: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
> to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment
Hi,
On 2006-03-05 11:27, Farid Joubbi wrote:
> I would like to get some help with getting my scanner to work with the
> GenesysLogic backend. Are there any kind souls here that could help me?
> The scanner is a Plustek ScanCopy 115.
> Output of sane-find-scanner -q :
> found USB scanner (vendor=0
Hi,
On 2006-02-27 21:14, Farid Joubbi wrote:
> I am a owner of a Plustek ScanCopy 115. I really would like to use it in
> Linux.
Please provide the output of "sane-find-scanner -v -v" as root when
the scanner is plugged in.
> lsusb gives this:
> Bus 003 Device 005: ID 07b3:081c Plustek, Inc
I'l
Hi,
On 2006-02-27 12:38, sofian.t...@xuite.net wrote:
> when i run xsane 0.97 I have available devices:
> 1. Microtek Scan Maker 3600 [sm3600:1/2]
> 2. Microtek Scan Maker 3840 [sm3840:1/2]
What's the real name of your scanner?
> it seems that my xsane read two devices in the same port
Salut Farvil,
I am working on a backend for the MP750 scanner but haven't come very
far. Maybe the MP150 works somehow similar, I don't know. I suggest to
check out some usbsnoop-logs at http://cmp750.berlios.de/ and compare
them to yours. (usbsnoop runs on windows and logs the usb-data being
writt
], chip=GL841) at libusb:003:005
Thanks in advance.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20060305/323b4c40/attachment.htm
From j...@jon.demon.co.uk Sat Mar 4 22:47:03 2006
From: j
Hi,
> [snapscan] usb_read Only 64 bytes read
> [snapscan] usb_read: reading: 0x06 0x00 0x02 0x02 0x49 0x00 0x00
> 0x00 0x45 0x50 ...
> [snapscan] Read 64 bytes
> [snapscan] inquiry: snapscan_cmd command failed: Error during
> device I/O [snapscan] sane_snapscan_open: error in inquiry command:
Th
Hi,
> also with mac and official cd found in the box the scanner would go
> nut and block itself. i am clueless
> [snapscan] sense_handler: sense key: 0x04, asc: 0x00, ascq: 0x00,
> i1: 0x00, i2: 0x04 [snapscan] sense_handler: Hardware error. (0x00,
> 0x04)
> [snapscan] test_unit_ready: snapscan_