On Thursday 05 May 2016 14:18:59 m. allan noah wrote:
> Xsane has no networking code in it. Everything you have described so
> far sounds like a problem in the brother4 backend. I suggest you try
> the same test using scanimage at the command line, and if it is still
> slow, compare to the windows
Xsane has no networking code in it. Everything you have described so
far sounds like a problem in the brother4 backend. I suggest you try
the same test using scanimage at the command line, and if it is still
slow, compare to the windows driver. If you see a difference, ask
Brother about brother4.
On Thursday 05 May 2016 10:31:53 Richard Ryniker wrote:
> I doubt a gigabit Ethernet connection will make any significant
> difference.
After investigating the lcd panels network settings for a wired lan, and
finding the best it can do is 100mbit-fd, that switch isn't going to do
a lot of good.
On Thursday 05 May 2016 11:14:29 Richard Ryniker wrote:
> "Timed wait" is the final stage when a TCP connection is closed. TCP
> has the notion of "maximum segment lifetime" - how long a datagram
> might remain somewhere in the network. Before a connection is
> completely closed, it remains in t
I doubt a gigabit Ethernet connection will make any significant
difference. Data rate from your scanner is dependent on the mechanical
speed of the sensor and scan resolution. If you scan a page 8.5 by 11
inches at 600 pixels per inch resolution with 24 bits per pixel, there is
about 100 megabyte
"Timed wait" is the final stage when a TCP connection is closed. TCP has
the notion of "maximum segment lifetime" - how long a datagram might
remain somewhere in the network. Before a connection is completely
closed, it remains in the "timed wait" state for twice this maximum
segment lifetime. T
On Thursday 05 May 2016 09:16:51 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 05 May 2016 05:41:39 Yury Tarasievich wrote:
> > Never used ethernet accessible scanners, but a
> > good practice on using sane from sources is to
> > be sure you don't have the previous versions'
> > 'leftovers' (configs, `rules.d
On Thursday 05 May 2016 05:41:39 Yury Tarasievich wrote:
> Never used ethernet accessible scanners, but a
> good practice on using sane from sources is to
> be sure you don't have the previous versions'
> 'leftovers' (configs, `rules.d` files, ...) in
> your installation.
>
> I'd say your log hint
Never used ethernet accessible scanners, but a
good practice on using sane from sources is to
be sure you don't have the previous versions'
'leftovers' (configs, `rules.d` files, ...) in
your installation.
I'd say your log hints at saned already being
run on your system with some already exi
On Wednesday 04 May 2016 19:44:32 Roger wrote:
> >That long piece of Belden Cat5e managed to survive a 112 mph wind in
> > 2010 that took down 3 40 yo pines, all our privacy fence, 50 square
> > feet of shingles off the roof, a couple shingles off the shop
> > building and flying debris damaged so
>That long piece of Belden Cat5e managed to survive a 112 mph wind in 2010
>that took down 3 40 yo pines, all our privacy fence, 50 square feet of
>shingles off the roof, a couple shingles off the shop building and flying
>debris damaged some siding & guttering. And the cable still functions
>righ
On Wednesday 04 May 2016 07:27:01 m. allan noah wrote:
> Gene- if your scanner has ethernet connectivity, you don't need to use
> the net backend or saned. Those are basically adapters that allow you
> to convert a non-networked scanner into a networked one, by using a
> saned server as an interme
Gene- if your scanner has ethernet connectivity, you don't need to use
the net backend or saned. Those are basically adapters that allow you
to convert a non-networked scanner into a networked one, by using a
saned server as an intermediary.
I think you need to see if the brother docs list any deb
On Wednesday 04 May 2016 01:43:59 Roger wrote:
> > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 11:58:56PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >That wasn't any help, but since the vendor/product was found when I
> >plugged in a USB cable, running xsane then found it at the usb bus
> > and address, and I ran a few scans. See
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 11:58:56PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>That wasn't any help, but since the vendor/product was found when I
>plugged in a USB cable, running xsane then found it at the usb bus and
>address, and I ran a few scans. Seems to work about as expected and I
>believe at a bette
On Tuesday 03 May 2016 20:52:35 m. allan noah wrote:
> Well, that implies that we are handing control to the brother4
> backend, but it is not finding any scanners. Perhaps try the same as
> root?
>
> allan
That wasn't any help, but since the vendor/product was found when I
plugged in a USB cabl
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:18:15PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>This system has only USB2.0, so a 100mbit ethernet is still faster.
If I'm not mistaken; USB 1 has a 1.4 megabit transfer rate, USB 2 has
a 480 megabit transfer rate, and USB 3 has a 5 gigabit transfer
rate. (Try not to confuse meg
Well, that implies that we are handing control to the brother4
backend, but it is not finding any scanners. Perhaps try the same as
root?
allan
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 May 2016 17:54:54 m. allan noah wrote:
>
>> SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255 scanimage -L
>
> And
On Tuesday 03 May 2016 17:54:54 m. allan noah wrote:
> SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255 scanimage -L
And that query returns this enlightening report:
[dll] load: searching backend `brother4' in
`/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sane:/usr/lib/sane'
[dll] load: trying to load
`/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sane/libsane-brot
We cannot really help you on the brother stuff, since it is closed
source, and not produced by us. But, we can suggest that you try the
following:
comment out every line of dll.conf except for the the brother lines
you need, and one other random backend (maybe, fujitsu). Then run:
SANE_DEBUG_DLL=
On Tuesday 03 May 2016 16:45:58 Roger wrote:
> ON-TOPIC REPLY: You may require two separate drivers, one for the USB
> connection and another driver for the network connected device. And
> separate drivers for the printer & scanner functions. Albeit, they
> are sometimes bundled together by manu
ON-TOPIC REPLY: You may require two separate drivers, one for the USB
connection and another driver for the network connected device. And separate
drivers for the printer & scanner functions. Albeit, they are sometimes
bundled together by manufacturer. (ie. HP's HPLIP package)
OFF-TOPIC REP
On Tuesday 03 May 2016 10:07:49 Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> I just bought a Brother MFC-J6920DW, and installed the brother linux
> .deb drivers that are "supposed" to let xsane run the scanner. But
> xsane makes no attempt to access it even if I plug in a USB cable. It
> did install
Greetings all;
I just bought a Brother MFC-J6920DW, and installed the brother linux .deb
drivers that are "supposed" to let xsane run the scanner. But xsane
makes no attempt to access it even if I plug in a USB cable. It did
install the name "brother4" in /etc/sane.d/dll.conf, but I can't fin
24 matches
Mail list logo
