On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:26:50AM -0400, Ward Vandewege via RT wrote:
> > [yavor - Tue Mar 30 10:39:02 2010]:
> >
> > Hossam Hossny wrote:
> > > This looks like something to drive savannah-hackers attention to
> >
> > Actually no, the sysadmins are the ones who can fix this.
> >
> > Some time a
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 03:24:44PM -0500, Ward Vandewege via RT wrote:
> > [beuc - Tue Feb 03 15:14:47 2009]:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 02:40:47PM -0500, Ward Vandewege via RT wrote:
> > > > [beuc - Tue Feb 03 14:01:15 2009]:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 01:58:32PM -0500, Ward Va
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 02:40:47PM -0500, Ward Vandewege via RT wrote:
> > [beuc - Tue Feb 03 14:01:15 2009]:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 01:58:32PM -0500, Ward Vandewege via RT wrote:
> > > > [beuc - Sat Jan 17 05:38:06 2009]:
> > > >
> > > > > > and added them to the aliases on monty python.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 01:58:32PM -0500, Ward Vandewege via RT wrote:
> > [beuc - Sat Jan 17 05:38:06 2009]:
> >
> > > > and added them to the aliases on monty python. Now, the downside
> of this
> > > > is that you can no longer add entries to this file. If you want to be
> > > > able to edit it
> > and added them to the aliases on monty python. Now, the downside of this
> > is that you can no longer add entries to this file. If you want to be
> > able to edit it, we could set up a cron job that rsyncs it off a place
> > on savannah somewhere, if you like.
>
> That would be nice, yes.
> H
Hi,
> > I'm afraid this broke a number of aliases, in particular
> > www-d...@savannah.gnu.org and invalid.nore...@savannah.gnu.org which,
> > if they don't receive mail, need to be valid senders.
> >
> > Check /com/mailer/aliases.
> >
> > Mails were bounced because of this.
> > Please revert th
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:46:25PM -0500, Ward Vandewege via RT wrote:
> > [peabo - Tue Dec 30 17:02:17 2008]:
> >
> > This appears to be fixed (perhaps not in the most elegant way, since it
> > might be nicer to route the message to the bit bucket; right now it
> > generates a bounce to the
Hi Danny, and welcome :)
The following is what RT sent. There is no information about what the
issue was about, so I can't give any status.
Perhaps you can make RT resend them?
--
Sylvain
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 03:37:52PM -0400, Daniel Clark via RT wrote:
> Hi, my name is Danny Clark. I'm a n
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 06:41:29PM -0400, Aubrey Jaffer via RT wrote:
> | Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 23:19:19 +0200
> | From: Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |
> | Hi,
> |
> | It's fixed. A package was missing, probably removed during the last
> | upgrade. However, we should have receive
Hi,
It's fixed. A package was missing, probably removed during the last
upgrade. However, we should have received a mail notification for that
error. I'm investigating it.
--
Sylvain
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 10:39:19AM -0400, Ward Vandewege via RT wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I've put the savannah
I wondered for several minutes whether that was a general consideration or on
the contrary a report of a sudden/abnormal spam activity.
I'll err on the side of "don't tell sysadmin" in the future.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 03:34:15PM -0500, Joshua Ginsberg via RT wrote:
> Sylvain --
>
> While I a
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 05:36:31PM -0400, James Blair via RT wrote:
> > [beuc - Wed Jun 15 14:32:59 2005]:
> >
> > So the only way to send mail from a @hotmail address is to use their
> > webmail?
>
> If the envelope sender is @hotmail.com, yes, we require it to come from
> hotmail.com. This doe
So the only way to send mail from a @hotmail address is to use their
webmail?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:42:54PM -0400, James Blair via RT wrote:
> > [beuc - Tue May 31 15:56:08 2005]:
> >
> > Here's [attached] what I got with a zgrep /var/log/exim/*.
>
> Oh. You said:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's [attached] what I got with a zgrep /var/log/exim/*.
--
Sylvain
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:40:49PM -0400, James Blair via RT wrote:
> > [beuc - Sat May 28 09:12:56 2005]:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] can't send mail to mldonkey-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], while [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 02:42:16PM -0400, James Blair via RT wrote:
> > [corvus - Mon Apr 11 14:40:21 2005]:
> >
> > Maybe the web site checkout now occurs after the creation of the passwd
> > file in the project's chroot.
>
> Of course by after I meant before. :)
>
> That is to say that chec
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:32:16PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > SPF addresses the problem of joe-jobs.
>
> Sorry, what is `SPF', what is `joe-jobs'?
Well, SPF stands for Sender Policy Framework. I suppose joe-jobs is
when a spammer is pretending to be someone else.
> > Until then the best
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 06:31:41PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 08:17:29PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 02:22:01PM -0500, James Blair via RT wrote:
> > > > [beuc - Sat Mar 19 18:33:33 2005]:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > It would be go
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 08:17:29PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 02:22:01PM -0500, James Blair via RT wrote:
> > > [beuc - Sat Mar 19 18:33:33 2005]:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > It would be good to work on this issue:
> >
> > I agree. Would you please modify the creati
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 02:22:01PM -0500, James Blair via RT wrote:
> > [beuc - Sat Mar 19 18:33:33 2005]:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It would be good to work on this issue:
>
> I agree. Would you please modify the creation script to log the time
> and curl command line it uses to create projects? Th
Hi,
It would be good to work on this issue:
* webcvs synchro at project creation: sometimes it doesn't work, it
would be good to check why. Apparently this is not a problem in
Savannah, the problem has been around with 2 different version of the
backend, and the webcvs repository is AFAICS create
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:54:55PM -0500, James Blair via RT wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Mar 16 15:08:08 2005]:
> >
> > When we support additional version control systems, we are likely not
> > to use the same SSH daemon, so it would make more sense to name the IP
> > "cvs.savannah.gnu.org"
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:39:20PM -0500, James Blair via RT wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Mar 15 19:32:46 2005]:
> >
> > Hello sysadmins,
> >
> > Do we have free public IP addresses on the GNU network? We will
> > certainly need other free IPs when installing new version control
> > system
22 matches
Mail list logo
