Hi,
At this point, I dont think we want to enshrine anything as being part
of SANE2.
I didn't ment exactly SANE2, just next version, if there will be any.
Both #ifdef 0 in sane.h comments out code because following are for
later sane version, older frontends wont support and these are to be
Just for information for those who will google about Fujitsu ScanSnap
S500 on Linux (and most probably applies to other small like S510 and
maybe not so small scanners too).
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:13 AM, m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Ilm?rs
Hi,
I downloaded source from git repositories (sane-backends and sane-frontends)
and tired to compile them.
I have Ubuntu 9.10, needed dev library packages were there.
sane-backends configure, make, make install was fine.
sane-frontends configure failed.
I traced problem down to
Hi,
I'm running latest SANE from git source on Ubuntu 9.10. I was testing
scaning A4 on Fujitsu ScanSnap 500 in 300 dpi Color uncompressed using
scanadf. Everything is fine when scanning only one side of sheet (image size
24MB). But when scanning with ADF Duplex as source, scanner pauses 3 times
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Olaf Meeuwissen
olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote:
SANE_STATUS_WARMING_UP is one of the statusses that has been considered
for addition to the API. ?IIRC, sane-backends-1.0.21 would ship without
any API changes (and the #if 0 indicates that it will), so it
Hi,
As I understood code in sane.h commented out with #if 0 is for next
version SANE. Isn't it better to have one switch like SANE_API_2 in
sane.h instead of two #if 0? See patch to current git master in
attachment (previous patch I sent was other way round). Then there is
flexibility to switch
