[sane-devel] MacOS client

2002-04-19 Thread Mick Barry
us (Yes, Kylix is not >Free either). You don't have the skills but you'll only use a product with the source code freely available :-) Seriously though, I understand and respect your principles. Just hope you don't expect all developers to make all their work freely available.

[sane-devel] MacOS client

2002-04-19 Thread Mick Barry
>download" but no source code, or freedom to redistribute/modify. e.g. GNU GPL > >Martyn > >At 06:10 AM 4/19/02 +1000, Mick Barry wrote: >>What do you mean by "Free in both senses"? >> >>At 04:15 PM 18/04/2002 +0100, Martyn Ranyard wrote: >

[sane-devel] MacOS client

2002-04-19 Thread Mick Barry
What do you mean by "Free in both senses"? At 04:15 PM 18/04/2002 +0100, Martyn Ranyard wrote: >I know there's scanlite, but that doesn't seem to be Free in both senses, >so is there a Java/MacOS Free sane client? > > >Martyn Ranyard >Free Software Advocate > >icq - 122500800 >irc - Joran on OPN

[sane-devel] xsane issues on Mac OS X

2002-04-12 Thread Mick Barry
josi scan lite should, though I've never tested it. http://www.objects.com.au/products/josi/scanlite At 09:43 PM 11/04/2002 +0100, Jim George wrote: >Paul, > > I'm not aware of any Mac OS X client that can 'talk' to a sane backend >on a Linux backend. > > My scanner is a Mustek 1200CP+ fl

[sane-devel] xsane - a suggestion

2001-09-20 Thread Mick Barry
You could have a look at josi scan lite, as itt displays a preview of your scan. It requires Java to run and is still in it's infancy but check it out if you're interested. More info at http://www.objects.com.au/products/josi. mick Christoph Kukulies wrote: > What I'm wondering about is why xs