Hello,
On Apr 7 21:08 postbote2009-debian at yahoo.com wrote (excerpt):
Julien BLACHE wrote (excerpt):
postbote2009-debian at yahoo.com wrote (excerpt):
device `pixma:04A91725' is a CANON Canon PIXMA MP610 multi-function
peripheral
Seeing how your device is an MFP, it's probably root:lp
postbote2009-debian at yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I?m just curious - if you?ve got the time and it isn?t too difficult to
explain
- why has the user to be in the group lp if in 60-libsane.rules scanner
is
mentioned?
It's due to changes in udev and in the default rules shipped with udev.
But
Johannes Meixner jsmeix at suse.de wrote:
Hi,
All GROUP=scanner are replaced by GROUP=lp.
You do *not* want to do that on a multiuser system. If the reason is not
obvious to the reader, I suggest the reader step away from any root
account she may hold.
[6 paragraphs]
A drawback when using
Hi,
device `pixma:04A91725' is a CANON Canon PIXMA MP610 multi-function
peripheral
Seeing how your device is an MFP, it's probably root:lp instead of
root:scanner due to a change in udev itself between Lenny and Squeeze.
In Lenny the scanner group would prevail, in Squeeze it's
postbote2009-debian at yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
device `pixma:04A91725' is a CANON Canon PIXMA MP610 multi-function peripheral
Seeing how your device is an MFP, it's probably root:lp instead of
root:scanner due to a change in udev itself between Lenny and Squeeze.
In Lenny the scanner group would
