[sane-devel] sane 1.0.14 and MD9890: invalid driver name

2004-09-06 Thread Jochen Eisinger
Hi Eddy, what do you think about this patch: http://c0ffee.org/stuff/mustek_pp.diff Eddy De Greef wrote: > PS: I think we should do something about this. Users should get a > warning that the backend isn't functional already during compilation. kind regards -- jochen

[sane-devel] sane 1.0.14 and MD9890: invalid driver name

2004-09-06 Thread Eddy De Greef
On 09/06/2004 11:15:19 AM, Jochen Eisinger wrote: > Hi Eddy, >=20 > what do you think about this patch: http://c0ffee.org/stuff/mustek_pp.dif= f That looks great. Thanks! Best regards, Eddy

[sane-devel] sane 1.0.14 and MD9890: invalid driver name

2004-09-06 Thread Eddy De Greef
> I am a newbie to SANE and have a strange problem: > I installed SANE 1.0.14 from source and it told me after configure that > mustek_pp will be supported. So I edited > /usr/local/etc/sane.d/mustek_pp.conf and added: > scanner "mustek" * cis1200 >=20 > But all I get is: > fafnir:/usr/local/etc/sa

[sane-devel] sane 1.0.14 and MD9890: invalid driver name

2004-09-05 Thread Jochen Eisinger
Hi, Hauke Zuehl wrote: > [mustek_pp] sane_init: invalid driver name ``cis1200'' this error message is a bit mis-leading, this probably means the scanner is not found. Could you try (as root) sane-find-scanner -v -v -v -p kind regards -- jochen

[sane-devel] sane 1.0.14 and MD9890: invalid driver name

2004-09-05 Thread Hauke Zuehl
Hi folks! I am a newbie to SANE and have a strange problem: I installed SANE 1.0.14 from source and it told me after configure that mustek_pp will be supported. So I edited /usr/local/etc/sane.d/mustek_pp.conf and added: scanner "mustek" * cis1200 But all I get is: fafnir:/usr/local/etc/sane.d #