Hi,
I've changed the test-backend, that way, that the reader-process now
terminates, when running as thread.
This change should allow to run the test-backend on MacOSX without
patching the sanei_thread lib.
Mattias, you might can check this. By removing your patch from the
MacOSX SANE-version,
Hi,
On Samstag, 17. Januar 2004 22:22, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 08:04:40PM +, Till Kamppeter wrote:
Is there a way to block the usage of the scanner.o module by means of
the SAME package (compile-time config or so)?
No and that wouldn't help. When the
, Mattias Ellert wrote:
Jaeger, Gerhard wrote:
Hi again,
I also think, that a working test-backend is not that essential, as
working real backends.
Here I must strongly disagree. A working test backend is extremely
essential. It is a very important tool in debugging.
If a frontend works
Hi again,
in the meantime (even Henning urged me to do something with that sanei_thread
stuff ;-) I've included Mattias patch within sanei_thread_kill() and checked
it here on my box with a CanoScan 650.
Result: It will not work - it hangs. Why? Because the plustek backend and
also the
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2004 20:17, Noah Daniels wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
Basically, sane-find-scanner finds the scanner, but scanimage -L does not.
However, if I set SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK to a high number, the scanner DOES
start working, and scans a partial low-res image before hanging. I know
On Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2004 18:51, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
True. Most man pages contain something like this:
Okay, okay, I got it ;-)))
The next version will contain this part.
ENVIRONMENT
SANE_CONFIG_DIR
This environment variable specifies the list of
Hi,
I already got this report and check it here on my box...
Ciao,
Gerhard
On Freitag, 9. Januar 2004 09:31, Mattias Ellert wrote:
Noah Daniels wrote:
Hi,
I'm still having the same problem with the plustek backend that several
people have reported, even using this latest build of the
Hi list,
finally we now have a backend called U12 which should support the following
scanner:
Plustek OpticPro U12
Plustek OpticPro UT12
Plustek OpticPro 1212U (all having the product-ID 0x0001)
also the
Genius ColorPage Vivid III V2 USB should work (Plustek vendor product id)
and
Genius HR6
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 31. Dezember 2003 18:10, m. allan noah wrote:
i am converting the fujitsu backend to use sanei_thread instead of fork.
okay - good ;-)
in reading the threading code, i found something that i dont understand,
and was hoping someone who knows a bit more could explain it to
Hi,
can you please upgrade to the latest CVS-version?
What about using xscanimage or xsane?
I don't have any problems here with that scanner (on a
X86 Linux box)
Ciao,
Gerhard
On Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2003 19:28, Henrik Rintala wrote:
Thanks for the informative answer.
found USB scanner
Hi,
I'm pretty shure, that the Visioneer 4400 does not contain a LM983x ASIC.
I checked some logs in spring this year, and there it turned out to be a
GeneSysLogic based device, at least containing a GL 640 bridge. The
ASIC is unknown to me, probably one of those E... ones - maybe Steven
Ellis
Hi,
On Dienstag, 25. November 2003 14:00, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi,
The Plustek OpticPro 1212U is currently not supported by SANE. :(
yes, that's true ;-)
However, by the looks of the chip numbers, it seems that this scanner
uses a parallel port chip (ASIC 98003) coupled to an
Hi Gene,
could it be, that something is broken by your dual kernel installation?
Did somebody know something 'bout changes in the usb interface?
Do we need to recompile the libusb stuff before using kernel 2.6?
It is also very suspicous that after setting the debug stuff you'll see
nothing.
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 6. November 2003 17:34, Yuri Dario wrote:
Hi,
It looks like you are getting the image data from scanimage on stdout
captured with the debug info on stderr.
this makes me think that the file handles are opened/closed in wrong order:
maybe this backend is using different
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2003 18:44, Rene Rebe wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
Hm - never arrived here :-( ?
Hmpf, maybe my problem
I also seem to miss the beginning of this thread :-( But I try to
track this issue soon - maybe a item in the BugTracker would be a
nice reminder ;-)
Yup, that's
Hi,
On Freitag, 10. Oktober 2003 18:14, Beat Birkhofer wrote:
With the latest corrections in sanei_thread.c the plustek backend works
fine on MacOSX :-)
good to hear ;-)
(In the end, that's what I excpected ;-
Let me know if there's anything special to test on OSX.
Nope, but thanx
On Freitag, 3. Oktober 2003 17:27, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Are there any new backends that should be included in 1.0.13?
What about the Genesys Logic stuff? Is it possible to include at least
some basic support?
Gerhard
On Montag, 4. August 2003 23:42, Timo Pylvänäinen wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
Well, I have 1260 Photo as well (which detects as GT-7300). I thought
the Photo was the same scanner as the non-Photo but with the TPU?
Because the transparcy unit is available as an extension to the normal
1260...
The 1260
On Samstag, 19. Juli 2003 12:10, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
Usually people ask for help here. In this case it's the other way
round: I may have some spare time during the next few weeks so if
anyone needs help writing a backend I may able to spend some time on
it.
Oh, what a lucky
Hi,
according to the info, I'll add the scanner to the device list...
What are the specs for this scanner (resolution, etc...)?
AFAIK this is a CCD device, is that correct?
Are there any volunteers to test this scanner?
Gerhard
On Samstag, 5. Juli 2003 13:26, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2003 13:57, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
With the patch the scanner now does what it is supposed to, i.e. it
scanes the area that I specify, but the resulting picture is just
garbage. In color mode there is a faint resemblance with the original
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2003 04:37, Cadu wrote:
Hi people!
Recently i've made my Genius ColorPage HR6X EPP works on Linux, with
Plustek module.
good to hear that!
It works fine! I hope I write an English-HOWTO in a few days. Now I have a
Portuguese-HOWTO . . . :)
If you want to, I
Hi Henning,
On Sonntag, 8. Juni 2003 17:01, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
Oh. Are you sure that this version supports your scanner? I can't find
Lide on the list of supported scanners for 1.0.9. 1.0.12 is the
current version of sane-backends but 1.0.10 may also work.
But I'm not an
Hi,
On Freitag, 21. März 2003 10:39, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
Please reply to the list, not to me personally. There are developers
that know much more about the plustek backend than me.
really ;-)
[SNIPSNAP]
sane-backends identified as 1.0.8
May be too old. But that's a
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 6. März 2003 07:49, Pierre Dumuid wrote:
Hi,
I've got a quick question... I've got a canon N 650U, scanner which is
working perfectly with sane.
good to hear ;-)
The problem is, each time I scan, it appears the scanner does a
calibration before each scan.
I know, this
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 6. März 2003 15:06, Danilo Godec wrote:
[SNIP]
I've made an interesting discovery - if I used the forceMode=1 and mov=2
parameters to pt_drv, the scanner was not recognized correctly (it was
recognized as 4380P when in fact it is a Primax 4800 Direct), but then
'scanimage
Hi,
what about the access rights of /dev/pt_drv0?
Please check this..
Gerhard
On Dienstag, 4. März 2003 13:36, Danilo Godec wrote:
I have a Primax 4800 Direct scanner, which is a re-labelled Plustek
parallel port scanner. I have Suse 8.1 which comes with sane 1.0.8 and
includes Plustek
Hi,
there's indeed a problem with the colors on the 1250 with the Plustek
backend ;-( - we're working on that...
Gerhard
On Sonntag, 2. März 2003 04:26, ionm...@indiainfo.com wrote:
Hello Henning,
In your previous message you said:-
Scanner - Epson Perfection 1250. Do you use the plustek
On Montag, 24. Februar 2003 18:53, m...@lnet.nl wrote:
I recently bought a Epson Perfection 1260 Photo.
But I don't have any clue how to install it under Linux.
Can someone please help me.
(I am using Red Hat Linux 8.0)
Thanks in advance.
Where's your problem?
Simply install at least
Hi,
use SANE-1.0.10 and then it should work!!!
The support is not included in versions 1.0.10...
Gerhard
On Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2003 12:02, vrap...@employees.org wrote:
I am having trouble getting my Canoscan N1220U scanner working
with a stock RH 8.0 install.
Here's the installed
Hi Till,
On Samstag, 1. Februar 2003 22:34, Till Kamppeter wrote:
Are these fixes in SANE 1.0.10 or have I to update the plustek backend
from your site (I make RPMs for SANE 1.0.10 for Mandrake currently).
fixed in 1.0.10!!
Please answer to the list and in addition to me (to overcome the
Hi Till,
I've checked this here with my OpticPro UT16 (it also has a TPA).
I'm not sure where this comes from. I assume a problem in xsane, as
the feature works correctly using xscanimage and quiteinsane.
On Sonntag, 2. Februar 2003 00:23, Till Kamppeter wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
I have set
Hi list,
after checking the unsupported.desc, I'm a little bit confused about the
Visioneer 4400. I got a report, that it has the following VID/PID:
vendor ID 0x0461, product ID 0x0347
This one is exactly the PrimaScan 2600u.
Steven Ellis reports this device as LM983x one
On Freitag, 31. Januar 2003 14:35, scott fagg wrote:
On 31 Jan 2003, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
I got an HP 2200C and it works fine with 1.0.9 but when i tried
,1.0.10pre2 but it works bad... it doesnt boot my scanner anyway .
I dont know why but , i just wanted to say ...Thanks for all
--Boundary-00=_WQUY2NBOWVO2FHDMEA7K
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi Michael,
On Friday, 17. January 2003 12:33, Michael Lestinsky wrote:
[SNIP]
I'm doing my first scans now. All images are to dark and have a very low
contrast.
Hi Beat,
can you send me the patch against plustek backend?
Have you managed so far to get any pictures?
Gerhard
On Tuesday, 14. January 2003 03:45, Beat Birkhofer wrote:
Hi
I replaced the fork() with a pthread (according the OS/2 example) and
now the plustek backend works (even with
Hi,
On Sunday, 12. January 2003 00:20, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
[SNIP]
Please check plustek.desc, the unsupported entries are broken, they
are all listed as Canon scanners. I guess you can just remove them
because they are in unsupported.desc now.
Okay fixed!
By the way, I'll remove
Hi Till,
On Saturday, 11. January 2003 19:12, Till Kamppeter wrote:
Thgank you for the update. I am preparing an official update for
Mandrake Linux 9.0 now, to preven the Epson 1260 Photo scanners of
Mandrake 9.0 users from being damaged.
I have tested your update with my Epson Perfection
Hi Gene,
On Saturday, 11. January 2003 22:08, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday 11 January 2003 10:05, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote:
Announcing a 45-1 release.
I unpacked it over the old 45 in sane-backends-1.0.9, did a make
clean make make install, which apparently went well.
Fireing up xsane
Hi,
On Sunday, 12. January 2003 15:43, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
[SNIP]
Hmpf! Depends on how you classify status? On one hand you're
right - the scanner is not supported perfectly, on the other hand,
the backend code is stable so far - so what?
For the backend status I think alpha is
Hi there,
I've currently updated the Plustek Backend.
New version now is 0.45-1.
All changes are now in CVS and will go into SANE-1.0.10.
This version is more or less a bug-fixing version and includes
support for the
EPSON 1260 Photo (inkl. TPA autodetection) - shouldn't damage motor anymore!
on, and move !
But, scanimage doesn't work !
--- Jaeger, Gerhard gerh...@gjaeger.de a écrit :
Hi,
this doesn't look too good, I think that the 660
does
not contain a LM983x chipset. Ain't it possible that
you open the scanner?
Or does anybody else know what chipset it uses?
Cheers
segmentation fault !!
I'll try with the latest release (Debian unstable
package)
--- Jaeger, Gerhard gerh...@gjaeger.de a écrit :
On Sunday, 5. January 2003 13:58, Karl Heinz Kremer
wrote:
It may work with the Plustek backend.
Or may not! I suggest to check for the chip inside
On Monday, 6. January 2003 20:37, Gene Heskett wrote:
[SNIP]
Post a notice here when it is please :-)
Okay!
I don't think this is quite Ready for prime time :-( We still
have that white vertical line artifact, and the segfault at the
end of the scan seems to be somewhat of a coin toss.
Hi Gene,
On Sunday, 5. January 2003 21:39, Gene Heskett wrote:
Hi all;
The artifact is still there, but I have a more pressing problem,
I've forgotten the location of the focus variable, at 600 dpi, I'm
seriously out of registration.
Humm, might have found it, the comment says sensor
Hi,
On Saturday, 4. January 2003 03:13, Adelson Santos de Oliveira wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to get the ASICs for Genius HR6 V2 CollorPage Parallel
Port. I didn't get it yet.
you might open the scanner and have a closer look athe the silicon
stuff inside - I know not a very good idea, but
On Sunday, 5. January 2003 13:58, Karl Heinz Kremer wrote:
It may work with the Plustek backend.
Or may not! I suggest to check for the chip inside!
There's a LM983x check on the download site for the
Plustek backend, called merlin testprogram:
Hi,
some additions:
/* Canon */
{ USB_DEVICE(0x04a9, 0x220E) }, /* CanoScan N1240U */
/* Umax */
{ USB_DEVICE(0x1606, 0x0060) }, /* Astra 3400U/3450U */
{ USB_DEVICE(0x1606, 0x0160) }, /* Astra 5400U */
/* HP */
{ USB_DEVICE(0x03f0, 0x505)
HELP!! - NOT AGAIN!!
Those d**n manufactures, by using similar names they make us believe
that same or similar hardware is inside those cheap scanners...
The HP2300C does not contain a LM983x chip, see my mail on this list
HP2300C chipset:
Sparrow Main Board V1.2 12-00080-01C with
Hi,
On Sunday, 15. December 2002 15:09, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
[SNIP]
Maybe we should add an unsupported.desc file that lists all the
scanners that are unsupported and point to websites containing
information about them. So we could add the entries from PROJECTS that
don't provide
Hi,
On Thursday, 12. December 2002 20:44, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
[SNIP]
The Genius ColorPage Vivid 3X works to some degree with the gt68xx
backend with some changes, and may be fully supported in future.
(http://www.meier-geinitz.de/sane/gt68xx-backend/)
But your scanner uses a
Thanks for that, I'll fix it!
Gerhard
On Friday, 6. December 2002 21:36, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hello !
I am forwarding the following bug reported via the Debian BTS:
| In backend/plustek-usbimg.c, line 1363:
|
[SNIPSNAP]
Hi,
this all looks okay, the problem is either your dll.conf
and/or the plustek.conf file...
At least you need the entry plustek in the dll.conf
and in the plustek.conf:
[usb] 0x004a9 0x2206
device auto
Check the examples in the file, that has been delivered with
the TEST3 tar-ball. Itmight
Hi Nick,
this effect is new although I think that somebody had reported
some problems with the binary mode...
I'll check this as soon as I got this device.
Gerhard
On Friday, 22. November 2002 14:08, Nick Lindsell wrote:
Greetings list,
I cannot scan properly in binary mode with an
Hi Henning,
thanks for this description, this sheds some light on my problems
with the CIS devices. Maybe I'm now able to tweak the exisiting
code that way, that it's usable with the Canon devices...
Shouldn't we try and create/provide a library function for this?
Gerhard
On Monday, 18.
Small summary:
- USB is up'n working
- Module scanner is loaded
-- Great!
Now you need the SANE Plustek backend working!
Which version do we have:
type:
scanimage --version
We should have at least 1.0.8 for the EPSON, if not,
try and find a suitable SANE-RPM from RedHat...
Next step:
Find
If this works well, there's no need to upgrade!
If you like to do so, check the download page
for installation instructions.
0.45-TEST2 includes a slight picture improvement that's all...
Gerhard
On Friday, 15. November 2002 22:14, Philippe Berini wrote:
Le Ven 15 Novembre 2002 20:54, Jaeger
So where's the problem so far?
You need an already installed and working usb subsystem
with the scanner module loaded.
You'll need at least SANE-1.0.9 installed and the plustek.conf
file set to your device...
TPA means TransParency Adaptor and is delivered with the
EPSON 1250 Photo.
That's all.
Hi there,
I currently received a mail about the HP2300C chipset:
Sparrow Main Board V1.2 12-00080-01C with two Chips:
26-00122-03A
0213E2FC1
and
EliteMT100MHz
M11B416256A -J25J
DZC1HC0310212
Sparrow CCD Board 12-00079-01A with
MM74HC04M
Any ideas which backend may support
Any comments on that?
Gerhard
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: I killed my Epson perfection 1260 photo. Twice.
Date: 22 Oct 2002 16:03:03 +0200
From: Hein-Jan Leliveld h.j.leliv...@student.tnw.tudelft.nl
To: plus...@linuxhacker.org
Hello,
Last week I've bought an epson 1260
Hi Franz,
yesterday I made an update of the plustek stuff and noticed,
that before this update the problem still existed. But now (currently
rechecked) the repository should contain the correct version...
Gerhard
everything.
Regards,
Aurelien
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote:
Hi,
can you please check the latest 0.44-8. The problem
should be solved so far!
Gerhard
diff -u -1 -b -p -u -r1.9 plustek-usbshading.c
--- plustek-usbshading.c2002/10/04 17:55:51 1.9
+++ plustek
Hi Petter,
what about cvs.hungry.com? Is it offline again?
I need to submit my latest patches befor SANE-1.0.9...
Please switch it online - thanks
Gerhard
Hi Till,
the problem of recompiling is known, the dependencies do not
work correctly for backend that use mulitple files. The workaround is:
touch backend/plustek.conf ; make all
I'd like to submitt the code, but the CVS server is currently down!
Can you please check 0.44-6 on the download
On Friday, 4. October 2002 21:09, you wrote:
[SNIP]
After updating to 0.44-2 and being in normal mode, only the scan head
light is on. When I switch from normal mode to transparency mode the
scan head light turns off and the TPA light on, as expected. Going back
to normal mode turns off the
On Saturday, 5. October 2002 19:42, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
[SNIP]
Please see the bottom of this message for the source of my confusion about
whether the N670U has an LM9833 or a LM9832. No, my memory has not been
playing tricks. But I am still confused.
[SNAP]
Let me first try and answer the
On Thursday, 3. October 2002 01:46, E V wrote:
[SNIP]
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of epson to 255.
[epson] sane_init: sane-backends 1.0.8
[epson] sane_init, usb /dev/usb/scanner0
[epson] sane_init, usb /dev/usb/scanner0
[epson] attach(usb /dev/usb/scanner0)
[epson] SANE Epson Backend
On Thursday, 3. October 2002 20:01, antoine wrote:
modprobe scanner vendor=0x04b8 product=0x011d
-
Hi,
How do you know these numbers : vendor=0x04b8 product=0x011d ?
Hi,
simply load the USB subsystem on linux and plug in the scanner.
Then dmesg will show something
On Monday, 30. September 2002 21:09, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Looks like the OS/2 gettext is more picky. Negative is already
defined in saneopts.de.po and .es.po. So you don't need to use it in
your po files as saneopts is included.
Okay, I see, I'll fix it for the plustek files.
Gerhard
Hi Frank,
thanks for the response, I might be able to figure out whats
happening now. The chip inside is reported as
GLUSB97 SC08-D047 or as
GENIUS 04-43-006B 9935
Maybe custom ASICs...
I only have some logs, where I'm able to identify some well known
byte sequences. I do not own such a
Hi Franz,
I just tried and checked out sane-backends and did:
./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --enable-translations
make all
And had no problems so far!
I'm willing to correct the plustek stuff, but I can't find the problem
here...
Gerhard
On Monday, 30. September 2002 01:12,
Hi,
this scanner is in fact a parallelport device which maps its port
via parallel-to-usb brigde to the USB bus...
As I do not have the protocol for the bridge, I do not plan to support
these devices... The same applies to the Plustek U12 (product ID 0x0001),
from the technical point of view the
Hi list,
I have a small problem, you guys out there might help:
The problem is ,that I have the Plustek parallel-port driver suitable
for a specific ASIC, so I know which registers need to be set to work.
Then I also have the USBsnoopy log of a device which contains this ASIC
too, but the
Hi there,
I've currently released V0.44 of the Plustek backend. I
have intergrated code to support CIS based devices, namely
CanoScan N670U and N650U.
The support is currently limited to color modes and without
any calibration. I used the information from the standalone
programs from Jason
I'll see if I'm able to aquire a Plustek 1248U, which in
fact uses the GT6801...
Gerhard
On Monday, 2. September 2002 00:07, Oliver Rauch wrote:
Jaeger, Gerhard schrieb:
On Saturday, 31. August 2002 16:17, Oliver Rauch wrote:
What about KYE/Genius (is a slash allowed?) ?
I've no idea if the slash is allowed. If so, let's change...
Gerhard
what will we do?
Henning said
Hi,
[SNIP]
Karl Heinz Kremer wrote:
So it's definitely not supported by the EPSON backend. I still
think that it's very likely a NS983x based scanner that could
be supported by the Plustek backend.
Does anybody know a good test that does not require to open
the cover and will detect
On Wednesday, 14. August 2002 11:29, Martyn Ranyard wrote:
Hi all,
I have a scanner attached to a server (HP 2200C attached to a Linux Dell
Server (Slackware 8.1), and the plustek backend seems to have some strange
issues (especially with sanetwain).
1. The Scanner takes approx 40s
On Wednesday, 14. August 2002 15:15, Martyn Ranyard wrote:
[SNIP]
Great, we're really getting there now. Is there a way of switching the
lamp on without doing a scan, so when the user launches their scanning
wizard the lamp can switch on, and then the preview goes ahead (not very
well, but
On Thursday, 1. August 2002 13:15, mh wrote:
Ryan Budge, Donnerstag, 1. August 2002 12:09:
There is a Linux program (not a backend) at
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/millwardjp/ . I didn't have a look at it
but as it uses libusb I guess porting to FreeBSED shouldn't be too
difficult.
The problem does not seem to disappear :-((
How can I access the repository? Any backups?
Cheers
Gerhard
On Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2002 10:56, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:09:00AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Oliver Schwartz]
On Tuesday 09 July 2002
Hi,
base for the Plustek UT24 support was the original NT-driver which
I had received from Plustek. But after porting it to Linux, it became
clear, that there's currently a problem in the transparency support.
This bug is currently not fixed, but scanning is possible. There's
a quality problem so
Nope!
AFAIK this device uses either a GrandTech chipset which is
not supported by the Plustek backend or the old parallel port ASIC 98003
with a parallel-USB bridge.
The first one is maybe supported by the GrandTech stuff which can be found
at:
http://www.mivlgu.murom.ru/~vsu/gt68xx/
Hope this
Hi,
this is in fact a known problem, it seems to hit other devices
like the HP2100/2200 too. We have to tweak the parameters in
th plustek_devs.c file for these devices, but I can't do this,
as I do not have one of these devices.
Gerhard
On Freitag, 21. Juni 2002 03:17, Carsten Neumann wrote:
Hi Mario.
find out what chipset is inside the HR6X, it's maybe supported
by the Plustek parallel port driver...
Gerhard
On Tuesday, 4. June 2002 04:23, Mario Alberto Cozzuol wrote:
Hi,
I am just new in the list and perhaps this question was already done, but I
did not find anything in the
Hi,
the problem is, that your scanner is not recognized by the driver. In that
case the beast is not loaded and you get these strange error messages.
Why is it not loaded?
No idea! You might enable the debug output of the kernel module and
send me the output to check the problem...
Gerhard
On
Try and enable the debug output of the Plustek Module pt_drv:
make clean
make DEBUG=y all
Then do the make install step and after the make load
step check the output of dmesg and send it to the list...
So we're might be able to pin down the problem
Gerhard
On Mittwoch, 29. Mai 2002 12:02,
Have you already checked this?
I think it's too late for 1.0.8! If not , Henning, can you do this change
before publishing 1.0.8?
Thanks
Gerhard
On Saturday, 25. May 2002 21:48, Ville Hallik wrote:
There is a big problem with HP 2200C (and possibly other USB scanners
supported by plustek
On Saturday, 18. May 2002 03:43, Fernando Hildebrand wrote:
I´ve compiled SANE 1.0.7, downloaded the Plustek
driver(I´ve got a OpticPro4831p paralel), compiled it
too, got the thing to work, only that, the light goes
only half way ( it only scans half of the scanner
frame)
When I use
Isn't the UMAX 3400 a LM983x based device?
Try the Plustek backend...
Gerhard
On Thursday, 16. May 2002 17:07, Carsten Neumann wrote:
Hi all,
is there any progress on the UMAX Astra 3400?
I've tried some changes of the umax1220u backend so the Astra 3400 should
be recognized but without
Hi,
there's no need to do a make install or something like
that. Simply configure the usb section of the Plustek backend.
The pt_drv stuff is a kernel module to support the older
Plustek parallel port devices. The USB-backend stuff is
already built-in
Gerhard
On Dienstag, 14. Mai 2002
Hi list,
the Plustek backend site has moved to:
www.gjaeger.de/scanner/plustek.html
If you maintain any links to the Plustek backend site,
please update them. The older URL will still exist for a while,
but will linb to the new one.
Gerhard
Wow another attempt to make LM983x based devices work ;-)
I'm a little bit confused about this, as I thought that
there are still three or four other similar backends:
HP2200C on sourceforge (also EPSON1250)
two attempts for CANON (CANON N650U and 670)
Plustek backend (for all Plustek LM9831/2,
Hi Franz,
AFAIR you had a problem with the Plustek backend
on OS/2, can you please send me the workaround
so I'm able to include that to our CVS here?
Thanks
Gerhard
Hi Franz,
is the function setitimer declared or even available?
If yes, what are the parameters...
On Linux the struct itimerval is defined as:
struct itimerval {
struct timeval it_interval;/* timer interval */
struct timeval it_value; /* current value */
};
Hi Mario,
some parts are from Plustek or whoever made the 98003 ASIC.
This ASIC is originally used in the OpticPro P12 and PT12,
which are parallel-port devices. I think the Genius Chip
inside is the USB-to-Parallel converter.
I assume, that if the protocol over the USB is known, the
parallelport
Hi,
the calibration for non Plustek devices is currently far from beeing
perfect. The plan is to integrate the calibration from the National
Semiconductor Sources to have at least better results.
You may want to do this, feel free to contribute...
Gerhard
On Wednesday, 6. March 2002 21:39, Uwe
Hi Uwe, hi lists,
I've currently put the test-version 0.41-102 onto the Plustek
driver downloadpage at
http://home.t-online.de/home/g-jaeger/plustek.html
You will find the files at the download section in the test area.
They're called plustek-sane-0.41-101.tgz.
The files are patches against
Hi Uwe,
the Plustek-backend supports the EPSON, that's the code
Gene Heskett (my major tester ;-) mentioned.
The stuff is already include in SANE-1.0.7 but not completely...
The patch Gene mentioned 0.41-99 is currently not available,
but if you like to I can send it to you...
I plan to update
Hi there,
while playing around with two scanner using the Plustek backend,
if found, that xsane hangs in sane_exit...
Here' s what I'm doin':
Starting xsane (version 0.84), the device selection box came up and I cancel
it - result: xsane hangs.
The same for xscanimage works!
It works fine while
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
