Hey stef,
I see things seem to be progressing well with the lide 110, good times!
I have recently had a problem with the account I set up the mailing list
with so I have added this account instead. I doubt there will have been
any progress on the plustek drivers, but as I've missed some of the
Cheers Allan, Stef said hes gonna give the code a thorough look through
in a week or so, should be plenty of time for the next release if it is
around your proposed time.
Thanks
Chris
On 06/12/10 15:08, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Chris Berry wrote:
>
>
Thanks Stef, a week is no problem for me, i'm pretty busy at work at the
minute so a weeks time might work out best for all of us.
Chris
On 06/12/10 19:53, stef wrote:
> Le Monday 06 December 2010 15:54:44 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>>> Chris, please go ahead. I th
> Chris, please go ahead. I think you could remove some of my "Chris
> why" comments where you know. Should the scanner be added also to the
> genesys.conf
Definitely here
> and libsane.rules files?
I have never entered in this file, what was the reason behind adding to
it? Or at least what do
Hey guys,
So I have looked at Michael's code and tested it with my scanner. Good news is
this works and is nice and neat (you have saved me a shitty job there Michael).
I think it is probably time we committed this to the SANE repository so we
should stop developing the version in Michaels patc
Hey all,
Sorry for my absence any of those who were waiting on the support for
this scanner, I had a massive internet problem then started a new job so
things got held back. A quick update to the project: I managed to get
most of the basic functionality together in my test bed, which still
wor
Hi Stef, I take it that you have now received my preliminary copy of my
report. I will send you a completed copy when I am done.
I have a question about the image scans at 1200+ dpi. When attempting
scans at these resolutions I only get half an image. A little
investigation has led me to find t
stef wrote:
> Le lundi 22 mars 2010 07:26:23 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Hi guys, I have included a patch for the plustek 3600. It isnt quite
>> there yet but at least you can apply it to the current development
>> version and should be able to test (for those
I know this was discussed about 6 weeks ago but is there any update on
when the next SANE release will be? Would be nice to know a rough date
or at least if progress is being made
Thanks
Chris
stef wrote:
> Hello,
>
> for the image quality, I think you could concentrate on on full sensor
> resolution and 'half ccd' resolution.
I'm not sure what you mean but I guess full resolution is the maximum
hardware resolution of the scanner? If so then what is 'half ccd'
resolution?
> Le jeudi 18 mars 2010 07:21:10 Yevgeny Gromov, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Hi everyone!
>> In archive I've read that some years ago someone have developed backend for
>> Plustek OpticPro S28 based on GL841.
>> Is there any alpha support for this scanner or should I write modification
>> of sane-g
> Hello,
>
> in order to properly review the result of your hard work, we need the
> changes
> you done as patches. Either against the version you started to modify, or as a
> git patchset against latest version, which is the best solution. On your site,
> I only found the full source
On 03/09/2010 05:15 AM, stef wrote:
> Le lundi 8 mars 2010 17:20:23 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Ok Stef I have a bit more time to concentrate on this at the minute. I
>> have updated the white_shading.pnm and included it at
>> http://sites.google.com/site/bez62
hanks
Chris
On 03/05/2010 07:26 PM, stef wrote:
> Le jeudi 4 mars 2010 17:13:12 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> On 03/03/2010 06:03 AM, stef wrote:
>>
> ...
>
>> Ok thanks guys, this seems to have done the trick! There is now a black
>> line down
On 03/03/2010 06:03 AM, stef wrote:
> Le mardi 2 mars 2010 16:40:21 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Hey guys, I resolved the issue I was having with the dark_shading
>> calibration. The lamp was turning off fine but the | REG03_LAMPPWR in
>> gl842_begin_scan was t
Hey guys, I resolved the issue I was having with the dark_shading
calibration. The lamp was turning off fine but the | REG03_LAMPPWR in
gl842_begin_scan was turning the light back on for the scan :/ . Having
resolved this there is still a black line down the center of the page.
The black_shadin
On 02/24/2010 10:33 AM, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> stef schrieb:
>
>> Le mercredi 24 f?vrier 2010 03:00:16 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>>
>>> Hey Stef,
>>>
>>> I think I have sorted out the white shading data but the black is still
>
Hey Stef,
I think I have sorted out the white shading data but the black is still
a mystery. I have uploaded some files to the project site (here
http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update240210 ) these are
at shading lines set to 400 but for the scan to work even a little bit I
need
stef wrote:
> Le lundi 22 f?vrier 2010 15:09:11, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> On 02/22/2010 06:43 AM, stef wrote:
>>
>>> Le lundi 22 f?vrier 2010 02:09:14 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>>>
> ...
>
>> Hey Stef,
>>
>> Than
On 02/22/2010 06:43 AM, stef wrote:
> Le lundi 22 f?vrier 2010 02:09:14 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Hey Stef,
>>
>> I think I have isolated the gamma tables from the logs but there is a
>> significant difference; the gamma tables all seem to be sent at onc
Hey Stef,
I think I have isolated the gamma tables from the logs but there is a
significant difference; the gamma tables all seem to be sent at once to
the scanner. Regs 0x5b and 0x5c are both set to 0x00 and 1536 bytes are
sent to the scanner. I have attached the log file appearances of the
g
> Hello,
>
> regarding the gamma values you can extract the gamma tables sent to your
> scanner by the windows driver from USB logs. Put them in a spreadsheet, then
> you can insert the formula used by the genesys backend and compare the
> reference and generated curves.
>
I am no
On 02/12/2010 08:47 AM, stef wrote:
> Le jeudi 11 f?vrier 2010 19:50:25, vous avez ?crit :
>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am facing the same issues than you while adding support for the
>>> HP3670. I eventually found that one of my decoding script was buggy and
>>> hide most of AFE accesses. I
> Hello,
>
> I am facing the same issues than you while adding support for the
> HP3670. I
> eventually found that one of my decoding script was buggy and hide most of AFE
> accesses. I have appended the fixed version. By decoding usbsnoop again, you
> may find more AFE writes to be c
Glaw wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-09 17:05:15 +0000, Chris Berry
> wrote:
>
>> Ok so ive managed to fix the problem with the FLAG being set, the
>> REG01_DVDSET part was screwing me up, so im not sure what that was
>> about... More details are here
>> http://sites
Ok so ive managed to fix the problem with the FLAG being set, the
REG01_DVDSET part was screwing me up, so im not sure what that was
about... More details are here
http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update090210 with a new
attachment of the scanning image.
The scans now have a red t
Hey Stef, did you manage to have a look at the patch I sent you? I
havent had much time to look at the project over the last few days so
not much has happened, i'm still getting black scans from the scanner
when I remove the NO_CALIBRATION flag. Have you any idea which function
will be causing
On 02/02/2010 05:29 AM, stef wrote:
> Le lundi 1 f?vrier 2010 13:52:30 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> On 01/31/2010 09:21 PM, stef wrote:
>>
>>> Le dimanche 31 janvier 2010 20:30:58 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>>>
>>>> Ok
On 01/31/2010 09:21 PM, stef wrote:
> Le dimanche 31 janvier 2010 20:30:58 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Ok Stef, ignore that last email, I just got a scan! its far from perfect
>> but im on the right road at least (mostly your advice ;) ). One of my
>> GPIO was
Ok Stef, ignore that last email, I just got a scan! its far from perfect
but im on the right road at least (mostly your advice ;) ). One of my
GPIO wasnt set correctly and you were right about the bit 8 being set on
the control reg of the AFE.
An upload of the image is at
http://sites.google.c
On 01/31/2010 01:11 PM, stef wrote:
> Le samedi 30 janvier 2010 15:29:50 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
> Hello,
>
> the function you wrote is fine. What I wanted to share is that it is
> easier
> to do experiments from within a really simple test progra
On 01/30/2010 01:40 PM, stef wrote:
> Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 11:26:56 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> No stef im almost certain this isnt a Wolfson, from an old project page
>> I think it is an Analog Digital 9826
>>
>> Link:
>> http://w
No stef im almost certain this isnt a Wolfson, from an old project page
I think it is an Analog Digital 9826
Link:
http://www.analog.com/en/audiovideo-products/cameracamcorder-analog-front-ends/ad9826/products/product.html
I too am puzzled why there are so many writes to the frontend, the XP2
Hey stef, i'm really struggling to work out what all these frontend
writes are for. Below is a grep of the frontends from a scan, I have
done several scans and they all roughly follow this format. I'm not sure
why the offset (regs 05 - 07) have values 0x80 and 0xff and the values
for both offse
stef wrote:
> Le vendredi 22 janvier 2010 17:57:06 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Hey Stef, I had to take a little time off the front end stuff to do some
>> documentation but Im looking at it again now. Like you im fairly certain
>> everything else is set, could y
milar pattern to the opticbook 3600.
Cheers
Chris
stef wrote:
> Le vendredi 15 janvier 2010 14:19:15 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Hi Stef, in the course of trying to get the lamp working I was playing
>> with the settings and after I removed my changes the lamp functions
pointers are greatly appreciated
Thanks
Chris
On 01/15/2010 01:10 PM, stef wrote:
> Le jeudi 14 janvier 2010 17:47:41 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Ok quick update, I have managed to get the lamp on during scans! The
>> reason it was failing is because reg[0x01] was hard
Ok quick update, I have managed to get the lamp on during scans! The
reason it was failing is because reg[0x01] was hard coded to CIS type
and this is a CCD scanner. Hopefully this means that all I have to do is
polish up the remaining register values at init time.
Currently the light is on whe
Ok I have set the values for the 0x6b and im still getting a completely
black scan but the lamp is being turned off at the start of a scan.
When the scanner is plugged in the light is ON and when i start a scan
the light is immediately turned off. The init reg is definitely sending
the correct
could be a
big break through for this project :)
Chris
stef wrote:
> Le jeudi 7 janvier 2010 15:14:20 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Hi Stef,
>>
>> I have updates on this project at
>> http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update070110 with some
>
lol no worries Jan, hopefully I can get the scanner working soon for you :)
Chris
On 01/07/2010 04:25 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-07 14:14:20 +0000, Chris Berry
> wrote:
>
>> I have updates on this project at
>> http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/u
Hi Stef,
I have updates on this project at
http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update070110 with some
attachments. I am still struggling to work out why the scan lamp is off
during scanning.
My thoughts are that maybe the genesys backend is saying the lamp sleep
mode if on before th
investigate the matter further.
Thanks
Chris
On 12/29/2009 07:46 AM, stef wrote:
> Le jeudi 24 d?cembre 2009 06:07:23 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Just a quick update, I had to take a little time off from the project
>> but I should be able to work on it more no
Just a quick update, I had to take a little time off from the project
but I should be able to work on it more now. I have an update at
http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update with new log files
for smaller scan and preview snoops.
Stef is there any chance you could explain the layo
Hi guys,
i'm a little bit stuck with what to do next. I have set up as suggested
in previous mails and now I have an image coming it but it is very
garbled. For image reference please see the project webpage
http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/firstattempts/run-genesys.pnm
. If someo
As an update I have added my progress to a weblisting with google. The
webpage can be found at
http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/home
Please see the first attempt post for recent logs, an example image from
the scanner and the code I added to genesys_devices.c. Any comments
would be welcome,
7 d?cembre 2009 19:30:15 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Ok I have managed to use SniffUSB to extract some data during the
>> calibration and preview stages, there is too much to post here but im
>> not sure how to interpret it. I have tried usb-robot but am struggling
installed?). Any advice of where to go from here would be great :)
Thanks
Chris
On 12/06/2009 10:07 PM, stef wrote:
> Le dimanche 6 d?cembre 2009 20:18:17 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Thanks for the info Stef, I have run sane-find-scanner on the scanner
>> and it confirms t
Thanks for the info Stef, I have run sane-find-scanner on the scanner
and it confirms that the chipset is indeed GL482. I was under the
impression the Genesys backend was for GL481, does it support GL482 as
well?
Thanks
Chris
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Hello,
As part of a project I am currently undertaking I am creating support
for the opticbook 3600 under linux. It seems the best approach to this
is to create a SANE backend for the scanner. After reading the available
documentation I am of the understanding that I should post to this
mailin
50 matches
Mail list logo
