Greetings,
I am looking for a midzise high speed scanner (similar to
Kodak i600) that will work well with SANE. I know there are
many out there. The question is which one will work well with
SANE and allow us to write an API to talk to SANE. I am
looking to automate the scan process via batch jo
... is it possible?
My setup:
- VMware Workstation 4.5.2 build-8848
- Host system: Fedora Core 4 with kernel 2.6.13-1.1526_FC4
- Guest system: Windows XP with SP2
- Scanner: AGFA Snapscan 1212U_2, running nicely with sane backend
version 1.0.15
I got saned running on the linux host, following th
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 05:24:10PM -0600, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
> I've read all the recommended introductory material (which is how I ended up
> on this list). I haven't gotten to the sane standard itself yet. That's next
> on my list. I'm assuming it's version 1 of the standard that I wan
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 07:03:52PM +0200, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
> ... is it possible?
I never tried but if this combination works like a normal TCP/IP
network I don't see why it shouldn't work.
> On the windows guest, I installed SaneTwain as well as xsane-win32.
> But neither xsane nor
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 03:58:16PM +0300, Anastas Giokov wrote:
> [sanei_usb] sanei_usb_read_bulk: trying to read 2 bytes
> [sanei_usb] : 00
>
> [sanei_usb] sanei_usb_read_bulk: wanted 2 bytes, got 1 bytes
Maybe the problem is
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 06:55:11PM +0200, Gilles wrote:
> I'd like to get advice on the EPSON Perfection 3490.
> Features (from the vendor):
> 48 bits
> 3200 dpi,
> CCD
> transparency adapter
> USB 2.0
>
> Does someone know whether it is supported?
The SANE scanner search engine
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 05:52:55PM +0200, up_l...@o2.pl wrote:
> Hello sane-devel,
>
> : Should work but has limited testing. Please contact me if you own such a
> device.
The development version of SANE says status "good" and no comments. I
got some positive reports about it so it seems to
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>
>>From Windows, run telnet on port 6566 of the Linux system. If it
> ansers, press return twice. This just was saned. If you got
> "connection refused" check security settings, firewall etc. Also check
> syslof for messages from saned.
Thanks, Henning,
telnet 192.1
On October 5, 2005 11:04, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 05:24:10PM -0600, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
> > I've read all the recommended introductory material (which is how I ended
> > up on this list). I haven't gotten to the sane standard itself yet.
> > That's next on
The never ending chronicle of the Mac OS X libusb port
Since I first started providing binary packages for libusb and sane
for MacOS X in 2003, several people started to report problems with
USB scanners that turned out to be related to problems in libusb.
Over time, with the help of concern
Greetings,
I am looking for a midzise high speed scanner (similar to
Kodak i600) that will work well with SANE. The question is
which one will work well with SANE and allow us to write an
API to talk to the scanner. I am looking to automate the
scan process via batch job..etc..
Any recommenda
Hello,
I have a Fujitsu M3093DG scanner connected via a Microtech USB-SCSI-DB25
cable to a Debian DNU/Linux testing system, with sane 1.0.16-2.
scanimage seems to talk to the scanner to some degree: it returns
reasonable error messages when the ADF is jammed or when there's nothing
in the feed
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>
>>From Windows, run telnet on port 6566 of the Linux system. If it
> ansers, press return twice. This just was saned. If you got
> "connection refused" check security settings, firewall etc. Also check
> syslof for messages from saned.
At least this gave me a clue
Hi,
I once started to write a driver for this scanner, which was quite
unstable and only supported greyscale scanning. Basically, it's a
modification of the ccd300 driver.
I'm always thankful if somebody wants to take over a part of the backend
by adding support for a scanner. However, this is qu
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> saned -d128
>
> This will print more debug output directly to stderr. It will be
> terminated after each connection has finished, however, so it's only
> useful for debugging.
Ok, after having set up saned correctly, also the debugging output looks
sane ...
Thank
On October 5, 2005 14:51, Jochen Eisinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I once started to write a driver for this scanner, which was quite
> unstable and only supported greyscale scanning. Basically, it's a
> modification of the ccd300 driver.
If you could pass on whatever code you had, if you still have it, i
16 matches
Mail list logo
