[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-12-27 Thread stef
Hello, I have committed a slightly modifed version of your patch in git repository. I have checked with a GL841 CIS scanner that they are still working. I'll rely on you to test that the Opticbook 3600 is working like expected. I have left calibration cache disabled like you

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-12-17 Thread Chris Berry
Hey stef, I see things seem to be progressing well with the lide 110, good times! I have recently had a problem with the account I set up the mailing list with so I have added this account instead. I doubt there will have been any progress on the plustek drivers, but as I've missed some of the

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-12-06 Thread Chris Berry
Chris, please go ahead. I think you could remove some of my Chris why comments where you know. Should the scanner be added also to the genesys.conf Definitely here and libsane.rules files? I have never entered in this file, what was the reason behind adding to it? Or at least what does it

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-12-06 Thread m. allan noah
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Chris Berry s0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk wrote: Chris, please go ahead. I think you could remove some of my Chris why comments where you know. Should the scanner be added also to the genesys.conf Definitely here and libsane.rules files? I have never entered in

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-12-06 Thread stef
Le Monday 06 December 2010 15:54:44 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Chris, please go ahead. I think you could remove some of my Chris why comments where you know. Should the scanner be added also to the genesys.conf Definitely here and libsane.rules files? I have never entered in

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-12-06 Thread Chris Berry
Thanks Stef, a week is no problem for me, i'm pretty busy at work at the minute so a weeks time might work out best for all of us. Chris On 06/12/10 19:53, stef wrote: Le Monday 06 December 2010 15:54:44 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Chris, please go ahead. I think you could remove some

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-12-06 Thread Chris Berry
Cheers Allan, Stef said hes gonna give the code a thorough look through in a week or so, should be plenty of time for the next release if it is around your proposed time. Thanks Chris On 06/12/10 15:08, m. allan noah wrote: On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Chris Berrys0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-11-28 Thread stef
Le Thursday 25 November 2010 19:57:19 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hey all, Sorry for my absence any of those who were waiting on the support for this scanner, I had a massive internet problem then started a new job so things got held back. A quick update to the project: I managed to get

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-11-26 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Thu, 2010-11-25 18:57:19 +, Chris Berry s0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk wrote: One big part of why I didnt merge straight off the original was that I was using an IDE to code and it went and screwed all the whitespace up, so now I have a diff on every line :(. If anyone has any suggestions

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-03-30 Thread Chris Berry
Hi Stef, I take it that you have now received my preliminary copy of my report. I will send you a completed copy when I am done. I have a question about the image scans at 1200+ dpi. When attempting scans at these resolutions I only get half an image. A little investigation has led me to find

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-03-30 Thread stef
Le mardi 30 mars 2010 09:53:20 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hi Stef, I take it that you have now received my preliminary copy of my report. I will send you a completed copy when I am done. I have a question about the image scans at 1200+ dpi. When attempting scans at these resolutions I

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-03-23 Thread stef
Le lundi 22 mars 2010 22:14:11 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : stef wrote: Le lundi 22 mars 2010 07:26:23 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hi guys, I have included a patch for the plustek 3600. It isnt quite there yet but at least you can apply it to the current development version and

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-03-22 Thread Chris Berry
stef wrote: Le lundi 22 mars 2010 07:26:23 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hi guys, I have included a patch for the plustek 3600. It isnt quite there yet but at least you can apply it to the current development version and should be able to test (for those of you with the scanner) to see

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-03-21 Thread Chris Berry
stef wrote: Hello, for the image quality, I think you could concentrate on on full sensor resolution and 'half ccd' resolution. I'm not sure what you mean but I guess full resolution is the maximum hardware resolution of the scanner? If so then what is 'half ccd' resolution?

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-03-20 Thread stef
Le jeudi 18 mars 2010 22:14:26 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hello, in order to properly review the result of your hard work, we need the changes you done as patches. Either against the version you started to modify, or as a git patchset against latest version, which is the best

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-03-18 Thread Chris Berry
Hello, in order to properly review the result of your hard work, we need the changes you done as patches. Either against the version you started to modify, or as a git patchset against latest version, which is the best solution. On your site, I only found the full sources, may

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-03-16 Thread Chris Berry
On 03/09/2010 05:15 AM, stef wrote: Le lundi 8 mars 2010 17:20:23 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Ok Stef I have a bit more time to concentrate on this at the minute. I have updated the white_shading.pnm and included it at http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update080310 there is

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-03-09 Thread stef
Le lundi 8 mars 2010 17:20:23 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Ok Stef I have a bit more time to concentrate on this at the minute. I have updated the white_shading.pnm and included it at http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update080310 there is also a copy of the latest scan there

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-03-05 Thread stef
Le jeudi 4 mars 2010 17:13:12 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : On 03/03/2010 06:03 AM, stef wrote: ... Ok thanks guys, this seems to have done the trick! There is now a black line down one side of the page (not sure if that is supposed to be there or not) and the colours seem to be a bit grainy.

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-03-04 Thread Chris Berry
On 03/03/2010 06:03 AM, stef wrote: Le mardi 2 mars 2010 16:40:21 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hey guys, I resolved the issue I was having with the dark_shading calibration. The lamp was turning off fine but the | REG03_LAMPPWR in gl842_begin_scan was turning the light back on for the

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-03-03 Thread stef
Le mardi 2 mars 2010 16:40:21 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hey guys, I resolved the issue I was having with the dark_shading calibration. The lamp was turning off fine but the | REG03_LAMPPWR in gl842_begin_scan was turning the light back on for the scan :/ . Having resolved this there is

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-03-03 Thread Pierre Willenbrock
stef schrieb: Le mardi 2 mars 2010 16:40:21 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hey guys, I resolved the issue I was having with the dark_shading calibration. The lamp was turning off fine but the | REG03_LAMPPWR in gl842_begin_scan was turning the light back on for the scan :/ . Having resolved

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-03-02 Thread Chris Berry
Hey guys, I resolved the issue I was having with the dark_shading calibration. The lamp was turning off fine but the | REG03_LAMPPWR in gl842_begin_scan was turning the light back on for the scan :/ . Having resolved this there is still a black line down the center of the page. The

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-24 Thread Chris Berry
Hey Stef, I think I have sorted out the white shading data but the black is still a mystery. I have uploaded some files to the project site (here http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update240210 ) these are at shading lines set to 400 but for the scan to work even a little bit I

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-24 Thread stef
Le mercredi 24 f?vrier 2010 03:00:16 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hey Stef, I think I have sorted out the white shading data but the black is still a mystery. I have uploaded some files to the project site (here http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update240210 ) these are at

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-24 Thread Pierre Willenbrock
stef schrieb: Le mercredi 24 f?vrier 2010 03:00:16 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hey Stef, I think I have sorted out the white shading data but the black is still a mystery. I have uploaded some files to the project site (here http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update240210 )

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-24 Thread Chris Berry
On 02/24/2010 10:33 AM, Pierre Willenbrock wrote: stef schrieb: Le mercredi 24 f?vrier 2010 03:00:16 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hey Stef, I think I have sorted out the white shading data but the black is still a mystery. I have uploaded some files to the project site (here

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-24 Thread Pierre Willenbrock
Chris Berry schrieb: On 02/24/2010 10:33 AM, Pierre Willenbrock wrote: stef schrieb: Le mercredi 24 f?vrier 2010 03:00:16 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hey Stef, I think I have sorted out the white shading data but the black is still a mystery. I have uploaded some files to the

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-23 Thread stef
Le lundi 22 f?vrier 2010 15:09:11, vous avez ?crit : On 02/22/2010 06:43 AM, stef wrote: Le lundi 22 f?vrier 2010 02:09:14 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : ... Hey Stef, Thanks for the awk script, helped a lot. I put the values into a spreadsheet and got gamma values all around 1.0 so I

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-23 Thread Chris Berry
stef wrote: Le lundi 22 f?vrier 2010 15:09:11, vous avez ?crit : On 02/22/2010 06:43 AM, stef wrote: Le lundi 22 f?vrier 2010 02:09:14 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : ... Hey Stef, Thanks for the awk script, helped a lot. I put the values into a spreadsheet and got

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-23 Thread stef
Le mardi 23 f?vrier 2010 14:48:40 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : stef wrote: Hello, The shading calibration area is 'under the roof', it is located inside the scanner. You can have a picture of it by doing a scan after setting physical y offset to 0. ie you scan from parking

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-22 Thread Chris Berry
Hey Stef, I think I have isolated the gamma tables from the logs but there is a significant difference; the gamma tables all seem to be sent at once to the scanner. Regs 0x5b and 0x5c are both set to 0x00 and 1536 bytes are sent to the scanner. I have attached the log file appearances of the

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-22 Thread stef
Le lundi 22 f?vrier 2010 02:09:14 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hey Stef, I think I have isolated the gamma tables from the logs but there is a significant difference; the gamma tables all seem to be sent at once to the scanner. Regs 0x5b and 0x5c are both set to 0x00 and 1536 bytes are

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-22 Thread Chris Berry
On 02/22/2010 06:43 AM, stef wrote: Le lundi 22 f?vrier 2010 02:09:14 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hey Stef, I think I have isolated the gamma tables from the logs but there is a significant difference; the gamma tables all seem to be sent at once to the scanner. Regs 0x5b and 0x5c

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-21 Thread stef
Le samedi 20 f?vrier 2010 16:14:02, vous avez ?crit : Hello, regarding the gamma values you can extract the gamma tables sent to your scanner by the windows driver from USB logs. Put them in a spreadsheet, then you can insert the formula used by the genesys backend and compare

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-20 Thread Chris Berry
On 02/12/2010 08:47 AM, stef wrote: Le jeudi 11 f?vrier 2010 19:50:25, vous avez ?crit : Hello, I am facing the same issues than you while adding support for the HP3670. I eventually found that one of my decoding script was buggy and hide most of AFE accesses. I have appended

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-20 Thread stef
Le samedi 20 f?vrier 2010 05:06:40, vous avez ?crit : On 02/12/2010 08:47 AM, stef wrote: ... Hey Stef, Sorry I haven't been in touch in a while I have been busy. Ok i've looked at this and my understanding is that I have to do two things; sort the gain values out and the shading

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-20 Thread Chris Berry
Hello, regarding the gamma values you can extract the gamma tables sent to your scanner by the windows driver from USB logs. Put them in a spreadsheet, then you can insert the formula used by the genesys backend and compare the reference and generated curves. I am not sure

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-12 Thread stef
Le jeudi 11 f?vrier 2010 19:50:25, vous avez ?crit : Hello, I am facing the same issues than you while adding support for the HP3670. I eventually found that one of my decoding script was buggy and hide most of AFE accesses. I have appended the fixed version. By decoding

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-11 Thread Chris Berry
Hello, I am facing the same issues than you while adding support for the HP3670. I eventually found that one of my decoding script was buggy and hide most of AFE accesses. I have appended the fixed version. By decoding usbsnoop again, you may find more AFE writes to be coded

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-10 Thread stef
Le mardi 9 f?vrier 2010 18:05:15 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Ok so ive managed to fix the problem with the FLAG being set, the REG01_DVDSET part was screwing me up, so im not sure what that was about... More details are here http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update090210 with a

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-09 Thread Chris Berry
Ok so ive managed to fix the problem with the FLAG being set, the REG01_DVDSET part was screwing me up, so im not sure what that was about... More details are here http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update090210 with a new attachment of the scanning image. The scans now have a red

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-09 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Tue, 2010-02-09 17:05:15 +, Chris Berry s0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk wrote: Ok so ive managed to fix the problem with the FLAG being set, the REG01_DVDSET part was screwing me up, so im not sure what that was about... More details are here

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-09 Thread Chris Berry
Yea thanks guys for all the support so far, if you are interested there are scans available on the project website. As soon as the brightness/red colour is sorted i should (hopefully) be in a position to release to the development. From reading the lists I think we are probably going to be

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-09 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Tue, 2010-02-09 18:19:51 +, Chris Berry s0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk wrote: On 02/09/2010 05:24 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: On Tue, 2010-02-09 17:05:15 +, Chris Berrys0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk wrote: Ok so ive managed to fix the problem with the FLAG being set, the REG01_DVDSET

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-07 Thread Chris Berry
Hey Stef, did you manage to have a look at the patch I sent you? I havent had much time to look at the project over the last few days so not much has happened, i'm still getting black scans from the scanner when I remove the NO_CALIBRATION flag. Have you any idea which function will be causing

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-03 Thread Chris Berry
On 02/02/2010 05:29 AM, stef wrote: Le lundi 1 f?vrier 2010 13:52:30 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : On 01/31/2010 09:21 PM, stef wrote: Le dimanche 31 janvier 2010 20:30:58 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Ok Stef, ignore that last email, I just got a scan! its far from

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-03 Thread stef
Le mercredi 3 f?vrier 2010 01:48:11, vous avez ?crit : On 02/02/2010 05:29 AM, stef wrote: ... Stef Cheers for the advice again stef, I just added the half ccd flag and it sorted out the image as it should look. The only issue now is that the scan seems a little dark, again ill upload

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-02 Thread stef
Le lundi 1 f?vrier 2010 13:52:30 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : On 01/31/2010 09:21 PM, stef wrote: Le dimanche 31 janvier 2010 20:30:58 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Ok Stef, ignore that last email, I just got a scan! its far from perfect but im on the right road at least (mostly your

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-02-01 Thread Chris Berry
On 01/31/2010 09:21 PM, stef wrote: Le dimanche 31 janvier 2010 20:30:58 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Ok Stef, ignore that last email, I just got a scan! its far from perfect but im on the right road at least (mostly your advice ;) ). One of my GPIO wasnt set correctly and you were

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-31 Thread stef
Le samedi 30 janvier 2010 15:29:50 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : On 01/30/2010 01:40 PM, stef wrote: Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 11:26:56 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : No stef im almost certain this isnt a Wolfson, from an old project page I think it is an Analog Digital 9826 Link:

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-31 Thread Chris Berry
On 01/31/2010 01:11 PM, stef wrote: Le samedi 30 janvier 2010 15:29:50 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hello, the function you wrote is fine. What I wanted to share is that it is easier to do experiments from within a really simple test program than the full blown scanimage

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-31 Thread Chris Berry
Ok Stef, ignore that last email, I just got a scan! its far from perfect but im on the right road at least (mostly your advice ;) ). One of my GPIO wasnt set correctly and you were right about the bit 8 being set on the control reg of the AFE. An upload of the image is at

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-31 Thread stef
Le dimanche 31 janvier 2010 20:30:58 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Ok Stef, ignore that last email, I just got a scan! its far from perfect but im on the right road at least (mostly your advice ;) ). One of my GPIO wasnt set correctly and you were right about the bit 8 being set on the

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-30 Thread stef
Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 11:26:56 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : No stef im almost certain this isnt a Wolfson, from an old project page I think it is an Analog Digital 9826 Link: http://www.analog.com/en/audiovideo-products/cameracamcorder-analog-front-e nds/ad9826/products/product.html

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-30 Thread Chris Berry
On 01/30/2010 01:40 PM, stef wrote: Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 11:26:56 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : No stef im almost certain this isnt a Wolfson, from an old project page I think it is an Analog Digital 9826 Link:

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-28 Thread Chris Berry
Hey stef, i'm really struggling to work out what all these frontend writes are for. Below is a grep of the frontends from a scan, I have done several scans and they all roughly follow this format. I'm not sure why the offset (regs 05 - 07) have values 0x80 and 0xff and the values for both

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-28 Thread stef
Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 02:15:01 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hey stef, i'm really struggling to work out what all these frontend writes are for. Below is a grep of the frontends from a scan, I have done several scans and they all roughly follow this format. I'm not sure why the offset

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-28 Thread Chris Berry
No stef im almost certain this isnt a Wolfson, from an old project page I think it is an Analog Digital 9826 Link: http://www.analog.com/en/audiovideo-products/cameracamcorder-analog-front-ends/ad9826/products/product.html I too am puzzled why there are so many writes to the frontend, the

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-24 Thread Chris Berry
stef wrote: Le vendredi 22 janvier 2010 17:57:06 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hey Stef, I had to take a little time off the front end stuff to do some documentation but Im looking at it again now. Like you im fairly certain everything else is set, could you share with me a snoop of the

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-24 Thread Jack McGill
--- On Sun, 1/24/10, Chris Berry s0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk wrote: From: Chris Berry s0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600 To: stef stef.dev at free.fr, sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Date: Sunday, January 24, 2010, 6:01 AM stef wrote

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-24 Thread stef
Le dimanche 24 janvier 2010 16:32:44, vous avez ?crit : --- On Sun, 1/24/10, Chris Berry s0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk wrote: From: Chris Berry s0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600 To: stef stef.dev at free.fr, sane-devel

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-23 Thread stef
Le vendredi 22 janvier 2010 17:57:06 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hey Stef, I had to take a little time off the front end stuff to do some documentation but Im looking at it again now. Like you im fairly certain everything else is set, could you share with me a snoop of the HP3670? I'm

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-16 Thread stef
Le vendredi 15 janvier 2010 14:19:15 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hi Stef, in the course of trying to get the lamp working I was playing with the settings and after I removed my changes the lamp functions as i expected too so that issue is resolved. If my understanding is correct the code

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-15 Thread stef
Le jeudi 14 janvier 2010 17:47:41 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Ok quick update, I have managed to get the lamp on during scans! The reason it was failing is because reg[0x01] was hard coded to CIS type and this is a CCD scanner. Hopefully this means that all I have to do is polish up the

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-15 Thread Chris Berry
Hi Stef, in the course of trying to get the lamp working I was playing with the settings and after I removed my changes the lamp functions as i expected too so that issue is resolved. If my understanding is correct the code should select whether to set cis or not based on the variable in

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-14 Thread Chris Berry
Ok I have set the values for the 0x6b and im still getting a completely black scan but the lamp is being turned off at the start of a scan. When the scanner is plugged in the light is ON and when i start a scan the light is immediately turned off. The init reg is definitely sending the correct

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-14 Thread Chris Berry
Ok quick update, I have managed to get the lamp on during scans! The reason it was failing is because reg[0x01] was hard coded to CIS type and this is a CCD scanner. Hopefully this means that all I have to do is polish up the remaining register values at init time. Currently the light is on

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-08 Thread Chris Berry
Thanks for the quick reply stef, hope you had a good christmas/new year :). I have made changes to the GPIO settings as appropriate (i.e. matched the settings to what I believe is correct from register writes) but I could only find values for 0x6b, 0x6d, 0x6e and 0x6f. I couldn't find a write

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-08 Thread stef
Le vendredi 8 janvier 2010 04:38:07 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Thanks for the quick reply stef, hope you had a good christmas/new year :). I have made changes to the GPIO settings as appropriate (i.e. matched the settings to what I believe is correct from register writes) but I could

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-07 Thread Chris Berry
Hi Stef, I have updates on this project at http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update070110 with some attachments. I am still struggling to work out why the scan lamp is off during scanning. My thoughts are that maybe the genesys backend is saying the lamp sleep mode if on before

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-07 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Thu, 2010-01-07 14:14:20 +, Chris Berry s0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk wrote: I have updates on this project at http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update070110 with some attachments. I am still struggling to work out why the scan lamp is off during scanning. My thoughts are

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-07 Thread Chris Berry
lol no worries Jan, hopefully I can get the scanner working soon for you :) Chris On 01/07/2010 04:25 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: On Thu, 2010-01-07 14:14:20 +, Chris Berrys0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk wrote: I have updates on this project at

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-07 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Thu, 2010-01-07 17:34:53 +, Chris Berry s0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk wrote: On 01/07/2010 04:25 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: It's at least great to see someone working on a backend for the '3600. That will be a nice scanner once it's somewhat supported. So I'm having some hope that, at

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2010-01-07 Thread stef
Le jeudi 7 janvier 2010 15:14:20 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Hi Stef, I have updates on this project at http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update070110 with some attachments. I am still struggling to work out why the scan lamp is off during scanning. My thoughts are that

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-30 Thread Chris Berry
Ok thanks stef, i've been experimenting a little with the logs, there was a small error/issue with the parse1.awk script you sent me. I don't know if you have encountered this but around line 113 there is an if statement along the lines of: if ($5 == 0x002]) this fails because of what I

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-29 Thread stef
Le jeudi 24 d?cembre 2009 06:07:23 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Just a quick update, I had to take a little time off from the project but I should be able to work on it more now. I have an update at http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update with new log files for smaller scan and

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-24 Thread Chris Berry
Just a quick update, I had to take a little time off from the project but I should be able to work on it more now. I have an update at http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update with new log files for smaller scan and preview snoops. Stef is there any chance you could explain the

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-09 Thread Chris Berry
Hey Stef, the script you forwarded to me (decode-pl.sh) seems to be reliant on some .awk files (filtre.awk, swap.awk and refait.awk). I had a quick look online but could not find them, is there any chance you could send them to me :) Chris On 12/07/2009 08:24 PM, stef wrote: Le lundi 7

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-09 Thread stef
Le mercredi 9 d?cembre 2009 02:48:52, vous avez ?crit : Hey Stef, the script you forwarded to me (decode-pl.sh) seems to be reliant on some .awk files (filtre.awk, swap.awk and refait.awk). I had a quick look online but could not find them, is there any chance you could send them to me :)

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-09 Thread Jack McGill
] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600 To: stef stef.dev at free.fr Cc: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 6:20 PM Hi guys, i'm a little bit stuck with what to do next. I have set up as suggested in previous mails and now I have an image coming

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-09 Thread Jack McGill
: [sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600 To: stef stef.dev at free.fr Cc: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 6:20 PM Hi guys, i'm a little bit stuck with what to do next. I have set up as suggested in previous mails and now I have an image

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-07 Thread Chris Berry
Ok I have managed to use SniffUSB to extract some data during the calibration and preview stages, there is too much to post here but im not sure how to interpret it. I have tried usb-robot but am struggling to get it working (it tells me there is a problem finding libusb header which is

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-07 Thread Jack McGill
: Re: [sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600 To: stef stef.dev at free.fr Cc: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Date: Monday, December 7, 2009, 11:30 AM Ok I have managed to use SniffUSB to extract some data during the calibration and preview stages, there is too much to post here

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-07 Thread stef
Le lundi 7 d?cembre 2009 19:30:15 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Ok I have managed to use SniffUSB to extract some data during the calibration and preview stages, there is too much to post here but im not sure how to interpret it. I have tried usb-robot but am struggling to get it working (it

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-06 Thread Chris Berry
Thanks for the info Stef, I have run sane-find-scanner on the scanner and it confirms that the chipset is indeed GL482. I was under the impression the Genesys backend was for GL481, does it support GL482 as well? Thanks Chris -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-06 Thread stef
Le dimanche 6 d?cembre 2009 20:18:17 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit : Thanks for the info Stef, I have run sane-find-scanner on the scanner and it confirms that the chipset is indeed GL482. I was under the impression the Genesys backend was for GL481, does it support GL482 as well? Thanks

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-05 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Fri, 2009-12-04 11:54:02 +, Chris Berry s0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk wrote: As part of a project I am currently undertaking I am creating support for the opticbook 3600 under linux. It seems the best approach to this is to create a SANE backend for the scanner. After reading the

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-05 Thread Janusz S. Bień
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 Chris Berry s0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk wrote: Hello, As part of a project I am currently undertaking I am creating support for the opticbook 3600 under linux. [...] I am assuming there are no other people working on this project so far (if so please let me know!)

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-05 Thread stef
Le samedi 5 d?cembre 2009 15:58:42 Janusz S. Bie?, vous avez ?crit : On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 Chris Berry s0457957 at sms.ed.ac.uk wrote: Hello, As part of a project I am currently undertaking I am creating support for the opticbook 3600 under linux. [...] I am assuming there are no

[sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600

2009-12-04 Thread Chris Berry
Hello, As part of a project I am currently undertaking I am creating support for the opticbook 3600 under linux. It seems the best approach to this is to create a SANE backend for the scanner. After reading the available documentation I am of the understanding that I should post to this