Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
Hi,
>> Also note that the 640u still doesn't work with epson2 after the fixes
>> that have been done so far; it's still NAKing some command (there's a
>> log in the Debian bug report if anybody wants to look into it).
>
> It's sending an unsupported ESC m. That has been f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010-12-20 20:15, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> [...]
>
> Also note that the 640u still doesn't work with epson2 after the fixes
> that have been done so far; it's still NAKing some command (there's a
> log in the Debian bug report if anybody wants to loo
Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
Hi,
> I checked with Epson and confirmed that the error code can safely be
> masked with 0xc0 for the Perfection 1650. This should be done before
> checking any of the bit flags of course.
> Also note that this is a model specific fix and should not be applied in
> genera
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010?12?07? 08:50, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> On 2010?12?06? 09:44, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>> [...] The backend does not
>> do the right thing protocol-wise and I suggested a fix in a previous
>> comment. Once that fix is added, you will still be ou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010?12?06? 09:44, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> [...] The backend does not
> do the right thing protocol-wise and I suggested a fix in a previous
> comment. Once that fix is added, you will still be out of luck because
> your scans will be aborted by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010-12-05 06:38, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> On Thursday, December 02, 2010 05:37:36 pm Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>> On 2010-12-02 20:17, Julien BLACHE wrote:
>> For some reason the device is saying that it received a cancel request
>> (did someone push a
On Thursday, December 02, 2010 05:37:36 pm Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> On 2010-12-02 20:17, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> For some reason the device is saying that it received a cancel request
> (did someone push a cancel button on the device?). Protocol-wise, the
> backend is supposed to send a CAN in that