Is this the latest and last word on suport (or rather the lack thereof)
for the Epson V500?
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2010-January/025872.html
If so, this is kind-of depressing, because I'm on FreeBSD, not Linux.
Is it really (still) the case that in order to make
Ronald F. Guilmette rfg at tristatelogic.com writes:
Is this the latest and last word on suport (or rather the lack thereof)
for the Epson V500?
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2010-January/025872.html
If so, this is kind-of depressing, because I'm on FreeBSD, not
Hello,
In the past I posted about building for Windows. I had SANE 1.0.21
working fine. Today I have tried to build 1.0.22 and test it. The build
works fine, but when I use the resulting DLL the scanner cannot be seen.
Switching back to the 1.0.21 DLL makes the scanner visible again.
Is there
In message 87fwi43zbq.fsf at avasys.jp,
Olaf Meeuwissen olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote:
WRT FreeBSD support, may I suggest you submit a support request[2] so we
get concrete info on how badly people want this.
I'm not sure that I understand your request. Could you elaborate?
I mean I
My epjitsu backend speaks to some Epson-based Fujitsu machines. I
suppose it is possible that the v500 could be related, and a modified
version could be produced.
allan
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com wrote:
In message 87fwi43zbq.fsf at avasys.jp,
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Michael Cronenworth mike at cchtml.com wrote:
Hello,
In the past I posted about building for Windows. I had SANE 1.0.21 working
fine. Today I have tried to build 1.0.22 and test it. The build works fine,
but when I use the resulting DLL the scanner cannot be
On 11/04/2011 07:49 PM, Chris Bagwell wrote:
I can't comment much on this part. Lots of changes occurred.
OK. I'll keep investigating, but I don't have a lot of time to invest in
it so since 1.0.21 works I may stick with that.
I've had your patches sitting in my inbox since 2009. Never got
