Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 10:10:15AM +0300, Max Ushakov wrote:
>
>
>>So maybe it is still correct to use all kernel includes instead
>>of the corresponding glibc includes.
>>
>
> It is not.
Definitely not all of them. Only one springs to mind :-)
In 99% of cases applications ge
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 11:33:38PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 March 2002 08:32 pm, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> >john meshkoff wrote:
[skip]
> >John,
> >The kernel compiles the sg driver (either built-in or a module)
> >against the //include/scsi/sg.h header.
> >It would be difficult
--Qn4G1eBrv+t66M9q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 10:10:15AM +0300, Max Ushakov wrote:
> So maybe it is still correct to use all kernel includes instead
> of the corresponding glibc includes.
It is not.
Tim.
*/
--Qn4G1eBrv+t66M9q
On Tuesday 12 March 2002 08:32 pm, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>john meshkoff wrote:
>> The error:
>>
>> sanei_scsi.c: In function `sanei_scsi_req_wait':
>> sanei_scsi.c:2079: structure has no member named `host_status'
>> sanei_scsi.c:2080: structure has no member named `host_status'
>> sanei_scsi.c:20
john meshkoff wrote:
> The error:
>
> sanei_scsi.c: In function `sanei_scsi_req_wait':
> sanei_scsi.c:2079: structure has no member named `host_status'
> sanei_scsi.c:2080: structure has no member named `host_status'
> sanei_scsi.c:2081: structure has no member named `host_status'
> sanei_scsi.c:2
The error:
sanei_scsi.c: In function `sanei_scsi_req_wait':
sanei_scsi.c:2079: structure has no member named `host_status'
sanei_scsi.c:2080: structure has no member named `host_status'
sanei_scsi.c:2081: structure has no member named `host_status'
sanei_scsi.c:2082: structure has no member named
