,
Frederic Dumas
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:34:19PM +0200, mh wrote:
> when I try to scan over saned (localhost) using the net/plustek backend, the
> frontend crashes with a bt like this:
>
> Program received signal SIGPIPE, Broken pipe.
> 0x403f7004 in write () from /lib/libc.so.6
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x403f7004
Hi all,
when I try to scan over saned (localhost) using the net/plustek backend, the
frontend crashes with a bt like this:
Program received signal SIGPIPE, Broken pipe.
0x403f7004 in write () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x403f7004 in write () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x404a6408 in __DTOR_END__
Am Donnerstag, 6. September 2001 05:28 schrieb Olivier Delsol:
> I know that a long time ago (!), someone began to work on the minolta scan
> dual (scsi version) driver. Is someone still working on this driver ?
>
> Olivier
Hi,
a basically workable driver is in the latest ac kernels. The problem
I know that a long time ago (!), someone began to work on the minolta scan
dual (scsi version) driver. Is someone still working on this driver ?
Olivier
