On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:38:14 +
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have a UMAX scanner in the SCSI bus, which is correctly detected as
> /dev/sg3. The .udevdb entry for this device is:
>
> P:/class/scsi_generic/sg3
> N:sg3
> S: scsi/host1/bus0/target5/lun0/generic
> M:21:3
> A:0
> R:0
Hi list,
I have a UMAX scanner in the SCSI bus, which is correctly detected as
/dev/sg3. The .udevdb entry for this device is:
P:/class/scsi_generic/sg3
N:sg3
S: scsi/host1/bus0/target5/lun0/generic
M:21:3
A:0
R:0
On boot /dev/sg3 is assigned to group cdrw. I have to manually chgrp it to
scanner
Thanks, really thanks I'll prove it
Diego
-Mensaje original-
De: sane-devel-boun...@lists.alioth.debian.org
[mailto:sane-devel-boun...@lists.alioth.debian.org]En nombre de Henning
Meier-Geinitz
Enviado el: Martes, 13 de Diciembre de 2005 11:51
Para: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Asun
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:22:58AM -0300, dmeret...@repsolypf.com wrote:
> Sorry for disturbing, but I would like to know if there are someone
> with experience in Agfa SnapScan 1212p (parallel). Or some place to
> go.
I just got the following mail about this scanner. As I don't have such
a
Hi,
Thanks everybody for the reactions. Even though I haven't solved the
backtracking problem yet, I now know a bit more. The exact name of the
scanner I'm using is indeed Trust Direct WebScan 19200 (see
http://www.trust.nl/products/product.aspx?artnr=12389). Apart from the
backtracking (which
Stef, can you send it?
Diego
-Mensaje original-
De: sane-devel-boun...@lists.alioth.debian.org
[mailto:sane-devel-boun...@lists.alioth.debian.org]En nombre de St?phane
VOLTZ
Enviado el: Martes, 13 de Diciembre de 2005 02:46
Para: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Asunto: Re: RV: [sane-de
..
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20051213/6b185f4e/attachment.pgp
From a...@suomi24.fi Tue Dec 13 11:41:21 2005
From: a...@suomi24.fi (amth)
Date: Tue Dec 13 11:57:21 2005
Su
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 08:39:35AM +0200, Lauri Pirttiaho wrote:
> I have no such technical information that I could
> say if CanoScan 3000F is sufficiently close to
> 3200F so that the same driver would work. In fact
According to our web page about the 3000, it uses Genesys Logic GL660+GL64
Hello,
I have no such technical information that I could
say if CanoScan 3000F is sufficiently close to
3200F so that the same driver would work. In fact
I doubt it. But it is possible to check the case,
if you could take an USB log of booting the scanner
and scanning a small image, I could take
Le Lundi 12 D?cembre 2005 20:35, dmeret...@repsolypf.com a ?crit?:
> All/Oliver, how can I do a logic analysis? should i make it on Windows or
> Linux?. I would like to write a driver, but, i never did it before, if you
> help me, we'll do it.
>
> Thanks
>
Hello,
what you can do i
10 matches
Mail list logo
