[sane-devel] MacOS client

2002-04-19 Thread Mick Barry
What do you mean by "Free in both senses"? At 04:15 PM 18/04/2002 +0100, Martyn Ranyard wrote: >I know there's scanlite, but that doesn't seem to be Free in both senses, >so is there a Java/MacOS Free sane client? > > >Martyn Ranyard >Free Software Advocate > >icq - 122500800 >irc - Joran on OPN

[sane-devel] backend/test.c

2002-04-19 Thread
Hi, Current CVS sane-backends tree compiles fine now on OS/2. Thanks to all for committing the neccessary changes. Just one thing is missing: backend/test.c needs #include (because of F_SETFL) Regards Franz

[sane-devel] sane build on tru64 unix 5.1A

2002-04-19 Thread Ralph Angenendt
--Pk6IbRAofICFmK5e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 12:32:00PM -0700, Philip Goisman wrote: > checking for jpeg_start_decompress in -ljpeg... (cached) no >=20 > disabling DC210/DC240 backends

[sane-devel] MacOS client

2002-04-19 Thread Martyn Ranyard
Free as in freedom and free as in cost-free. As I understood it from the website, scanlite seems to be a "free download" but no source code, or freedom to redistribute/modify. e.g. GNU GPL Martyn At 06:10 AM 4/19/02 +1000, Mick Barry wrote: >What do you mean by "Free in both senses"? > >At 04:1

[sane-devel] MacOS client

2002-04-19 Thread Mick Barry
Understood. Unfortunately I'd find it a bit hard to feed my family if I made all my work freely available :-) At 09:50 AM 19/04/2002 +0100, Martyn Ranyard wrote: >Free as in freedom and free as in cost-free. > >As I understood it from the website, scanlite seems to be a "free >download" but no

[sane-devel] MacOS client

2002-04-19 Thread Martyn Ranyard
Quite understandable, but as a member of the Association For Free Software, I cannot recommend it as a tool unless it is Free and Free, so I was wondering if there is an alternative. I am not implying that your tool is or is not good, but in the wider goals I want my software to be Free, and my

[sane-devel] MacOS client

2002-04-19 Thread Jonathan Buzzard
ranya...@lineone.net said: > Quite understandable, but as a member of the Association For Free > Software, I cannot recommend it as a tool unless it is Free and Free, > so I was wondering if there is an alternative. Try this page for NSane, which is an OpenStep interface for SANE. http://w

[sane-devel] MacOS client

2002-04-19 Thread Mick Barry
At 10:31 AM 19/04/2002 +0100, Martyn Ranyard wrote: >Quite understandable, but as a member of the Association For Free >Software, I cannot recommend it as a tool unless it is Free and Free, so I >was wondering if there is an alternative. I am not aware of one. >I am not implying that your tool

[sane-devel] Cannot run xsane 0.84 and 0.85 with the current CVS backends 1.0.7

2002-04-19 Thread Christian Fughe
Hi, On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > I have just committed a fix to CVS, so please test it. I testet it. That's it! Xsane is 100% operative now, at least for me. Thank you for the fast fix, Christian Fughe

[sane-devel] Re: sane build on tru64 unix 5.1A

2002-04-19 Thread Philip Goisman
Hi, Thanks to Henning and Ralph for their response on the problem I'm having getting jpeg recognized. It responds the same even when I wipe out the sane-backends-1.0.7 completely and recreate it. distclean does the same. checking for jpeg_start_decompress in -ljpeg... no disabl

[sane-devel] Re: sane build on tru64 unix 5.1A

2002-04-19 Thread Major A
> Thanks to Henning and Ralph for their response on the > problem I'm having getting jpeg recognized. > > It responds the same even when I wipe out the > sane-backends-1.0.7 completely and recreate it. distclean > does the same. > > checking for jpeg_start_decompress in -ljpeg... no

[sane-devel] backend/test.c

2002-04-19 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:20:14AM +0200, Franz Bakan wrote: > backend/test.c needs > > #include Thanks. Fixed in CVS. Bye, Henning

[sane-devel] Xsane save to postscript problem

2002-04-19 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:26:39PM +0200, Oliver Rauch wrote: > I use xv to test if ps files look ok. xv does display the defined > bounding box. I think gv tries to display it on a page and does not > take accurate values from the bounding box. I don't think it's a bounding box problem. If I

[sane-devel] HP scanner headaches, addendum

2002-04-19 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:40:02PM -0700, Bob Sully wrote: > In my last post concerning the HP 6300 with XPA, I forgot to note that I > had set the debug level to 5 as Peter had suggested previously, and got > this: > > [rcs@titanic: ~]$ xsane > [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of hp to 5.

[sane-devel] Xsane save to postscript problem

2002-04-19 Thread
> A boundingbox is a part of the definition/syntax of postscript files. A boundingbox defines the location of the image in a postscript file? Let me clear up my last post. I was in a hurry and things got messy. When I convert the postscript files from xsane to the tiff images required by the fa

[sane-devel] Re: sane build on tru64 unix 5.1A

2002-04-19 Thread Philip Goisman
Hi Major, I wasn't avoiding you, just busy. Sorry you needed to repost. Anyhow, results from nm follow: # nm -B libjpeg.a | grep jpeg_start 0x00 T jpeg_start_compress 0x00 T jpeg_start_decompress 0x0005a0 T jpeg_start_output So, unless the programs looki

[sane-devel] Re: sane build on tru64 unix 5.1A

2002-04-19 Thread Frank Zago
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Philip Goisman wrote: > Hi Major, > > I wasn't avoiding you, just busy. Sorry you needed to repost. May be it's not finding the include file. Have you checked config.log? Frank.