On Monday 06 August 2012 00:52:59 Simon Lindgren wrote:
> Hi list, scanning newbie here :)
>
> I'll start by naming my scanner in case it's important: It's a CanoScan
> 8800F, which has a film guide for up to 12 35mm frames.
>
> I've begun a project of scanning a bunch of negatives (= in the orde
Hi list, scanning newbie here :)
I'll start by naming my scanner in case it's important: It's a CanoScan
8800F, which has a film guide for up to 12 35mm frames.
I've begun a project of scanning a bunch of negatives (= in the order of
thousands of photos ;)) and I'd like a way to easily scan the n
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:09:02 -0700
Jamie Morken wrote:
> I've been trying to figure out the best light source
> to use for scanning negatives, I've tried flourescent, incandescent, a
> flashlight, a white lightbox etc but all of the scans look horrible
> so far, with only green colour once I inv
Hi,
I am going to be scanning several hundred old 70mm
film rolls (about 100 images per roll), and was
wondering about which SANE compatible scanner would
be good to use for this that is not too expensive
and can do the recommended 2700dpi+ negative
scanning? Is the HP Scanjet 3970 a good on
Right now the only viable solution for negatives with yellow
filter layers is to scan a portion of the film strip *between*
two photos, play with the colour filters of xsane or whatever
scanner software you are using until you have obtained pure
white, and use this filter setting for your photos.
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 14:03, Oscar A. Valdez wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
> I remember reading on the mailing list that you (or maybe someone else?)
> were asking for collaboration with this calibration issue, but I can't
> locate the post.
>
> Is there some way I can help?
Thanks for your offer, but curr
Hi,
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 05:18, Oscar A. Valdez wrote:
> The Canon D660U (which just got supported with sane-backends 1.0.14) has a
> built-in 35mm film adapter. Scanning from the flatbed produces beautiful
> images, but scanning negatives from the film adapter produces images with
> blue top-
El mi=E9, 26-05-2004 a las 00:49, Gerhard Jaeger escribi=F3:
> On Wednesday 26 May 2004 05:18, Oscar A. Valdez wrote:
> > The Canon D660U (which just got supported with sane-backends 1.0.=
14) has a
> > built-in 35mm film adapter. Scanning from the flatbed produces be=
autiful
> > images, but scann
The Canon D660U (which just got supported with sane-backends 1.0.14) has a
built-in 35mm film adapter. Scanning from the flatbed produces beautiful
images, but scanning negatives from the film adapter produces images with blue
top-to-bottom streaks.
Any clues why this might be so?
--
Oscar A. Vald
Hi.
I've searched through the archives and discovered good reports regarding
normal scaning with the epson perfection 1670.
My main use of this scanner would be for scanning negatives. Has the
drivers reached the point where it can scan negatives at the highest
resolution?
Thanks for the inform
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:28:06PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 04 August 2003 21:32, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 09:49:55AM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> >>
> >> Hmm, .so and .la files need execute permissions. Should fix that.
> >
> >Damn! Why don't I read what
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 09:49:55AM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:54:27AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> > All backends appear to be installed in /usr/local/lib/sane, and the
> > epkowa stuff looks like this in there:
> > [root@coyote root]# ls -l /usr/local/lib/sane/
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:54:27AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Olaf, this message is bouncing from zen.epkowa.co.jp, no such site it
> says. But I'll assume the ml now has 2 copies :(
Sorry about that, I forgot to tell mutt to stick in my real address
instead of the default. Should be okay no
On Monday 04 August 2003 20:49, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:54:27AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Olaf, this message is bouncing from zen.epkowa.co.jp, no such site
>> it says. But I'll assume the ml now has 2 copies :(
>
>Sorry about that, I forgot to tell mutt to stick in
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 09:55:13AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> I just tried yesterday to make and install iscan-1.5.2, and I think
> I've fixed the .dll and the epkowa files in sane.d, but neither
> xsane, sane-find-scanner nor scan-image -L shows it.
>
> Suggestions appreciated, other than
Olaf, this message is bouncing from zen.epkowa.co.jp, no such site it
says. But I'll assume the ml now has 2 copies :(
On Sunday 03 August 2003 21:55, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 09:55:13AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I just tried yesterday to make and install iscan-1.5.2,
On Sunday 03 August 2003 21:55, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 09:55:13AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I just tried yesterday to make and install iscan-1.5.2, and I
>> think I've fixed the .dll and the epkowa files in sane.d, but
>> neither xsane, sane-find-scanner nor scan-image
On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Karl Heinz Kremer wrote:
> Have you tried EPSON Kowa's IScan?
>
> You can download it from this link:
> http://www.epkowa.co.jp/english/linux_e/lsd_e.html
>
> I don't know if this will produce better scans. I don't have this
> scanner,
> so I don't have any first hand experienc
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 02:54:12PM +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> > I've asked multiple times for concrete proposals how the standard can
> > be changed or appended. Each time there hasn't been any response. With
> > "concrete proposals" I mean patches to SANE2 or at least the text of
> > th
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 09:41:27PM +0100, Major A wrote:
> > I did sit down and make a long list of things that I thought where missing
> > from the SANE API for negative scanning and posted it to this list. I am
>
> If you have your original email handy, would you mind posting it to
> the li
Jonathan,
> I did sit down and make a long list of things that I thought where missing
> from the SANE API for negative scanning and posted it to this list. I am
If you have your original email handy, would you mind posting it to
the list? Then we would have a good starting point.
Andras
henn...@meier-geinitz.de said:
[SNIP]
> I've asked multiple times for concrete proposals how the standard can
> be changed or appended. Each time there hasn't been any response. With
> "concrete proposals" I mean patches to SANE2 or at least the text of
> the to-be-added well-known options.
>
> I
k...@khk.net said:
> Have you tried EPSON Kowa's IScan?
>
> You can download it from this link:
> http://www.epkowa.co.jp/english/linux_e/lsd_e.html
Haven't you heard, you are not allowed to mention any scanning software
that is not SANE on the mailing list anymore.
JAB.
--
Jonathan A. Buzzar
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 10:49:49AM +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> I simply will not stop, there is no SANE based solution that comes
> close to offering the facilities that VueScan does. For starters the
> SANE standard simply does not support some of the required features
> that negative/fi
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 02:25:54PM +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
>=20
> k...@khk.net said:
> > Have you tried EPSON Kowa's IScan?
> >
> > You can download it from
and...@users.sourceforge.net said:
> This is a SANE email list. People do not usually come here to ask
> questions about other pieces of software, and certainly not to be
> recommended a piece of _commercial_ software. Your statement that good
> negative scans can only be produced with VueScan unde
On Saturday 02 August 2003 07:23, Karl Heinz Kremer wrote:
>Have you tried EPSON Kowa's IScan?
>
>You can download it from this link:
>http://www.epkowa.co.jp/english/linux_e/lsd_e.html
>
>I don't know if this will produce better scans. I don't have this
>scanner,
>so I don't have any first hand ex
Have you tried EPSON Kowa's IScan?
You can download it from this link:
http://www.epkowa.co.jp/english/linux_e/lsd_e.html
I don't know if this will produce better scans. I don't have this=20
scanner,
so I don't have any first hand experience. What I know is that the IScan
software produces pretty
>> This is a SANE email list. [...]
> Go boil your head.
_That_ is _well_ over the top. I think you owe andras an apology.
> People come here looking for solutions.
What reason do you have to believe you are qualified to say what anyone
else comes here looking for?
In any case, this _is_ a SA
Jonathan,
> The only way to get good negatives scans under Linux that I know is
> to use VueScan. This is however shareware. You also need a proper
> negative scanner but that is a separate matter.
This is a SANE email list. People do not usually come here to ask
questions about other pieces of s
pylva...@cs.tut.fi said:
> Has anyone produced reasonable scans of negatives with Epson
> Perfection 1260? I don't have windows, so I don't really know what the
> best this scanner can do is, but xsane produces unacceptable results.
That entirely depends on your idea of reasonable. Firstly there
Has anyone produced reasonable scans of negatives with
Epson Perfection 1260? I don't have windows, so I don't really
know what the best this scanner can do is, but xsane produces
unacceptable results.
Some have mentioned the "stripes" that appear in the scans.
I too, get something like stripes on
32 matches
Mail list logo
