Thorsten M?ller writes:
> Am Montag, 24. Juni 2013, 07:09:43 schrieb richard at rushlogistics.com:
>> scanimage -V
>>
>> scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.21; backend version 1.0.21
>
> Well, that is too old. The first version of genesys backend which is
> used for LiDE 110 and LiDE 210 (that's the
Was able to get it to work with sane-backends1.0.22 This page was very helpful.
http://www.melvilletheatre.com/articles/canon-lide-110-scanner/
El Jun 24, 2013, a las 7:40 AM, richard at rushlogistics.com escribi?:
> Okay, thanks. Can I upgrade via yum or must I use rpms or source. Can you
>
Am Montag, 24. Juni 2013, 07:09:43 schrieb richard at rushlogistics.com:
> scanimage -V
>
> scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.21; backend version 1.0.21
Well, that is too old. The first version of genesys backend which is
used for LiDE 110 and LiDE 210 (that's the one I have) to support those
scann
Okay, thanks. Can I upgrade via yum or must I use rpms or source. Can you tell
me where to find?
Thanks so much.
El Jun 24, 2013, a las 7:25 AM, Thorsten M?ller escribi?:
> Am Montag, 24. Juni 2013, 07:09:43 schrieb richard at rushlogistics.com:
>> scanimage -V
>>
>> scanimage (sane-backends
scanimage -V
scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.21; backend version 1.0.21
El Jun 23, 2013, a las 6:22 PM, "m. allan noah"
escribi?:
> Well, you could start by telling us which version of sane-backends you
> are running.
>
> allan
>
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:20 PM, wrote:
>> I know people
Well, you could start by telling us which version of sane-backends you
are running.
allan
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:20 PM, wrote:
> I know people on this list are very busy solving really important problems
> and writing drivers, but if someone can please help as I have been at this
> all day
Allan, Thanks so much for your reply. I finally gave up and came home but I
will be back at the office at 7am and will find out. I installed sane via yum
yesterday but I'm not sure which version it is. Thanks again
El Jun 23, 2013, a las 6:22 PM, "m. allan noah"
escribi?:
> Well, you could
I know people on this list are very busy solving really important problems and
writing drivers, but if someone can please help as I have been at this all day
and want to go home.
I have a CanoScan Lide 110 that I am trying to get to work on a Centos 6.4
fresh install.
Sane-find-scanner detects
On Monday 25 January 2010, Jin Chen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been playing with the settings for quite a while and the scanning
> results are still not good enough.
>
> I was using Xsane 0.996 under Ubuntu 9.10 to scane blank writing pad paper
> with rule-lines. Note the paper is white and has no
In general, it is better to use the brightness/contrast/gamma controls
provided by the backend, instead of those provided by Xsane. Usually
they are hidden in some other window, which must be enabled from the
Xsane menu bar, though some backends dont provide these controls.
Unfortunately, you did n
Hi All,
I've been playing with the settings for quite a while and the scanning
results are still not good enough.
I was using Xsane 0.996 under Ubuntu 9.10 to scane blank writing pad paper
with rule-lines. Note the paper is white and has no
ink at all, except those rule-lines. When I scanned this
On Thursday 19 October 2006 17:03, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Rodolfo Medina writes:
>
> > [...] I bought a brand new
> > CanoScan LIDE 25. It seems to be seen by `sane-find scanner', in fact:
> >
> > # sane-find-scanner
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x22
Rodolfo Medina writes:
> [...] I bought a brand new
> CanoScan LIDE 25. It seems to be seen by `sane-find scanner', in fact:
>
> # sane-find-scanner
>
> [...]
>
> found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x2220 [CanoScan],
> chip=LM9832/3) at libusb:001:003
>
> . At http://www.sane-p
Hi Craig,
Cc:d sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org for the record.
Craig Setera writes:
> Olaf,
>
> Thanks for your response. It appears that iscan does support this
> scanner. Does iscan replace sane or does sane take advantage of
> iscan? I'd like to get remote scanning going using winsane,
Hi Craig,
Cc:d sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org for the record.
Craig Setera writes:
> Olaf,
>
> Thanks for your response. It appears that iscan does support this
> scanner. Does iscan replace sane or does sane take advantage of
> iscan? I'd like to get remote scanning going using winsane,
Hi Craig,
I saw your mail on the list but did not have time to look at this at
work. I've taken a look at the usbsnoop log you made. The CX-5800
obviously doesn't use the ESC/I protocol assumed and supported by the
epson and epkowa backends. As Oliver already confirmed that it also
does not use
Oliver, thanks for taking a look.
For those kinds souls that would be willing to take a look, the USB
snoop log is stashed up on my web site. You can grab it from here
http://www.gizmo-a-gogo.org/sane/usbsnoop.zip
Thanks,
Craig
Oliver Schwartz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've taken a look at the USB tra
Henning,
Thanks for your response. I had it in my head that this scanner was
supported because I saw this entry
http://www.linuxprinting.org/show_printer.cgi?recnum=Epson-Stylus_CX5800
at linuxprinting.org. I understand that that is a different project
altogether from Sane.
What can I do to
Hi,
On 2006-05-06 21:25, Craig Setera wrote:
> I just bought an Epson Stylus CX-5800 All-In-One machine the other day
This scanner is not in our lists at all so it's not known, if it is
supported at all.
Maybe the epkowa backend maintainer knows more about this scanner?
Maybe it works with the
Hello,
I just bought an Epson Stylus CX-5800 All-In-One machine the other day
that I'm hosting on my network. I have printing working fine at this
point, but I can't seem to get the Sane Epson backend to talk to this
new machine. I have the USB device information explicitly called out in
the
Karl Heinz Kremer wrote:
Hi,
> I'm about to receive a Perfection 636S, which uses the same command set as
> the 636U. This means that I can (for the first time) actually debug this
> problem myself. I can assure you that this problem will be fixed in a few
> weeks.
Very good news ! Happy hackin
I'm about to receive a Perfection 636S, which uses the same command set
as
the 636U. This means that I can (for the first time) actually debug this
problem myself. I can assure you that this problem will be fixed in a
few
weeks.
Karl Heinz
On Jul 4, 2004, at 4:03 PM, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> He
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
Hi,
> Anyway, make sure that a line containing only "usb" is in epson.conf.
> If that's the case, show us the complete log. To make the log shorter,
> you can disable everything but "epson" in dll.conf.
Support for the Perfection 636U seems to be kind of broken late
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 11:37:05AM -0400, Fritz Lang wrote:
> I have a G3 450Mhz running Panther.3.2 on OEM video card.
That's the interesting part of the log:
> [epson] sane_init: sane-backends 1.0.14
> [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of sanei_usb to 255.
> usb_set_debug: Setting debuggi
I have a G3 450Mhz running Panther.3.2 on OEM video card.
256M RAM
PCI USB 2 port and PCI FW 2 port cards.
Only the Epson 636U scanner is plugged in.
I powered the scanner on first, then plugged into the port.
There are no other apps running that scan, nor do I have any other
apps that scan. N
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:26:24PM -0500, Ryan wrote:
> I'm running xsane .89. And this is my output from 'rpm -qa |grep sane'
> sane-backends-1.0.8-5
> sane-frontends-1.0.8-4
> sane-backends-devel-1.0.8-5
> xsane-0.89-1
Should be ok.
> > > But this was all working last time I tried it.
> >
On Friday 15 November 2002 05:17 am, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:13:58PM -0500, Ryan wrote:
> > I had xsane/sane working. I think the last time I used it was before=
I
> > updated to RH8 from 7.3.
>
> Which version of SANE are you using now (server + client)?
I'm running xsan
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:13:58PM -0500, Ryan wrote:
> I had xsane/sane working. I think the last time I used it was before I
> updated to RH8 from 7.3.
Which version of SANE are you using now (server + client)?
> I still works on my PC, but I can't get it to work on my second one using
I'm about ready to give up. I don't know what to try next, any help is=20
appriciated.
I had xsane/sane working. I think the last time I used it was before I=20
updated to RH8 from 7.3.
I still works on my PC, but I can't get it to work on my second one using=
=20
sane's network capability. Bu
Hello
I am new to linux and the sane list, however I was
wondering if any of the gurus out there have been
able to get a canon (groan) fb1210 U to work on
either mandrake 9 or redhat 8.
Thank you in advance for your time
Ashley Scherger
In Australia
**
yeagedl wrote:
> I cannot seem to get this configuration to work. The lowest that I can set
> the max transfer rate is 10. Anyhow, sane-find-scanner does find the
> scanner,
> once anyway. If I try to run scanimage -L it just hangs, no output. Try
> sane-find-scanner again and it fails on a
I cannot seem to get this configuration to work. The lowest that I can set
the max transfer rate is 10. Anyhow, sane-find-scanner does find the scanner,
once anyway. If I try to run scanimage -L it just hangs, no output. Try
sane-find-scanner again and it fails on all devices. Xsane stays o
32 matches
Mail list logo
