't install or upgrade anything else because apt
thinks iscan is broken, and keeps insisting on trying to remove
it when it performs any other action.
any ideas on how to work around this?
paul
=-
paul fox, pgf at foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 29.8 degrees)
at least
> one package in the Ubuntu universe (multiverse?) that suffers from
> the same problem.
sigh. thanks for the explanation, even if it wasn't the one i wanted. :-)
paul
=-
paul fox, pgf at foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 22.3 degrees)
e. The same
> would be true for any other backends that you looked at or borrowed
> from.
"looked at"? i don't believe that's true. that implies there's
some sort of unpublished trade secret in play. copyright applies
to expression, not concept.
paul
=-
paul fox, pgf at foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 25.3 degrees)
s made using sane vs. using windows software from epson?
bear in mind that i'm not a practiced gimp user at all, so if the
linux vs. windows results will be comparable, but easier for a
scanning neophyte to attain under windows, i may go that route in
any case...
thanks,
paul
