-
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20121102/3dd26960/attachment.html>
.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20121102/8763674f/attachment-0001.html>
Hello,
I am wondring if something has changed in the API to the pnm driver.
I'm running Sane 1.0.22 on Mac OS X and the command line scanimage
works fine with the PNM driver at index 0 (pnm:0).
But when I access it through the Sane.pm Perl interface to sane I get
no data on the read() call. The
Can you try to get some debug logs of the backend, to compare the two programs?
SANE_DEBUG_PNM=255 scanimage ... 2> scanimage.log
SANE_DEBUG_PNM=255 perlprog ... 2> perlprog.log
Maybe the perl code needs an additional call somewhere, or maybe there
is a bug in the backend.
allan
On Fri, Nov 2,
OK. I'm going to have to set-up a separate test program for the Perl
part because the calls are embedded in some complex code. Will be back
shortly...
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:04 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
> Can you try to get some debug logs of the backend, to compare the two
> programs?
>
> SANE
-
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: scanimage.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3710 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20121102/1e0b6bfa/attachment.obj>
-- next part ------
A non-text at
What happens if you call sane_get_parameters in your perl code, after
sane_start?
allan
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:04 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
>> Can you try to get some debug logs of the backend, to compare the two
>> programs?
>>
>> SANE
I think I solved it, and it has to do with the maxlen param on the
read(). If I use (0) it fails but if I use 32768 it works. On other
scanners the 0 is equivalent to the maxlength but in the PNM it seems
to need to be explicit.
--
Alejandro Imass
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Alejandro Imass
Hi all,
I tried to report unsupported device via
http://www.meier-geinitz.de/tinc?key=rDoQ7lrj&formname=adddev
but it fails with some error written in German language which I don't
understand.
So, I am trying to report unsupported device via this mail list - sorry,
if it is wrong place or my repo
sys 0m5.888s
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 283 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20121102/3961f099/attachment.pgp>
; <mailto:sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org>
>
>
Hello,
I have added a doxygen configuration file in doc/ . After
./configure, you can cd to doc/ and run 'doxygen doxygen-genesys.conf',
it will create a genesys-html/ subdirectory with html documentation. It
should help you understand of to use the frontend struct.
Regards,
Stef
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20121102/001dec9a/attachment.html>
Hi,
we are trying to get a GL846 based scanner to work - Canon Image
Formula Flatbed Scanner Unit 101.
I'm new to sane and scanners, so please excuse me if I'm asking some
simple/stupid questions.
Any pointers to documentation of any sort will be appreciated.
So, I've captured a scan under windo
On 02/11/2012 20:26, Ale? Nesrsta wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I tried to report unsupported device via
> http://www.meier-geinitz.de/tinc?key=rDoQ7lrj&formname=adddev
> but it fails with some error written in German language which I don't
> understand.
>
> So, I am trying to report unsupported device via
Stef p??e v P? 02. 11. 2012 v 22:16 +0100:
> On 02/11/2012 20:26, Ale? Nesrsta wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I tried to report unsupported device via
> > http://www.meier-geinitz.de/tinc?key=rDoQ7lrj&formname=adddev
> > but it fails with some error written in German language which I don't
> > understa
On 02/11/2012 20:20, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> I think I solved it, and it has to do with the maxlen param on the
> read(). If I use (0) it fails but if I use 32768 it works. On other
> scanners the 0 is equivalent to the maxlength but in the PNM it seems
> to need to be explicit.
>
Hello,
OK. We thought that 0 was equivalent to max length on that arch.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Stef wrote:
> On 02/11/2012 20:20, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>>
>> I think I solved it, and it has to do with the maxlen param on the
>> read(). If I use (0) it fails but if I use 32768 it works. On othe
On 02/11/2012 21:26, Ale? Nesrsta wrote:
> Stef p??e v P? 02. 11. 2012 v 22:16 +0100:
>> On 02/11/2012 20:26, Ale? Nesrsta wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I tried to report unsupported device via
>>> http://www.meier-geinitz.de/tinc?key=rDoQ7lrj&formname=adddev
>>> but it fails with some error written i
17 matches
Mail list logo
