Sir,
I have purchased HP scanjet 7500 and could not find a driver for linux.
Please advice me where I get a linux driver for this model scaner.
regards
madhu
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Olaf Meeuwissen
wrote:
> Peter Thompson writes:
>
> > I am trying to get my Epson 3490 to work on 12.04
Peter Thompson writes:
> I am trying to get my Epson 3490 to work on 12.04 Ubuntu running on my AMD 64
> machine.
>
> Could you pleases point me to a page with an explanation of how to instal
> backends.
>
> I have tried with;
>
> libsane-extras_1.0.18.12ubuntu1_amd64
>
> and get this error
>
>
I am trying to get my Epson 3490 to work on 12.04 Ubuntu running on my AMD
64 machine.
Could you pleases point me to a page with an explanation of how to instal
backends.
I have tried with;
libsane-extras_1.0.18.12ubuntu1_amd64
and get this error
Error: Dependency is not satisfiable: libltdl3
Hi,
On 07.12.2007, at 15:26, Patrick wrote:
> I have an Epson 3490. It did work in Ubuntu Edgy but not too well.
> If I
> used it in Windoze and then Ubuntu it worked fine. However if it
> was not
> re-initialized under windoze every so often it would not work.
> ...
> but I get this message w
Hi Everyone
I have an Epson 3490. It did work in Ubuntu Edgy but not too well. If I
used it in Windoze and then Ubuntu it worked fine. However if it was not
re-initialized under windoze every so often it would not work.
Now I have upgraded to Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon.
From what I have read on the
Hello,
I am busy trying to get a brandnew Epson Perfection 3490 PHOTO at work under
SANE.
I am running on Debian unstable, scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.18; backend
version 1.0.18.
One of the problems with this scanner are the many contradictory messages,
which sometimes
say that it is possi
Hi,
> Epson 3490 is inexpensive scaner and is listed on the sane page as
> beeing supported (as "good").
> The question is.. does sane supporr olso slide/negative scaning,
> and how good this scaner behaves under Linux...
> Does anybody on the list had any experience with this scaner and
> transpa
Radek Rurarz writes:
> Epson 3490 is inexpensive scaner and is listed on the sane page as
> beeing supported (as "good").
> The question is.. does sane supporr olso slide/negative scaning,
It does.
> and
> how good this scaner behaves under Linux...
> Does anybody on the list had any experience
Hello,
I'm looking for a scaner (rather inexpensive one) that could scan
slides and negatives (mainly B&W) under linux.
Curently I have a Microtec 35t+ which is a dedicated film scaner, which
works quite nice with vuescan but has problems (at least with Advansys
SCSI controler and 2.4 kernels, will
Gary Montalbine wrote:
> I recently exchanged my Epson 3170 for and Epson 3490 because I was
> unhappy with Iscan. I may have made a mistake. I am using Mandriva
> 2006CE, sane-backends 1.0.17 and xsane 0.991. I am using the default
> settings.
>
> When I try to make a copy to printer, the prev
Hi,
> also with mac and official cd found in the box the scanner would go
> nut and block itself. i am clueless
> [snapscan] sense_handler: sense key: 0x04, asc: 0x00, ascq: 0x00,
> i1: 0x00, i2: 0x04 [snapscan] sense_handler: Hardware error. (0x00,
> 0x04)
> [snapscan] test_unit_ready: snapscan_
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:15:43PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> blicero writes:
>
> > [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of snapscan to 2.
> > [snapscan] test_unit_ready: snapscan_cmd command failed: Device
> > busy
> > [snapscan] Scanner warming up - waiting 8 seconds.
> > [snapscan] test
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:15:43PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> blicero writes:
>
> > [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of snapscan to 2.
> > [snapscan] test_unit_ready: snapscan_cmd command failed: Device
> > busy
> > [snapscan] Scanner warming up - waiting 8 seconds.
> > [snapscan] test
Hi,
> i report from the chat since i dunno if someone is listening :)))
>
> hi everybody
> got a problem with an epson 3490
> it should work
> from web research
> it works for anybody
> but I get an ERROR :((
> nihil:/etc/udev/rules.d# /usr/bin/scanimage
> [sanei_debug] Setting debug l
blicero writes:
> [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of snapscan to 2.
> [snapscan] test_unit_ready: snapscan_cmd command failed: Device
> busy
> [snapscan] Scanner warming up - waiting 8 seconds.
> [snapscan] test_unit_ready: snapscan_cmd command failed: Error
> during
> device I/O
> [snapsc
i report from the chat since i dunno if someone is listening :)))
hi everybody
got a problem with an epson 3490
it should work
from web research
it works for anybody
but I get an ERROR :((
nihil:/etc/udev/rules.d# /usr/bin/scanimage
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of snapscan to 2.
On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 21:09 +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> I will probably end my experiments with a patch.
>
> > Do you know whether this scanner sets a different focal plane when
> > scanning slides/film compared to the flatbed (as it should)?
>
> Haven't checked that yet. But I don't know i
On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 15:48 +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> It looks like the black calibration (lower values, around 70) is the same
> data in both 8-bit and 16-bit mode (i.e., in 8-bit mode the LSB is
> present and 6-bit MSB is assumed to be zero).
>
> I will experiment with this a bit longer
Hi,
Oliver Schwartz writes:
> The Epson 3490 uses 14 bit internally. The gamma table is used to
> spread or shrink the values into 8 / 16 bit.
I see. So they just lie about 48-bit _in_?
http://www.epson.co.uk/products/scanners/product_spec/Perfection3490Photo.htm
Not nice, I wouldn't expect
Hi,
Kai-Uwe Behrmann writes:
>> Is this scanner really 48-bit (3 * 16 bit)? Can I really get full 16-bit
>> data from it?
>
> This certainly not for the above device. I would guess 10-14 bit with
> appropriate noice.
I've measured the usable (negative film) signal range and it gives
more than
Krzysztof,
not an insider of sane programming, but some comments below:
Am 11.02.06, 13:54 +0100 schrieb Krzysztof Halasa:
> Hi,
>
> Please forgive my ignorance, I've just started using EPSON 3490.
>
> I'm especially interested in scanning negative 35 mm films (yes, I know
> it's low-end, it's
Hi,
Please forgive my ignorance, I've just started using EPSON 3490.
I'm especially interested in scanning negative 35 mm films (yes, I know
it's low-end, it's like an experiment).
Reading the sources to snapscan backend I got the impression that:
a) before the actual scanning the scanner perfor
Hi,
> Can i hope, that the auto film feeder of the epson 3590 will work?
At the moment the film feed for the 3590 is not supported. I'll need
to get USB traces from a windows scan with film feeder before there's
any chance of supporting it. Anybody who'd like to provide a trace is
welcome to c
Hello,
in the last days i have read a lot of the epson 3490 implantation in the
snapscan-backend. Thats is very great.
Can i hope, that the auto film feeder of the epson 3590 will work?
Thanks and regards.
Dietmar
Using a SANE version compiled from CVS in parallel with an older
version installed with the operating system can be tricky, because
some programs will load libsane-XXX.so libraries, whereas others
seem to look for libsane-XXX.so.1 first. Both of them are links
to the "real things", libsane-XXX.so.1
Selon Oliver Schwartz :
> Hi,
>
> > I've just been sending the log to your private email. It's a log of a
> > preview and a scan of a little piece of the original film at 50 dpi.
>
> Thanks. Please also send me the version of your firmware file. Run
> strings esfw52.bin | grep -i epson
> to get it
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 18:42 +0100, Oliver Schwartz wrote:
> > I want to scan a negative film, but the resulting file is crossed
> > by a thick green line.
> > I've tried to scan at different scan resolution and bit depth, but
> > the resulting scan is always bad. The higher the resolution is the
>
> Once it works you should start logging and do a preview scan and a
> scan of a very small area in low resolution, both times using the
> transparency adapter. The log files tend to get quite large, but it
> should shrink to a manageable size after zipping. Please send it to
> me directly, not
Hi,
> I've just bought an epson 3490, and download the
> sane-backends-2005-11-10.tar.gz and
> sane-frontends-2005-11-10.tar.gz.
>
> While the flatbed seems to work as expected, the transparency unit
> doesn't.
>
> I want to scan a negative film, but the resulting file is crossed
> by a thick gree
I've just bought an epson 3490, and download the
sane-backends-2005-11-10.tar.gz and sane-frontends-2005-11-10.tar.gz.
While the flatbed seems to work as expected, the transparency unit doesn't.
I want to scan a negative film, but the resulting file is crossed by a
thick green line.
I've tried t
Jens Schneider writes:
> Hi Olaf,
>
> you mentioned in an earlier posting, that 3490 PHOTO will be
> suported by iscan 1.17.0. This is great news. Do you have an idea
> about the release date of this version?
Keep an eye on http://www.avasys.jp/english/linux_e/ towards the end
of September, begi
Hi Olaf,
you mentioned in an earlier posting, that 3490 PHOTO will be suported by iscan
1.17.0. This is great news. Do you have an idea about the release date of
this version?
>>Jim MacLeod writes:
>>
>> Having now read a previous mail about the 4490 I'm guessing that the
>> same applies to th
Oliver Schwartz writes:
> Hi,
>> The CVS snapshot I downloaded for 20050815 didn't contain that
>> patch. And the CVS version doesn't work for me now (whether I make
>> that modification or not), I alternately get messages like
>>
>> scanimage: open of device snapscan:libusb:001:003 failed: Error
Hi,
> The CVS snapshot I downloaded for 20050815 didn't contain that
> patch. And the CVS version doesn't work for me now (whether I make
> that modification or not), I alternately get messages like
>
> scanimage: open of device snapscan:libusb:001:003 failed: Error
> during device I/O
>
> and
>
>
Oliver Schwartz writes:
> Hi,
>> > If it is always the same ratio of real distance to scanned
>> > distance (also for -l and -t) it is most likely that the
>> > calculation of the scan area is not handled correctly. That could
>> > be corrected by changing the value of pos_factor in function
>> >
Hi,
> > If it is always the same ratio of real distance to scanned
> > distance (also for -l and -t) it is most likely that the
> > calculation of the scan area is not handled correctly. That could
> > be corrected by changing the value of pos_factor in function
> > set_window() in snapscan-scsi.c
Levente Nov?k writes:
> On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 00:54 -0700, Bjorn Solberg wrote:
>> > Another thing that I'm interested in is whether only the size of the
>> > scan area is wrong or if the origins of the scan area are also not
>> > set correctly (i.e. options -l and -t in scanimage)
>>
>> -x and
Oliver Schwartz writes:
> Hi,
>> I don't have access to that information right now, so I'll check
>> that tonight also. It is whatever firmware came with the scanner -
>> esfw52.bin.
> yes, but at least for other epson scanners these firmware files are
> available in different versions. The fil
Henning Meier-Geinitz writes:
>> Having now read a previous mail about the 4490 I'm guessing that
>> the same applies to the 3490, ie no go..are my fears justified?
>
> That scanner isn't even in our list. Can anyone provide more details
> (vendor/product ids, chipset)? Support is planned for the
Jim MacLeod writes:
> I'm new to scanning and relatively new to Linux. Searched the web
> for info and got the impression, which others confirmed, that
> generally anything epson works with Linux, but maybe not the 3490!
> sane-find-scanner gets vendor and product code but scanimage -L
> finds no
Hi,
> I don't have access to that information right now, so I'll check
> that tonight also. It is whatever firmware came with the scanner -
> esfw52.bin.
yes, but at least for other epson scanners these firmware files are
available in different versions. The filename is always the same.
Anothe
Oliver Schwartz writes:
[...]
> Can you please check a few things:
> - What frontend are you using?
scanimage, the CVS version from 20050815.
> - Does "scanimage" as frontend scan the correct area? E.g. does
> "scanimage -x 10 -y 10" scan an area of 10x10 cm? Please try with
> different resol
Hi,
> That made scanimage recognize and use the scanner, but it is unable
> to scan the full page. It only scans 75-80% of the width and
> height. Subsequent questions have gone unanswered and I've had
> limited time to look into the backend code myself so I think my
> solution is to return the s
Hi,
> It says that that scanner is supported with support level "basic"
> by the snapscan backend.
>
> > sane-find-scanner gets vendor and product code but scanimage -L
> > finds nothing.
>
> Maybe your sane-backends package is just too old? As far as I know,
> you need version 1.0.16 for that sca
Jim MacLeod writes:
> I'm new to scanning and relatively new to Linux. Searched the web for info
> and got the impression, which others confirmed, that generally anything
> epson works with Linux, but maybe not the 3490! sane-find-scanner gets
> vendor and product code but scanimage -L finds nothi
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:16:46PM +0100, Jim MacLeod wrote:
> I'm new to scanning and relatively new to Linux. Searched the web for info
> and got the impression, which others confirmed, that generally anything
> epson works with Linux, but maybe not the 3490!
Generally, to find out if a sca
I'm new to scanning and relatively new to Linux. Searched the web for info
and got the impression, which others confirmed, that generally anything
epson works with Linux, but maybe not the 3490! sane-find-scanner gets
vendor and product code but scanimage -L finds nothing.
Having now read a previo
47 matches
Mail list logo
