Hi,
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 03:48:43PM -0700, Philip M Dunton wrote:
> Since Redhat is such a popular distribution I figured someone else already
> had
> seen this anomalous behavior. I had zero problems after installing RH 8.
Which anomalous behaviour? I asked what you really mean but you did
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 08:11:02PM -0700, Philip M Dunton wrote:
> I have an Epson 1650 scanner which worked perfectly with my Redhat 8
> installation. Never a second of grief.
> Now, after switching to RH 9 and the version of Sane which comes with it I
Which version of SANE is that (scani
--fNagykWcDoSVAmSd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:51:20AM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> You mean xsane is started when you log into X? Oh well...
That might be the case if he has put it in his GNOME session; it's not
some
I have an Epson 1650 scanner which worked perfectly with my Redhat 8
installation. Never a second of grief.
Now, after switching to RH 9 and the version of Sane which comes with it I
find a very ill-mannered Sane implementation.
First, XSane goes out and looks for a scanner automatically on log-
