Hi Bob,
Please Cc: sane-devel so your "ordeal" gets archived.
bob writes:
> On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 09:39 +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
>> Hmm, log data looks fine to me. TPU area is reported fine. 48.26 mm
>> by 231.14 mm is big enough to scan a strip of 6 negatives (that's what
>> the prod
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 12:10 +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> Please Cc: sane-devel so your "ordeal" gets archived.
Will do.
> bob writes:
> > On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 09:39 +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> >
> >> Hmm, log data looks fine to me. TPU area is reported fine. 48.26 mm
> >>
Hi,
I am vision impaired and I can only use the console under Gnu/Linux.
I've tried to scan, doing:
scanimage -v --format tiff >outputfile.tif
It works but the scanner only picks a portion of 248x256 pixels at
24-bit, while there is no any option mentionned in the man page to tell
scanimage tha
Aldo- the options for paper size and scanning area are provided by the
'backend' which is a driver that talks to the scanner. scanimage is a
'frontend' which talks to you. try scanimage --help, which will tell the
frontend to list all the options the backend provides.
allan
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005
Hi
St?phane VOLTZ schrieb:
> Le Lundi 29 Ao?t 2005 20:01, Pierre Willenbrock a ?crit :
>
...
>>Next i'd like to rewrite genesys_read_ordered_data to be more
>>maintainable and able to convert the cis style planar data to "chunky"
>>data.
>>
>
> It is indeed a rather complicated fun
forget that you are running debian for a second, and just run:
scanimage --help
this will make the sane front-end (scanimage) display all the options that
the scanner backend (driver) provides.
oh- and respond to the whole list, not just to me...
allan
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Osvaldo La Rosa wro
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20050830/1ef1d6fe/attachment.html
From an...@pfeiffer.edu Tue Aug 30 20:16:22 2005
From: an...@pfeiffer.edu (m. allan noah)
Date: Tue Aug 30 20:16:44 2005
Subject: [sane-devel] /proc/bus/usb/001/002 , write permission cha
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:01:52PM -0400, Rayudu Addagarla wrote:
> I had to change to have write permissions to other like,
> -r--r--rw- 1 root root 57 2005-08-30 12:22 002
> then only as user i can see the device with scanimage -L
>
> Is this a common behavior? I expect to have only read pe
Rayudu Addagarla wrote:
> Hello
> When i run scanimage -L as user i dont see the devices.
> when i run as root i can see the devices.
> i set Debug on and i see plustek backend says open failed.
>
> sane-find-scanner gives that device is libusb:001:002
> The permission on the /proc/bus/usb/001
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 08:58:45PM +0100, Jonathan Hipkiss wrote:
> I hate to say it but everything works fine in Windows, 24bit colour,
> 600dpi full scan OK
Ok, I'll try to find out what's the difference between the Windows and
the Linux scan. However, this can take some time.
Bye,
Henn
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:01:52 -0400
Rayudu Addagarla wrote:
> Is this a common behavior? I expect to have only read perms and does
> not require write perms.
SANE has to ask the scanner to identify itself, and to be able to tell
it to scan. That requires write permission.
Martin
11 matches
Mail list logo
