attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100520/a0730c51/attachment-0001.htm
2010/5/20 ?? bzongbzongbzong at 163.com:
Hi,
??? I have an old Uniscan D50 USB scanner, which was
produced by a Chinese company, Qinghua Ziguang.
I tried in Fedora 8/11/12, but it didn't work. Some useful
information, I think, is that when adding a line
usb 0x1606 0x0170
You are running a
the latest SANE.
Best regards,
Gernot Hassenpflug
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100520/169ddb32/attachment.htm
On Thursday 20 May 2010, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote:
2010/5/20 ?? bzongbzongbzong at 163.com:
Hi,
??? I have an old Uniscan D50 USB scanner, which was
produced by a Chinese company, Qinghua Ziguang.
I tried in Fedora 8/11/12, but it didn't work. Some useful
information, I think, is that
Hi,
I've started getting reports of regressions in epson2 in 1.0.21,
affecting a number of scanners.
Has anyone else been getting similar reports?
So far I've had reports about the Stylus 3200 and the Perfection 640
being totally broken and a divide-by-zero bug in the options handling
code.
On Thursday 20 May 2010 16:39:46 Gernot Hassenpflug wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Ondrej Zary linux at rainbow-software.org
wrote:
On Thursday 20 May 2010, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote:
2010/5/20 ?? bzongbzongbzong at 163.com:
This is from Uniscan D50 windows INF files:
; UMAX
-devel/attachments/20100520/2e1407a2/attachment.htm
Thanks for the samples. I've never seen this particular problem before.
I'll
have to take a crack at seeing if I can reproduce this to make 100% sure
it's not an issue with your hardware. You'll have to hang tight before I
can
find an Artisan 710 and some free time to investigate.
I
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: artifacts.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20925 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100520/b79615ef/attachment-0002.jpg
-- next part --
A non-text
I'm trying to create scans that I can consider neutral. I'd like to
make adjustments to the scanned images after that, but keeping the
neutral copy as a reference. I'm not adjusting any settings in xsane
besides increasing the resolution to 600x600, so I'm not using color
management and my gamma
imperfect calibration.
allan
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Grant emailgrant at gmail.com wrote:
I always scan the front and back of new CDs I buy. ?I'm noticing
strange vertical lines on all of the reflective surfaces on the back
of my CDs with my Epson Artisan 710. ?This didn't happen
imperfect calibration.
allan
Could you tell me a little more? Can I fix the calibration or is this
something that can only be done at the factory?
- Grant
I always scan the front and back of new CDs I buy. ?I'm noticing
strange vertical lines on all of the reflective surfaces on the back
Not at all. I've seen two different units of the same scanner give
very different tone scans with the same options set. You need a
reference target to scan.
allan
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Grant emailgrant at gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to create scans that I can consider neutral. ?I'd
Not at all. I've seen two different units of the same scanner give
very different tone scans with the same options set. You need a
reference target to scan.
allan
But color management can be used after the fact, right? I'd like to
have a reference copy of everything I scan that I can apply
14 matches
Mail list logo
