Folks,
I've been trying to add an Epson Stylus Photo 810 printer on my usb
port, however this is has proved problemeatic so I defaulted to parallel
and all seemed well.
However now I'm having problems scanning (see error message and debug
output below). I'm not sure if it's me or
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 06:18:55PM +0100, Oliver Rauch wrote:
> Sounds ok, but the static libraries should be enabled when shared
> libraries do not work.
At least the NEWS file from the latest libtool indicate that this is
done automatically. I will test...
Bye,
Henning
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently looking into updating libtool in the SANE distribution.
>
> While testing other things I wondered if it makes sense to disbale
> static libraries by default (AC_DISABLE_STATIC). They can be enabled
> manually by ./configure --enable-static .
Oliver Rauch wrote:
>
> mh wrote:
>
> > I'm no i18n expert and my suggestion was only based on my own tests. I
> > recoded the translations included in SANE-1.0.7 to utf8, and couldn't see
> > any
> > problems with xsane, although it seems to use gettext 0.10.35.
> > Nevertheless, what's the sol
Henning Meier-Geinitz writes:
> I'm currently looking into updating libtool in the SANE distribution.
>
> While testing other things I wondered if it makes sense to disbale
> static libraries by default (AC_DISABLE_STATIC). They can be enabled
> manually by ./configure --enable-static . If shared
Well as notional maintainer/developer of the viceo
backend I had better get involved here.
>
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 07:32:05AM -0500, Sunil
> William Savkar wrote:
> > As a lawyer, I am unsure there is an issue here
> with integrating the
> > Visioneer back-end, since if it indeed has been
>
Hi,
I'm currently looking into updating libtool in the SANE distribution.
While testing other things I wondered if it makes sense to disbale
static libraries by default (AC_DISABLE_STATIC). They can be enabled
manually by ./configure --enable-static . If shared libraries are nor
possible on a pla
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 07:32:05AM -0500, Sunil William Savkar wrote:
> As a lawyer, I am unsure there is an issue here with integrating the
> Visioneer back-end, since if it indeed has been released to the public
> with open ownership (i.e. no strict license rights and thus if anything
> a br
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 03:03:17PM -0800, Erik Strack wrote:
> What does it normally take to get a sane backend integrated into the
> distribution?
In principle: Find a developer who checks the backend and includes it
into CVS. See also doc/backend-writing.txt for details. There have
been
Actually i killed it and then restarted it, but
I guess that shouldnt make any difference
And it was version 1.0.7
But as I wrote, I switched to xinetd and it
works great.
/Johan
On 03 Mar 2002 08:03:21 +
Jim George wrote:
> Did you remember to send a SIGHUP to inetd?
>
> Jim
>
> > Fro
Did you remember to send a SIGHUP to inetd?
Jim
> From: Henning Meier-Geinitz
> To: sane-de...@mostang.com
> Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Inetd is not a friend of saneds.
> Date: 02 Mar 2002 19:50:38 +0100
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 04:32:31PM +0100, Johan Andrén wrote:
> > I have been
Erik--
As a lawyer, I am unsure there is an issue here with integrating the
Visioneer back-end, since if it indeed has been released to the public
with open ownership (i.e. no strict license rights and thus if anything
a broad license akin to ownership), then you could make some
modifications to i
12 matches
Mail list logo
