On Sunday 02 February 2003 14:54, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> ...
> What I question is given you have used the high end expensive
> equipment to take the photographs, why you would then used a
> cheap flat bed scanner to scan them in. It just does not make
> any logical sense at all.
>
> If you can't
k...@khk.net said:
> Especially if you have mid and large format slides or negatives,
> using a flatbed is a much more cost effictive solution, for large
> format you may not even be able to find a dedicated film scanner
> (that is as long as we are not talking about drum scanners).
Minolta Scan
--QTprm0S8XgL7H0Dt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The Perfection 2450 and the new 3200 are pretty good for scanning
negatives and slides. I actually prefer the scans from my 2450 to
the ones from my Canon FS4000. E
till.kamppe...@gmx.net said:
> A good choice is probably the Epson Perfection 2450 Photo. It comes
> with frames for 35 mm negatives, 35 mm slides, 6x9 cm negatives/
> slides (here also fit 6x6 negatives/slides), and even for 4x5 inch
> negatives/slides.
> The scanner works with the "epson" driv
A good choice is probably the Epson Perfection 2450 Photo. It comes with
frames for 35 mm negatives, 35 mm slides, 6x9 cm negatives/slides (here
also fit 6x6 negatives/slides), and even for 4x5 inch negatives/slides.
The scanner works with the "epson" driver of SANE and is also supported
direct
Hello.
Question: which (flatbed) scanner to buy?
- scanning of 6x6cm dias=20
- working with linux
Thanks.
Joachim=20
