[sane-devel] Genesys backend status update

2005-07-04 Thread Stéphane VOLTZ
Le Dimanche 3 Juillet 2005 15:47, Henning Meier-Geinitz a =E9crit=A0: > > What's your plan about the genesys backend in experimental? Should it > be stilled used for experimental changes? Otherwise I'd add a README > entry that the main CVS should be used from now on. > > Bye, > Henning

[sane-devel] Genesys backend status update

2005-07-03 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 07:16:44AM +0200, Stéphane VOLTZ wrote: > I have commit a fix for the last known bug by adding a 60 s timer after > init > for HP2300. Now I think that this backend is ready for inclusion in regular > CVS, see also > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sa

[sane-devel] Genesys backend status update

2005-06-24 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
Hi, On Thursday 23 June 2005 07:16, St=E9phane VOLTZ wrote: > Hello, > > I have commit a fix for the last known bug by adding a 60 s timer after > init for HP2300. Now I think that this backend is ready for inclusion in > regular CVS, see also > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail

[sane-devel] Genesys backend status update

2005-06-23 Thread Stéphane VOLTZ
Hello, I have commit a fix for the last known bug by adding a 60 s timer after init for HP2300. Now I think that this backend is ready for inclusion in regular CVS, see also http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2005-June/013769.html . Should I go for it

[sane-devel] genesys backend status update

2005-05-28 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 08:12:01AM +0200, stef wrote: > I've started to address the points you raised (and I sohouldn't have > forgotten ...). I'll signal when I'll feel the backend is up to the > requirements. One more thing I just noticed: If you want to use the genesys.desc file cur

[sane-devel] genesys backend status update

2005-05-20 Thread stef
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for the late response. > Hello, seems I'm not also that fast on mail. I was busy getting 2300c to work ... > On Wednesday 11 May 2005 19:00, stef wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I don't think we can have

[sane-devel] genesys backend status update

2005-05-14 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
Hi, sorry for the late response. On Wednesday 11 May 2005 19:00, stef wrote: > Hello, > > I don't think we can have gl641 and gl841 in the same file. First some > registers of same index have different bits. Second the enum we use to > access registers are different. This overlap mak

[sane-devel] genesys backend status update

2005-05-11 Thread Philipp Schmid
Hello, >I've now finished the suggested restructure work for the genesys >backend - it can be found in experimental/genesys-new. > You've to keep in mind that genesys-new/genesys_gl841.c bases on my really bad version of genesys_gl841.c that isn't able to get compiled. I'm sorry about this and t

[sane-devel] genesys backend status update

2005-05-11 Thread stef
Hello, I don't think we can have gl641 and gl841 in the same file. First some registers of same index have different bits. Second the enum we use to access registers are different. This overlap make it much harder to have both in one file than to have 2 cleanly separated objects.

[sane-devel] genesys backend status update

2005-05-11 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
Hi, I've now finished the suggested restructure work for the genesys backend - it can be found in experimental/genesys-new. It's done the same (or nearly the same) way as Henning did it with the gt68xx backend. The code is based on the current CVS stuff... Any comments? Gerhard

[sane-devel] genesys backend status update

2005-05-11 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 08:12, stef wrote: > Hello, > > I've started to address the points you raised (and I sohouldn't have > forgotten ...). I'll signal when I'll feel the backend is up to the > requirements. > > Regards, > Stef > Another thing, I've forgotten: See the file

[sane-devel] genesys backend status update

2005-05-11 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
Hi, On Tuesday 10 May 2005 21:04, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:39:23AM +0200, stef wrote: > > Hello, [SNIPSNAP] > Then I did "configure --enable-static; make; make libcheck" and got > the following: > Libraries exporting 'illegal' symbols: > *** backend/.l

[sane-devel] genesys backend status update

2005-05-11 Thread stef
Hello, I've started to address the points you raised (and I sohouldn't have forgotten ...). I'll signal when I'll feel the backend is up to the requirements. Regards, Stef

[sane-devel] genesys backend status update

2005-05-10 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:39:23AM +0200, stef wrote: > Hello, > > here's the status of the genesy backend after last commit: By the way, thanks for all your work. So finally this backend c

[sane-devel] genesys backend status update

2005-05-06 Thread stef
Hello, here's the status of the genesy backend after last commit: - MD6471 is fully supported in color, gray and linart modes, at 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400, 500, 600, 800 and 1200 dpi - code have been split up so that the genesys_low.c file is now