Stefan Leichter wrote:
Hi,
> sle@sle3:/usr/src/sane/test$
> cvs -d:pserver:anonym...@cvs.alioth.debian.org:/cvsroot/sane login
> Logging in to :pserver:anonym...@cvs.alioth.debian.org:2401/cvsroot/sane
> CVS password:
> cvs [login aborted]: reading from server: Connection reset by peer
> sle@sl
Hi,
I think the "pserver" access has been turned off for quite a while.
Set your CVS shell to "ssh" and try "ext":
export CVS_RSH=ssh
cvs -z3 -d "ext:alioth..."
This is explained in more detail on the SANE homepage.
Regards,
Ulrich Deiters
--
Prof. Dr. Ulrich K. Deiters __
hello,
ok i've done log of preview and i compress its output by bzip, its
weight approximately is 3.5MB.
should i send it at sane-delvel ? or directly to you :).
regards
Hello,
i'm unable to login into the cvs server with the information from
http://www.sane-project.org/cvs.html :
sle@sle3:/usr/src/sane/test$
cvs -d:pserver:anonym...@cvs.alioth.debian.org:/cvsroot/sane login
Logging in to :pserver:anonym...@cvs.alioth.debian.org:2401/cvsroot/sane
CVS password:
On Monday 11 December 2006 13:55, Dennis Meulensteen wrote:
> Hi all,
> this scanner is not on the SANE supported hardware list
Yes it is. I was looking in the wrong place!
> even though a
> Google search shows lots of people reporting this as working with SANE.
At least I got that part right...
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, ezzetabi wrote:
> Hi everyone, I am an owner of the Canon in subject.
>
> It is not supported by SANE atm, so I'd like to help implementing a driver
> for it.
>
> Unfortunately I never worked on large projects or commercial quality
> products, but studying at the university
On Monday 11 December 2006 13:55, Dennis Meulensteen wrote:
> Hi all,
> this scanner is not on the SANE supported hardware list even though a Google
> search shows lots of people reporting this as working with SANE.
> There is no additional info on the back-end site either.
>
> Does anyone know w
Hi all,
this scanner is not on the SANE supported hardware list even though a Google
search shows lots of people reporting this as working with SANE.
There is no additional info on the back-end site either.
Does anyone know whether this H/W will work properly? I can only get it second
hand, so t
> On Dec 8 15:34 Ulrich Deiters wrote (shortened):
>> Interesting! The incriminated C code looked perfectly innocent
>> to me (if the incrementing operation is carried out after all
>> assignments, as it should, there is no ambiguity).
>
> Perhaps "ambiguous" is not exactly the right word because
Hello,
On Dec 8 15:34 Ulrich Deiters wrote (shortened):
> Interesting! The incriminated C code looked perfectly innocent
> to me (if the incrementing operation is carried out after all
> assignments, as it should, there is no ambiguity).
Perhaps "ambiguous" is not exactly the right word because
Hello,
the experimental version of the lexmark backend works with models
identified
by 0x043d:0x007c (X1100) and 0x413c:0x5105 (Dell A920). Your model may be
the same than the A920, and with slight modifications, you could try the
experimental version.
However, before
Le jeudi 7 d?cembre 2006 22:59, Tymoteusz.Drozd a ?crit?:
> Hi I have done scan under windows and i have decode of usbsnoop.log.
>
> This log should contain only preview scan but im not sure that.
> Log may contain more then only preview scan and i dont know how
> decode.sh and cmd.sh work in such
12 matches
Mail list logo
