Imar -- I will try this, thanks.
dwh
Imar van Erven Dorens wrote:
> Hello Denis,
>
> I'm new to these mailing lists, so I hope I mail this alright.
> I had the same problem like you, though before my 3490 I was
> struggling to make an old canon scanner working with Xsane and learned
> a bit..
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 22:54 +0100, Oliver Schwartz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Is there anything I can do to help get the Transparency unit to
> > work?
>
> As far as I know the transparency unit of the 3490 works ok. The only
> thing not supported is the automatic film feeder of the 3590. Please
> make
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 12:00:30AM +0100, Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski wrote:
> sorry, I did not realize that there is a difference between current CVS
> and experimental.
Are you really sure that you use experimental now? :-)
Some of your errors occur for me with the normal CVS, but not wi
Henning Meier-Geinitz schrieb:
>
> I only get backtracking here with high load of the computer. However
> I can confirm the horizontal lines. Looks like something connected to
> backtracking at 16 bit doesn't fully work yet. I don't have
> these lines in 8 bit mode.
>
Those corrupted horizontal
I've seen this in 0.97 and 0.98. There's the option of scanning in 12-bit mode
instead of 8-bit, but it doesn't seem to work.
In my understanding of how it should work, if your scanner has 12/36 bit color
instead of 8/24 bit you should be able to use some of that added dynamic range
when scanning
