[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-05 Thread stef
Le samedi 5 d?cembre 2009 15:58:42 Janusz S. Bie?, vous avez ?crit : > On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 Chris Berry wrote: > > Hello, > > > > As part of a project I am currently undertaking I am creating support > > for the opticbook 3600 under linux. > > [...] > > > I am assuming there are no other people

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-05 Thread Janusz S. Bień
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 Chris Berry wrote: > Hello, > > As part of a project I am currently undertaking I am creating support > for the opticbook 3600 under linux. [...] > I am assuming there are no other people working on this project so far > (if so please let me know!) There was an attempt

[sane-devel] Success report for Plustek OpticSlim 2400 plus

2009-12-05 Thread Mark Lamers V2S
-- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20091205/f9b237bf/attachment.htm>

[sane-devel] Fwd: "sane_read: Device busy" with Canon PIXMA MX310 and sane 1.0.20-4ubuntu3

2009-12-05 Thread Nicolas Martin
Le samedi 05 d?cembre 2009 ? 00:41 +0100, Rogier Eggers a ?crit : > Nicolas, indeed you fixed one bug earlier. And now it seems you fixed > the other one as well. Multi-page scans go smooth (see log). Great > work and thanks! Thanks Rogier, everything looks okay now in the log ;-) Nicolas

[sane-devel] Canon PIXMA MX330 working, with -x auto and -y auto bug; data here

2009-12-05 Thread q...@sonic.net
I tried to submit form at , but it gave the error "Es sind Fehler aufgetreten: Konfigurationsproblem Leider k?nnen Sie keinen weiteren Eintrag vornehmen, da die die Gesamtzahl m?glicher Eintr?ge erreicht wurde!", so I'm re-submitting

[sane-devel] Fwd: "sane_read: Device busy" with Canon PIXMA MX310 and sane 1.0.20-4ubuntu3

2009-12-05 Thread Nicolas Martin
Le jeudi 03 d?cembre 2009 ? 17:02 -0600, Chris Bagwell a ?crit : > > So your saying that, for you, running "make distclean; ./configure > --enable-pthread; make" doesn't correctly have USE_PTHREAD defined? Sorry for the confusion, using --enable-pthread makes indeed compilation to have USE_PTHRE

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-05 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20091205/af2c7956/attachment.pgp>