Hi,
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 20:38, Kenneth H. Peters wrote:
> I am using the following:
> * IXP425 Big-endian
> * MontaVista 2.4.18 kernel
> * SANE 1.0.14
> * Plustek backend
> * Scanimage as frontend
> * Canon LiDE 30
> * USB 1.1
> Issue: Able to scan with "-mode Gr
Hi,
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 20:38, Kenneth H. Peters wrote:
> I am using the following:
> * IXP425 Big-endian
> * MontaVista 2.4.18 kernel
> * SANE 1.0.14
> * Plustek backend
> * Scanimage as frontend
> * Canon LiDE 30
> * USB 1.1
>
in my first post, I missed the "Bi
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, scott fagg wrote:
> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 06:25:57 +1000
> From: scott fagg
> To: Oliver Schwartz
> Cc: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Subject: Re: [sane-devel] epson 2580 problems
>
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Oliver Schwartz wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 20:26:57 +02
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 10:44:47PM +0200, Karsten Festag wrote:
> The Genius ColorPage-EP is a OEM version of the Microtek Scanmaker V300. It
> has an additional firmware peculiarity I had to handle so that the support is
> good, like the V300.
> I attach the updated microtek2.desc file. I c
--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 10:44:47PM +0200, Karsten Festag wrote:
> .../sanei/libsanei.a(sanei_config.o): In function `sanei_config_read':
> sanei_config.o(.text+0x36): undefined reference to `__ctype_b_loc'
>
I have been wrestling with this for a while now, and not turning up
much through searching the web. I have installed SANE
sane-backends-1.0.14 and have a CANON lide30 scanner.
At low resolutions it will process fine. If I go to 300 is fails at
about 75% and anyhting higher wont even start.
I ha
Hi,
> Using the latest drivers helps and i can now scan, however preview
> doesn't work. At least i can get an image out of it now.
>
> It seems to only preview either the area of the most recent scan or
> nothing, and then stretches that image vertically to fit the A4
> scannable area and shows t
some more tests get me some new results.
1 - I have noticed that with 3 different USB 2.0 cards, that the
scanner will not register itself as a USB 2.0 device, it only
registers as a 1.1 (CD Wiriters register as 2.0, so I know that the
card and the kernel are recognizing it properly)
2 - I moved
Hi,
>
> Check what the dwarfs are doing inside your computer :-)
> I've never seen such an error message.
>
> > /usr/i486-suse-linux/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: Invalid or unhandled FORM
> Does the same happen after "make distclean; ./configure; make"?
>
The dwarfs went back to work after "make dist
Hi ,
In my box I have Redhat 9.
I must connect via SCSI Interface Umax Mirage II scanner.
SCSI adapter is Acard AEC-6712TU.
During startup of computer the following communique appears:
ROM Address: C800h
I/O Port : 1000h
IRQ Number :11(level)
SCANNING SCSI DEVICE
ID=
Chris McKeever wrote:
> some more tests get me some new results.
>
> 1 - I have noticed that with 3 different USB 2.0 cards, that the
> scanner will not register itself as a USB 2.0 device, it only
> registers as a 1.1 (CD Wiriters register as 2.0, so I know that the
> card and the kernel are recog
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 05:07:46PM -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
> The manufacturer says that it does 1200x2400 optically, but xsane only
> offers a listbox that says a single value from 0 to 2400, no XXXxYYY
> choices, so I picked 2400 just to go for a worst case scenario but I have
> no id
jurek Ela Tryjarscy wrote:
> Hi ,
> In my box I have Redhat 9.
> I must connect via SCSI Interface Umax Mirage II scanner.
> SCSI adapter is Acard AEC-6712TU.
> Linux System logs contain:
>
> Oct 4 19:19:05 localhost kernel:ACARD AEC-671X PCI Ultra/W SCSI-3
> Host Adapter: 0IO:1000, IRQ
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 23:19:27 +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 05:07:46PM -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
> > The manufacturer says that it does 1200x2400 optically, but xsane only
> > offers a listbox that says a single value from 0 to 2400, no XXXxYYY
> > choices
> It's only at about 10 or 15% progress after 20 minutes so I'll send
still cranking away
just over 50%
Now I wish I'd used the time command so I can see just how long this will
take even if I go out to eat and it finishes while I'm gone. Then we could
look at the total data and total time and
> I am trying to get in touch with the coolscan2 backend author but I got
> no replies neither to private emails, neither in this list.
> I even checked that his last commit is dated january 2003, so I am
> wondering if he is still working at this project.
Sorry for not replying, I've had a busy t
well - did some more testing - downgraded the RH 7.3 box to SANE
1.0.13 - same delay in in starting the scan (+2 min. @ 600 DPI).. I
think tried it on a slightly more powerful CPU and had the same
result. This is leaning me towards that the 2.6 kernel with its
implemenation of LIBUSB works a lot b
Brian K. White wrote:
>> It's only at about 10 or 15% progress after 20 minutes so I'll send
>
> still cranking away
> just over 50%
>
> Now I wish I'd used the time command so I can see just how long this
> will take even if I go out to eat and it finishes while I'm gone.
> Then we could look at t
18 matches
Mail list logo
