In short: it works rudimentary with commandline tool, but gives an error
with XSANE.
Hello,
I tried to get a new Canon Pixma MX375 working on my Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit
sytem. Because of the need of the pixma-backend in version 0.17.0 I
installed SANE 1.0.23 from git.
The command
$sane-find-scann
On (08:28 22/08/12), David Woodfall put forth the
proposition:
>On (21:51 21/08/12), m. allan noah put forth the
>proposition:
>>What foreign address is it listening for? Should be 0.0.0.0:*
>
>Yes it is.
>
>>allan
>>
>>On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:37 PM, David Woodfall
>>wrote:
>>>On (20:09 21/
ttp://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20120823/5684bc96/attachment.html>
inclusions of this file are no-ops unless JMESSAGE is
defined */
#define JMESSAGE(code,string)
#endif /* JMESSAGE */
Glen
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20120823/6cc50
d from his GPLed code. He seems to be still at lsus.edu .
Regards
Michael
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SaneReflecta.zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 35234 bytes
Desc: SaneReflecta.zip
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20120823/c2461722/attachment-0001.zip>
I've not had time to review the code, but It sounds like you guys are
on the right track. You now know more about the pie backend that most
people, so you are in the best position to judge the common vs
separate backend issue. Either is choice is acceptable. Regarding the
license, the sane exceptio
- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20120823/62db19d8/attachment.html>
