t;http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100907/87d68753/attachment.obj>
Am Dienstag, 7. September 2010, um 21:37:26 schrieb Nicolas Martin:
> Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 ? 19:47 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug a ?crit :
> > I now have a problem where the pixels also need to be rearranged
> > vertically. In particular, the first half of a line corresponds to the
> > second hal
Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 ? 19:47 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug a ?crit :
> Dear all,
>
> I am working on the pixma backend for Canon devices (variation:
> pixma_mp150.c), and have a question about registration of pixels in
> the y dimension.
>
> Each backend I believe has variations on a _fill_buff
Dear all,
I am working on the pixma backend for Canon devices (variation:
pixma_mp150.c), and have a question about registration of pixels in
the y dimension.
Each backend I believe has variations on a _fill_buffer
function called between _scan and <>_finish_scan.
The function reads sections of
d the
backend from
http://www.ellert.se/PKGS/sane-backends-2010-01-17/10.6/sane-backends.pkg.tar.gzThanks
for all pointers,Philip Chang
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/san
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Al Bogner wrote:
> Am Di, 07 Sep 2010 10:07:24 CEST schrieb Gernot Hassenpflug:
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Al Bogner
>> wrote:
>> > Am Mo, 06 Sep 2010 22:55:55 CEST schrieb Gernot Hassenpflug:
>> >
>> > Should lsusb show any info of the scanner? /../
>>
>>
Hello,
On Sep 6 11:33 m. allan noah wrote (shortened):
>
> Very close- just one correction: sane-find-scanner lists all the
> devices attached to the system which might be a scanner, including
> ones which are not supported by sane, and ones that are supported but
> drivers are not installed.
>
>
Am Di, 07 Sep 2010 15:52:36 CEST schrieb Gernot Hassenpflug:
Hi Gernot,
> >> > Should lsusb show any info of the scanner? /../
> >>
> >> Yes, certainly, just like any other USB device. /../
> >
> > I tried 2 pcs and 2 USB-cables, so the chance that there is a
> > hardware problem with the scanner
Trying to get the plustek 9636T work
on an Ubuntu 10.04 500MHz x86 installation,
but it fails during detection. With
export SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK_PP=255 set,
scanimage run with root permissions says:
[...]
[plustek_pp] attach (parport0, 0xbf84e5e0, (nil))
[plustek_pp] Device configuration:
[plustek_p
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Al Bogner wrote:
> Am Mo, 06 Sep 2010 22:55:55 CEST schrieb Gernot Hassenpflug:
>
>> Hi, quick message only: 9000F is working, only needs 9600dpi
>> resolution in TPU mode implemented correctly /../
>
> Should lsusb show any info of the scanner? I have problems with
There have been a couple of attempts to extend sanei_usb, but I don't
know if it ever produced working code.
allan
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 8. August 2010, 19:21:31 schrieb Ilia Sotnikov:
>> Several months ago almost finished implementing the backen
Am Di, 07 Sep 2010 10:07:24 CEST schrieb Gernot Hassenpflug:
Hi Gernot,
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Al Bogner
> wrote:
> > Am Mo, 06 Sep 2010 22:55:55 CEST schrieb Gernot Hassenpflug:
> >
> >> Hi, quick message only: 9000F is working, only needs 9600dpi
> >> resolution in TPU mode implemen
12 matches
Mail list logo
