Hi!
I have a Canon MF8330 multifunctional device..
Initially, sane-find-scanner reported:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon,Inc.], product=0x2708
[MF8330]) at libusb:001:010
But sane didn't support it, so scanimage didn't work.
I noticed that pixma_imageclass.c has (untested) support for
This machine uses a new command 'e5' instead of the traditional 'd5'
command used by older canon dr machines. The contents of these
commands are unknown. So, I need you to make some more logs in
windows. You will need to change one setting, make a scan, save the
log, clear the log, and change the s
On 11/30/2011 04:53 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
> Are you sure you are really running your modified version of the
> backend? have you enabled debugging at runtime?
>
I use prefix in ./configure and then in the folder I install it i run
./scanimage so I should be using my modified version as far as I
gt;
> Would you be so kind and hint out some documentation related to the
> process of reverse-engineering of these devices?
>
> V.
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/2030/04c4566e/attachment.html>
On 11/29/2011 07:09 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
> I would suggest that you NOT start with making options and such.
> Instead, just hard-code the call to set the data in the scanner,
> whenever the tpu is enabled/disabled. Once you have that working, then
> try to make it user selectable.
I switched
mf8030
or mf4010.
Would you be so kind and hint out some documentation related to the process
of reverse-engineering of these devices?
V.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20111130/9bfbc
SANE_DEBUG_EPSON2=255 scanimage [args here] 2>tpu.log
then look in tpu.log
allan
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Martin Zackrisson
wrote:
> On 11/30/2011 04:53 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
>>
>> Are you sure you are really running your modified version of the
>> backend? have you enabled debuggin
Are you sure you are really running your modified version of the
backend? have you enabled debugging at runtime?
allan
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Martin Zackrisson
wrote:
>
>
> On 11/29/2011 07:09 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
>>
>> I would suggest that you NOT start with making options and suc
Thank you. I will look at it tonight.
allan
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Furio Settimi
wrote:
> I am slowly because have only one pc with microsoft
> sorry
>
> Furio
>
>
> Il 30/11/2011 02:22, m. allan noah ha scritto:
>
>> Can you make a log of the scanner actually making a scan? Maybe lo
