Hi,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 05:41:49PM +0100, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> Those corrupted horizontal lines are the result of a buffer overrun. I
> thought i did setup the "words per line" parameter correctly, but
> obviously i did not. In this case "word" seems to mean 1 byte while in
> other cont
Henning Meier-Geinitz schrieb:
>
> I only get backtracking here with high load of the computer. However
> I can confirm the horizontal lines. Looks like something connected to
> backtracking at 16 bit doesn't fully work yet. I don't have
> these lines in 8 bit mode.
>
Those corrupted horizontal
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 12:00:30AM +0100, Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski wrote:
> sorry, I did not realize that there is a difference between current CVS
> and experimental.
Are you really sure that you use experimental now? :-)
Some of your errors occur for me with the normal CVS, but not wi
Hi again,
sorry, I did not realize that there is a difference between current CVS
and experimental.
These are my results with the current experimental code:
Lineart:
75: ok
150: ok
300: ok
600: ok
1200: ok
2400: ok
gray/8bit:
75: ok
150: ok
300: ok
600: ok
1200: ok
2400: Error during read: er
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 02:19:36PM +0100, Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski wrote:
> I did some tests with the LiDE 60 and the current CVS backend
> (20051204-14:10). These are my results:
Use the backend from experimental CVS. As mentioned in my success
report, that one works much better, at le
Hi everyone,
I did some tests with the LiDE 60 and the current CVS backend
(20051204-14:10). These are my results:
Lineart:
75: ok
150: ok
300: ok
600: ok
1200: ok
2400: freeze after 6 cm
Gray/8 bit
75: ok
150: ok
300: ok
600: ok
1200: freeze after 4 cm
2400: freeze after 1.5 cm
Gray/16 bit
7
