Re: [gnu.org #248647] Re: [Savannah-help-public] [sr #104528] SMTP sender verification appears to have a too short timeout

2005-08-08 Thread Joerg Wunsch via RT
As Royce Pereira wrote: > So, in simple words- is the problem at my > mail-server(smtp.mtnl.net.in) end, or at the nongnu.org end? Can > anyone please explain to me in dumb language what caused this :) ? Your (provider's?) mail server violates common Internet standards in that it does not accept

Re: [gnu.org #248647] Re: [Savannah-help-public] [sr #104528] SMTP sender verification appears to have a too short timeout

2005-08-08 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Royce Pereira wrote: > So, in simple words- is the problem at my > mail-server(smtp.mtnl.net.in) end, or at the nongnu.org end? Can > anyone please explain to me in dumb language what caused this :) ? Your (provider's?) mail server violates common Internet standards in that it does not accept

Re: [gnu.org #248647] Re: [Savannah-help-public] [sr #104528] SMTP sender verification appears to have a too short timeout

2005-08-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
Hi all, I'm the list subscriber who started this thread coz my mails to any nongnu.org bounced back though I'm subscribed. So, in simple words- is the problem at my mail-server(smtp.mtnl.net.in) end, or at the nongnu.org end? Can anyone please explain to me in dumb language what caused this

Re: [gnu.org #248647] Re: [Savannah-help-public] [sr #104528] SMTP sender verification appears to have a too short timeout

2005-08-08 Thread Royce Pereira
Hi all, I'm the list subscriber who started this thread coz my mails to any nongnu.org bounced back though I'm subscribed. So, in simple words- is the problem at my mail-server(smtp.mtnl.net.in) end, or at the nongnu.org end? Can anyone please explain to me in dumb language what caused thi

[gnu.org #248647] Re: [Savannah-help-public] [sr #104528] SMTP sender verification appears to have a too short timeout

2005-08-08 Thread Justin Baugh via RT
> > The remote site needs to fix this. > > I fully agree. Sorry for wasting your time. :-( No worries. Exim has handy debug features that made it easy to quickly determine what, precisely, was going on. :) > Too bad there are so many poorly maintained Internet sites. The need to stop the flow

Re: [gnu.org #248647] Re: [Savannah-help-public] [sr #104528] SMTP sender verification appears to have a too short timeout

2005-08-08 Thread Joerg Wunsch via RT
As Justin Baugh via RT wrote: > The timeout is not the problem: the remote mail server is actually > complaining about a null reverse path used in the verify callout: > >>> SMTP>> MAIL FROM:<> > >>> SMTP<< 250 Requested mail action okay, completed. > >>> SMTP>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [gnu.org #248647] Re: [Savannah-help-public] [sr #104528] SMTP sender verification appears to have a too short timeout

2005-08-08 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Justin Baugh via RT wrote: > The timeout is not the problem: the remote mail server is actually > complaining about a null reverse path used in the verify callout: > >>> SMTP>> MAIL FROM:<> > >>> SMTP<< 250 Requested mail action okay, completed. > >>> SMTP>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

[gnu.org #248647] Re: [Savannah-help-public] [sr #104528] SMTP sender verification appears to have a too short timeout

2005-08-08 Thread Justin Baugh via RT
> [beuc - Wed Aug 03 16:22:29 2005]: > > Hello Justin, > > We received the following request at Savannah regarding the mail > system. > > Can you have a look at it? Hello Sylvain, et al, The timeout is not the problem: the remote mail server is actually complaining about a null reverse path us

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #104528] SMTP sender verification appears to have a too short timeout

2005-08-03 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Update of sr #104528 (project administration): Assigned to:None => Beuc Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #2: This will h

Re: [Savannah-help-public] [sr #104528] SMTP sender verification appears to have a too short timeout

2005-08-03 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hello Justin, We received the following request at Savannah regarding the mail system. Can you have a look at it? -- Sylvain > URL: > > > Summary: SMTP sender verification appears to have a too short > timeou

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #104528] SMTP sender verification appears to have a too short timeout

2005-08-03 Thread Joerg Wunsch
Follow-up Comment #1, sr #104528 (project administration): Sorry, I haven't been logged in... I'm adding myself and the person in question to the Cc list. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #104528] SMTP sender verification appears to have a too short timeout

2005-08-03 Thread anonymous
URL: Summary: SMTP sender verification appears to have a too short timeout Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: None Submitted on: Wed 08/03/05 at 19:37