ipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080117/9755882e/attachment.patch
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sane-backends.fr.po-1.42.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 972 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-deve
I know nothing about the GL841, but the HP G4010 might be one (or so
check-usb-chip thinks).
we now have a user-provided usbsnoop attached to this bug report:
http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410366&aid=305050&group_id=30186
Could someone who has seen the protocol for this chip
well, i might have broken the rules a bit, but i went ahead and added
the backend. so far, this has been the only perk of the job :)
allan
On 1/17/08, m. allan noah wrote:
> On 1/16/08, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:41:15 -0500
> > "m. allan noah" wrote:
> >
> > > we are i
and its in. third time is the charm?
allan
On 1/17/08, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> One last fix spotted by Patrick.
>
> Plus a fix to check-po.awk : a space surreptitiously sneaked into the pattern
> being matched.
>
> Regards,
> Yann E. MORIN.
>
> --
> .-.-
only one string !
+msgstr "S??lectionne la baie contennant le document ? num??riser" =>
+msgstr "S??lectionne la baie contenant le document ? num??riser"
regards,
On 1/17/08, Fransiskus Sasongko wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm trying to do some scanning process with RICOH IS 410 SCSI. The operating
> system recognized the scanner. When I tried to scan using ACDSee it didn't
> work. There was something to do with TWAIN, and the scanner is not TWAIN
> device.
> Wh
On 1/16/08, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:41:15 -0500
> "m. allan noah" wrote:
>
> > we are in feature freeze for the pending release now, so it's too late
> > to get it in sane, unless we are willing to let the release date slip.
> > Since we anticipate more regular releases i
Le Wednesday 16 January 2008 18:30:41 Fran Alvarez, vous avez ?crit?:
> Ok, ok, It seemed to me that I was being crystal clear at my explanations,
> and I'm surprised that a community of OS developpers is so afraid about
> giving "high level details" about the topic, but I understand that perhaps
>
