[sane-devel] UMax PowerLook 2100XL under OpenBSD, still

2006-06-08 Thread m. allan noah
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Alan Corey wrote: > I had made an initial post, then posted a debug run which ended up in a > different thread because I subscribed in digest mode initially so I couldn't > reply. Anyway, I saw a tiny bit of activity on my debug file in my Apache > logs, but I don't really kno

[sane-devel] UMax PowerLook 2100XL under OpenBSD, still

2006-06-08 Thread Alan Corey
I had made an initial post, then posted a debug run which ended up in a different thread because I subscribed in digest mode initially so I couldn't reply. Anyway, I saw a tiny bit of activity on my debug file in my Apache logs, but I don't really know who looked and I haven't heard anything. To

[sane-devel] UMax Powerlook 2100XL under OpenBSD

2006-05-31 Thread m. allan noah
can you get a debug log of a small area scanimage run, and put it up on the web somewhere? post a link to it on this list. allan On Wed, 31 May 2006, Alan Corey wrote: > I'm back with another UMax. I seem to be having a problem with the scsi > buffer > size setting. If I increase it from the

[sane-devel] UMax Powerlook 2100XL under OpenBSD

2006-05-31 Thread Alan Corey
I'm back with another UMax. I seem to be having a problem with the scsi buffer size setting. If I increase it from the default 32768 by even a small amount, I get an out of memory error immediately on starting to preview. Using the default of 32768 I can preview and scan in line art and gray sca